Chinese SAC - FC-31/J-35 5th Gen Stealth Aircraft

[Neocloud]

What ... what is this?

视频 - 微博

h5.video.weibo.com

Please tell me, this is NOT the advertisement for the FC-31 at the Zhuhai Airshow??!!!!

It’s a promotion of an in-game event collaboration between the game ‘Naraka: Bladepoint’ and AVIC featuring the FC-31, I’m not sure why AVIC agreed to this collaboration though….maybe it is a lead up for Zhuhai…

 

[Deino]

It’s a promotion of an in-game event collaboration between the game ‘Naraka: Bladepoint’ and AVIC featuring the FC-31, I’m not sure why AVIC agreed to this collaboration though….maybe it is a lead up for Zhuhai…
View attachment 71057

Thanks!

At least a FC-31 in this colour scheme would surely look impressive!

 

[Deino]

On Twitter/X I got this explanation:

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[Michael]

It’s a promotion of an in-game event collaboration between the game ‘Naraka: Bladepoint’ and AVIC featuring the FC-31, I’m not sure why AVIC agreed to this collaboration though….maybe it is a lead up for Zhuhai…
View attachment 71057

Damn capital has eroded my favorite things.

I can understand AVIC's need for capital, but they shouldn't have used the “FC-31” IP, which has been officially upgraded to the J35 series and is now part of the PLA family. We can't accept it being eroded by these secondary alien cultures.
AVIC can use its “南天门计划 Nantianmen Project” IP to cater to the capital market. After all, it is a specialized IP for the entertainment market.

 

[Deino]

So far clearest image of the J-35, J-15 & JL-10J mock-ups on deck of the PLANS-18 Fujian.(Image via @Jsport_三汽 from Weibo)

 

[Deino]

ld love to see a number



Unfortunately a faked one again ...

 

[Pakistan Space Agency]

View attachment 71187

Off-topic. Just curious.

Can fancy aircraft design like these ever work or are they just not suitable aerodynamically considering Earth's gravity, atmosphere, etc.?

 

[Michael]

Off-topic. Just curious.

Can fancy aircraft design like these ever work or are they just not suitable aerodynamically considering Earth's gravity, atmosphere, etc.?

This is a sci-fi IP.
The plane is a space-sky unmanned fighter that works mostly in outer space.
“Project Nantianmen" is a complete sci-fi IP with many types of fighters. Unlike other sci-fi IPs, "Project Nantianmen" is a sci-fi IP from a fighter design and manufacturing company (AVIC).

 

[Hendarto]

Highlights: J-35A flight demo, Y-20A ground demo, J-15T flight, J-15 ground.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[Deino]

Interesting!

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[Khansaheeb]

The first batch of WS19 has started production at the factory
The first customer of J35 will be the PLAAF
--------------From 624

Hope the J31s will have at least one reverse facing missile on the wing or fuselage so that if there is an enemy plane on its tail the rear plane can easily be shot down by the reverse facing air missile.

 

[Deino]

Hope the J31s will have at least one reverse facing missile on the wing or fuselage so that if there is an enemy plane on its tail the rear plane can easily be shot down by the reverse facing air missile.

Come on! So far NO operational fighter has this option and why or better to say how should an internally mounted AAM be possible if this? It's just a ridicolous idea.

 

[Khansaheeb]

Come on! So far NO operational fighter has this option and why or better to say how should an internally mounted AAM be possible if this? It's just a ridicolous idea.

No idea is rediculous in engineering, something that needs to be explored. Read so many stories and watched so many videos of one fighter shooting down another from the rear. But the solution is simple and easily implementable.

 

[Deino]

No idea is rediculous in engineering, something that needs to be explored. Read so many stories and watched so many videos of one fighter shooting down another from the rear. But the solution is simple and easily implementable.

No it is not, since otherwise others would have already implemented this "simple and easily implementable" solution! The Russian's once tried it on the Flanker (I think Su-34) but abandoned it later also since high-off-bore-sight targeting makes this option no longer necessary.

 

[Khansaheeb]

No it is not, since otherwise others would have already implemented this "simple and easily implementable" solution! The Russian's once tried it on the Flanker (I think Su-34) but abandoned it later also since high-off-bore-sight targeting makes this option no longer necessary.

So the cost of a rear EISA doen't justify losing an aircraft? Just because the Russians couldn't do it doesn't mean Pakistan and China can't do it?