ety
Trusted Member
Lol, your Vietnamese kings ascension to throne had to be approved by Chinese Ming emperors, that speaks a lot. When you ask a typical Chinese, no one cares about little Vietnam history that is nothing but irritant, don't flatter yourself, don't BS your Vietnam was equal to China in history. The Ming dynasty beat the shit of your Vietnam.First
In the Song Dynasty, Vietnam did not have a unified local government at all. The Song Dynasty did not consider Vietnam to be the same as Korea, Dali and other foreign countries. In the Song Dynasty, Vietnam was the "fan town" of the Tang Dynasty. Continuation is a country that must be unified; what about Vietnam?
That is to say, the Northern Song Dynasty recognized the fact that the Ding family ruled Vietnam, but did not consider Vietnam to be a country, but an "autonomous land" within the Song Dynasty.
Second, wrong, Vietnamese are ignored because your loser Chinese were too humilated by the existence of Vietnam while Koreans faithfully serve you like loyal little pet
For the Ming, like their imperial predecessors, the pattern of the world
called for a singular emperor who possessed the mandate of Heaven and
ruled tianxia, All-under-Heaven. This was his exclusive right. There
could not be two suns in the sky. Ming China’s other close vassal state,
Choson Korea, conceded to this view. When a Chinese official asked
Ch’oe Pu, a Korean official who visited China in the 1480s, “Is the King
of your country called Emperor?, Ch’oe Pu replied, “In Heaven there
are not two suns; how under the same Heaven can there be two
Emperors? My King’s one purpose is to serve your country devotedly.
Unlike their Korean counterparts, Vietnamese did use the term emperor
in their writings.
Dai Viet was a country with a similar cultural background and political
infrastructure, yet Ming officials preferred to see it as a distant, barbarian
land. Otherwise, it became a discomforting mirror image of China a
country with a parallel emperor, issuing Great Pronouncements and pre
siding over civil service examinations based on the classics. If Dai Viet was
not an integral part of the Chinese empire, it was better for it to be a
categorically different state. It could not be accepted as a mirror state.
What's grandiose about Chinese Forbidden City? It's just a larger complex because China had more wealth and larger beauracracy to accomodate, 'grandiose' ROFL, please get over yourself
EVERY single ruler of Vietnam lived in the Forbidden City starting from Ly all the way to Nguyen even after they moved the capital to Hue the imperial palace is still named Forbidden City, why none of Chinese dynasties ever have Forbidden City until Ming? LOL, so delusional quoting nonsensical BS, it's called Purple Forbidden City because purple is the colour of Jade Emperor's palace ruler of heaven and the Forbidden City is where the Son of Heaven lives on Earth so it's called purple. Vietnamese rulers believed they were Tianzi so that's why it's called Tu Cam Thanh/Zijincheng
These terms were commonly used in Vietnamese Han texts. In the TT, the Viet emperor is called di (帝) and the Ming emperor Ming di (明帝). For an example of Le Loi using the imperial I (tram朕) and claiming the Mandate of Heaven (thien-menh天命),
Lol, Jade emperor is the highest Chinese god in Taoism, you people steal that from China too. You people don't have ancient astronomy, period. Chinese palace grandiose or not is not for you to judge, but for all the visitors who saw it, and many of them have such impression, numb, so you think Vietnamese palace is grandiose and beautiful eh, LMAO.
Last edited:


