Sparten
Registered Member
Not since the late 2010's.
Pakistan Missiles - Updates, News & Discussion
- Thread starter ghazi52
- Start date
falcon34
Registered Member
Fattah 1 is powered RV.Both Fattah 1 and kheybar have Post-Separation Attitude Correction.(Inside and outside the atmosphere).We also have many missiles that only perform target correction only inside the atmosphere.
The guidance method of these two missiles is shown in the following videos:
آپارات - سرویس اشتراک ویدیو
www.aparat.com
آپارات - سرویس اشتراک ویدیو
While Khybar shekan has an orientation correction system thats what i get from the video, ours have sideways thrusters to perform evasive maneuvers.
I went through Shaheen 3 thread on the old pdf and Dr.Samar's interview, what i got from it ours can Perform evasive maneuvers while what u shown in the video is an orientation correction system!.
Sparten
Registered Member
No. If they were they stank. The hits that were seen were clearly sub-sonic at terminal velocity.
PSAC will ensure very high terminal velocity by adjusting the attitude to a very steep angle.
Mehdipersian
Trusted Member
No, only older missiles participated in the attack on Israel. These missiles can change course only inside the atmosphere:
Khyber Shekan
Emad
Rezvan
Sparten
Registered Member
I have believed since the last year of so that there were two separate issues, the data leak and the RV not performing to specs which got mixed up.
I think the Ababeel warhead is probably our first designed without reference to 1998 testing data.
Mehdipersian
Trusted Member
Fattah 1 and 2, in addition to the ability to correct the course, have the ability to maneuver in and out of the atmosphere.
Sparten
Registered Member
Battlefield, basically long-range fires for Corps. Or even Field Army level HQ
Denuclearised Babr and Ra'ad.
everything else is committed to the nuclear deterrant.
Abid123
Trusted Member
Yes we need them..
313Ghazi
Elite Member
I think we need to switch up. Having a good airforce is brilliant, but having a large volume of cheap missiles/drone to flood enemy air defences and poke holes is really important. We won't have air dominance in any conflict, so need to do everything we can to establish it, even if it's temporarily.
RescueRanger
Meme Lord
$$?
arjunk
Trusted Member
For what
arjunk
Trusted Member
Babur is not some cheap suicide drone, it is a reverse engineered Tomahawk. A missile the Americans refused to export to even Israel.
RescueRanger
Meme Lord
Ignore his post. I deleted it for a reason.
Taimoor
Elite Member
These Hindutva rats are beyond delusional.
Iran bombing of Israeli air bases and intelligence outpost is damning proof that despite having the so called best air defences, and with the help of other powerful nations like US/UK/France, they couldn't do jack to stop Iran pinging their most strategic assets. Imagine if those missiles were mated with nuclear warheads? Game over! That's the reason why the hawks in American establishment like John Bolton are huffing and puffing, because Israeli deterrence is shattered.
What chances these rats in India got? Next to Zero...
muhammed45
Elite Member
India cannot have air defense systems of Israel that is a product of latest western technologies. Israel is smaller than smallest province of Iran but it is protected by THAAD and multiple layers of American provided missile systems. Don't forget that source of Iron Dome missile is USA. Not only that the whole NATO defends Israel by all it has.
India can never have this level of protection, moreover it is so expensive that it takes Israel months to replace them.
On the other hand, Pakistan has put its money where its military leadership sees necessary. Therefore, Pakistan has spent billions on airforce and its required infra to have domestic production line for Chinese fighter jets.
Pakistan mostly considers ballistic missiles as a carrier of nuclear punches. Therefore number was never a concern.
IRGC's missile forces is basically designed to be flexible. They can fire hundreds if not thousands of ballistic missiles per day. I don't think that Pakistan has invested in a force like this
Instead, Pakistan has invested in its airforce and nuclear bombs. Not a flexible conventional BM program.
India can never have this level of protection, moreover it is so expensive that it takes Israel months to replace them.
On the other hand, Pakistan has put its money where its military leadership sees necessary. Therefore, Pakistan has spent billions on airforce and its required infra to have domestic production line for Chinese fighter jets.
Pakistan mostly considers ballistic missiles as a carrier of nuclear punches. Therefore number was never a concern.
IRGC's missile forces is basically designed to be flexible. They can fire hundreds if not thousands of ballistic missiles per day. I don't think that Pakistan has invested in a force like this
Instead, Pakistan has invested in its airforce and nuclear bombs. Not a flexible conventional BM program.
