Be dazzled
THINK TANK: CONSULTANT
And the Chinese were might happy.Hi,
Yessir---they love to donate to our cause---. Don't forget the stealth helicopter---.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And the Chinese were might happy.Hi,
Yessir---they love to donate to our cause---. Don't forget the stealth helicopter---.
25 Destroyers?Tughril (Type-54 A/P) class guided missile frigate.
PNS Tughril,
PNS Taimur,
PNS Tippu Sultan,
PNS Shah Jahan.
View attachment 75552
Warship Type | Quantity |
Frigates | 9 |
Corvettes | 8 |
Missile Boats | 8 |
Squadron Number, not number of ships25 Destroyers?
Surface ships currently in service.
Warship Type Quantity Frigates 9 Corvettes 8 Missile Boats 8
It depends on whether the Type 054A/P can support a larger SAM of that size. However, the PN will eventually carry out a MLU of the Type 054A/Ps (in 10-15 years), so by then, it'll have a long-range SAM of some kind.Can we upgrade LY-80 SAM with HQ-16FE in future?
Chinese military fans are already studying the possibility of HQ-16FE's 1 VLS unit carrying 4 missiles. ------ According to the information that has been released, since HQ-16FE adopts a wingless body design (only tail fins), its actual space occupied is slightly smaller than HQ-16 (LY-80). It has this possibility.Can we upgrade LY-80 SAM with HQ-16FE in future?


This is a completely wrong statement. The chief engineer of the HQ-16FE interviewed at the Zhuhai Air Show clearly stated that the launch unit size of the HQ-16FE is exactly the same as that of the HQ-16 and HQ-16B. The reason for this design is that any weapon system that fills the launch unit of the HQ-16 and HQ-16B can be replaced without any modification.Chinese military fans are already studying the possibility of HQ-16FE's 1 VLS unit carrying 4 missiles. ------ According to the information that has been released, since HQ-16FE adopts a wingless body design (only tail fins), its actual space occupied is slightly smaller than HQ-16 (LY-80). It has this possibility.
View attachment 110654
View attachment 110652
The naval versions of HQ-16 and HQ-16FE both use the H/AKJ-16 VLS launch platform.
The only technical problem may be the radar. HQ-16FE uses new technology, and the radar of 054A/P may not be able to support this missile. ------ According to relevant information, 054B will use HQ-16FE, and its radar system is much more advanced than 054A.
If one day the PLA Navy's 054A starts replacing the HQ-16 with the HQ-16FE, then there will be no technical obstacles for the 054A/P.
I think he is talking about quad packing the missiles for greater number. LY 80 is not quad packed as far as I know.This is a completely wrong statement. The chief engineer of the HQ-16FE interviewed at the Zhuhai Air Show clearly stated that the launch unit size of the HQ-16FE is exactly the same as that of the HQ-16 and HQ-16B. The reason for this design is that any weapon system that fills the launch unit of the HQ-16 and HQ-16B can be replaced without any modification.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.