hasssanali8998
Elite Member
fpvs will still be better in those situations and distances
PA Options against Indian Armour - ATGMs on MANPADS & Attack Gunship Helicopter - News & Discussions
- Thread starter CSAW
- Start date
RescueRanger
Meme Lord
Multi-Domain Operations and the Evolution of Pakistan’s Conventional Deterrence
The South Asian security environment is undergoing a fundamental shift in how conventional military effectiveness is defined. Decision speed, cross-domain coordination, and technology-enabled command and control have emerged as primary determinants of operational success, a reality that the May...
ciss.org.pk
BlueMarlin
Registered Member
PA Options against Indian Armour
Answer: saturated attacks cheap kamikaze drones/loitering munitions.
you dont need to blow them up jeremy clarkson style, just disable them.
Answer: saturated attacks cheap kamikaze drones/loitering munitions.
you dont need to blow them up jeremy clarkson style, just disable them.
Intervention-06
Registered Member
People make the mistake of studying far away wars (Ukraine) and the Cold war tank warfare doctrine of the Dumbo's in Russia where they send column after column into hostile terrain without forward observers or any mine clearance or C-UAS only for them to get turned into scrap metal.
The Russian war fighting doctrine is send in 10 soldiers and a tank, they get take out send into 10 more, then send in 3 more, they can afford to play this stupid game because they have a conscript army and a butt load of resources, serious militaries don't fight like this, it's not WWII.
This is also the same problem in thought who study the most recent conflict in our region and think that drones and ballistic missiles are the be all and end all, no need for ADS no need for EW, just cigars and flying lawnmowers.
Let's get real please.
Then let’s get real:
If both wars can’t be projected and teached to The south asian Generals- what scenario you have in mind related to drone warfare and armoured warfare in future Pakistan India war !
A drone directing artillery fire is the answer, where the drone directs a 155mm artillery round on top of a T-90.
PakFactor
Elite Member
That's if it's stationary; I'm sure they will probably be deploying counter-battery radars and other tech.
Russians don't seem to be bothered about the bad combat record and negative image of their T-90s and BMPs as destroyed and burnt being shown to the world.People make the mistake of studying far away wars (Ukraine) and the Cold war tank warfare doctrine of the Dumbo's in Russia where they send column after column into hostile terrain without forward observers or any mine clearance or C-UAS only for them to get turned into scrap metal.
The Russian war fighting doctrine is send in 10 soldiers and a tank, they get take out send into 10 more, then send in 3 more, they can afford to play this stupid game because they have a conscript army and a butt load of resources, serious militaries don't fight like this, it's not WWII.
This is also the same problem in thought who study the most recent conflict in our region and think that drones and ballistic missiles are the be all and end all, no need for ADS no need for EW, just cigars and flying lawnmowers.
Let's get real please.
Offensives by Russian piecemeal formations hardly make a dent in enemy's defensive lines. Russian is creating a war of attrition for Ukraine. In fact, drones negate the concept of war of attrition. It comes down to economy, who can produce/acquire and throw in more drones repeatedly.
Not really. GIDS produces Artillery guided rounds, various types.
Users who are viewing this thread
Pakistan Defence Latest
-
-
PTI Murad Saeed in Afghanistan, was 'controlling KP govt' from there: Rana Sanaullah (7 Viewers)
- Latest: HAIDER
-
-
“Beyond Defensive Postures: The Case for an Integrated Offensive Doctrine in Pakistan’s Military Strategy” (2 Viewers)- Latest: Signalian
-
