Iranian Missiles | News and Discussions

I’ve read all of them previously, and HIMARs has still destroyed thousands of targets at near 70% effect. At 10,000 rockets delivered that’s 7,000 targets hit.
Are you joking or lying again? HIMARs's current success rate in strikes is no more than 20%! Russian EW has really degraded their accuracy and success rate. 70% success rate for HIMARs was in 2023, when it was still new to the war and there were no effective countermeasures for it in place.
And the US is currently producing 1,167 GMLRs rockets per MONTH. That will increase to 1,500 per month over the next year or two. The US will have no issue delivering a steady supply of GMLRS to Ukraine.
And Ukraine keeps losing town......after town....Ukraine gave up Ugledar so easy in 2024, hasn't it been fought over and desired by both sides since 2022 or early 2023?
The only weapon Russian EW has had significant effects on are Excalibur shells, but the US stopped delivering those 2 years ago.
Lies again - Russian EW has been effective on most NATO shells and projectiles. Lets just be honest- in Electronic Warfare in the military space, Russia is #1, isn't it? I've never known US to have more advanced EW capabilities and equipment than Russia- if that is the case, pls prove it.
 
HIMARS have successfully destroyed thousands of Russian targets. I could link many more videos of successful HIMARs strikes on Russian targets. HIMARs ammo is provided in almost every new weapons package in the last 2 years. It’s been an extremely successful weapon system.

Russians advances are minimal over the last year.

View attachment 69628
So why don't deliver 2000 to ukraine of them and win the war?. I want to breakfast same as you.
I think you play to much to Battlefield.
 
It seems that for some reason interception by David's Sling was not actively attempted and as a result was not necessary, but what was Iran's intention?
you must be joking. here is a video of 10 David's Sling interceptors being launched, and all failing to intercept anything:

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
An interesting re-reading of some claims about Iran's missile stockpile:

Iran has already launched approximately 20 MBRMs capable of hitting Israel in an exercise even before the April 2024 attack. The April 2024 attack was with 110-120 ballistic missiles. This October 1 attack was with 180 ballistic missiles according to Western sources. Iran has reportedly launched about 300 ballistic missiles in the two 2024 attacks according to Western sources. I think everyone doubts that Iran would spend even 5% of its stockpile to hit Israel in its latest attacks. A totally underestimated US intelligence assessment.
they estimated Iran had 100 MRBMs... that is funny
 
Preparation and writing Quranic aya on Iranian missile before attack zionist:

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Moreover when Tor M2 is near no MLRS can work. Their pure ballistic path makes really easy to intercept whenever GPS jamming is not working. Even Buk M2 systems have succeded in intercepting MLRS rockets. So ukros only use them where NATO assess them there are not such systems deployed.
There is something called saturation attack
 
Clobbering the cost wars. 'Field Marshall' ironically surmises that it's cheaper to let the incoming hit their targets rather than using $450M Arrows. Lewis is being challenged for throwing the 'Arrow is more expensive than the $50M SM-3'/interceptor around.

The '12' SM-3s used by the US are about $50M per interceptor (which there is no indication they reached their target either).

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Last edited:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


this is hilarious

BBC's security expert says he has been studying Iran's missiles and says Fattah-2 has only 400km range so it must have been used from Syria, making Syria complicit.

he confuses Fattah-2 for the Pakistan MLRS also called Fattah... which they show videos of (snippet below)... truly comical beyond belief...

not to mention he lists Iran's 3 main missile systems as Shahab-3, Haj Qasem, and Kheibar-Shekan... as soon as anyone mentions Shahab-3 I can already tell they have no knowledge of Iran's missile program

Screenshot 2024-10-05 at 22.34.03.png
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top