Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

Its all about the fun part of the British minister's remarks regarding the 1,000 days time period remaining until the military confrontation with Russia, which requires Brits to prepare themselves.
who knows

remember the incident in uk military base, blaming iran without evidence
 
It does look like Netanyahu is the next leader of Israel.
Not so sure yet, his party got the most votes but even with his far right nazi supporters he cant form a government. The opposition said they wont form with him, initially there were reports no main israeli party will not form with arab block too but that stance seems to softening.

Lets see how this plays out, if its a new block and not yahu, then any plans to attack Iran could be substantially delayed.
 
Right now, Iran's approach to Israel has made it nothing more than an electioneering "prop" for Israel and personal kick around for Netanyahu every time Netanyahu wants a distraction.



This is humiliating and not much better than Syria.

At least Syria was able to in effect kill more Zionist terrorists in return by allowing flow of weapons to Hezbollah who pick off armed Zionist terrorists from time to time.

Also Zionist entity never managed to drop bombs on the head of Assad and kill him like they did with Iranian leadership from Supreme Leader downwards.

I am at a loss at Iranian response as they actually managed to impose a cost on the Zionist entity in June 2025 that it only reattacked when US joined them in February 2026. Now the Zionist entity simply takes pot shots at Iran as and when it pleases.
 

Al Arabiya English​

BREAKING: Qatar has not presented ⁠a proposal to Iran but has instead ⁠put forward ⁠ideas that are unacceptable, a senior Iranian official says, adding that Tehran will show ⁠no flexibility regarding the nuclear issue.
 
So Tehran has no leverage over one of their pet projects? Is that what you are trying to convince yourself to believe?
We do, but why would we use our leverage to do a positive thing for the country that has actively been helping our enemies to attack our country? lol The same country that is even now helping the Americans to launch the next round of war against Iran.

This mess could have been avoided.
Yes, it could've been avoided by the Saudis. All Saudi Arabia had to do was not to attack the Houthis of Yemen.
 
We do, but why would we use our leverage to do a positive thing for the country that has actively been helping our enemies to attack our country? lol The same country that is even now helping the Americans to launch the next round of war against Iran.


Yes, it could've been avoided by the Saudis. All Saudi Arabia had to do was not to attack the Houthis of Yemen.
I merely addressed your initial point that Pakistan and/or Mecca Pact is here to influence USA. I do not see that as being the case. I think the meeting was meant to influence Iran over the Houthis. Perhaps we actually agree on that.

As for how this tangential conflict might have been avoided, that is a complicated discussion, since the Houthis are not as victim-like as some might have us believe. They are certainly "useful" to a degree, but so have been many proxies throughout history, idiotic or otherwise.
 
So Tehran has no leverage over one of their pet projects? Is that what you are trying to convince yourself to believe?

This mess could have been avoided.

That's some interesting cope. "Shared civilisation roots" can also be trumped by absolute bog standard human desperation for money or resources.

You think Talibs are sitting in Kabul philosophising over "shared civilisational roots"?

For the same reasoning, sectarian and even "pan-Islamic" dramas are also a facade but I suspect your leadership is well aware of all this.

To borrow a phrase from Eddie Murphy, the only question that matters in regional diplomacy is: what have you done for me lately?
I love how the Taliban who Pakistanis once claimed as a sign of Pakistan's strenght is now biting Pakistan in the ass! God bless the Taliban!!!
 
I am convinced

When he says 'after Midterms' I am leaning towards 'before Midterms' After could just be a ruse. After doesnt do him any good...before gives him options. IMHO
Idk if after or before, but I remember Feb 28th was by surprise after of weeks of "Imminent attack" warnings. So maybe it will be weeks after midterms.
 
I merely addressed your initial point that Pakistan and/or Mecca Pact is here to influence USA. I do not see that as being the case. I think the meeting was meant to influence Iran over the Houthis. Perhaps we actually agree on that.
Then we have no disagreement. I was simply addressing another user's post where he said that we should be thankful to Asim Munir for "his efforts". I mean, that meeting was for asking Iran to convince the Houthis to stop attacking Saudi Arabia. What's there to be thankful for? You're asking us for a favor.

As for how this tangential conflict might have been avoided, that is a complicated discussion, since the Houthis are not as victim-like as some might have us believe. They are certainly "useful" to a degree, but so have been many proxies throughout history, idiotic or otherwise.
Nevertheless, regardless of what you or I think about the Houthis, it is beyond dispute that there was a lasting peace between Saudi Arabia and Houthis until the Saudis thought that now that Iran had been weakened by the US war, they could've defeated the Houthis. They broke the ceasefire and now they have to give concessions to the Houthis and Iran if they want the war to stop. And there's nothing to be thankful for here. Otherwise, they're free to attack the Houthis if they think they can win that war.
 
I love how the Taliban who Pakistanis once claimed as a sign of Pakistan's strenght is now biting Pakistan in the ass! God bless the Taliban!!!
Your blessings for Talibs speak more of your own "strength" than anyone else's.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Latest Posts

Back
Top