Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

[KHORSHIDSIYAH1488]

The IR is the whole reason Iran can defend itself

Have you seen the Shah and his supporters in the west, the most harami debauched, confused mofos you ever seen in your life

Whose aim it is to be be subservient to the west, you should be proud you have a government standing up for Iran and the region during a period of time where power lies in the west

History will note the cowardice of the Arab regimes and how Iran stood up

Reza Pahlavi supporters are mostly Jews or cucked, low-IQ Iranian libertines who can barely speak Persian. In the case of the latter, they are the dalghaks of our race, in the case of the former, they aren't Iranian, and should not be considered Iranian. Any future government of Iran should hasten the deportation of the remaining 25,000 Jews in Iran, they have their own country now.

Here's the problem. The Shah (Mohammad Reza) built Iran into a state of the art military with a GDP growing by 14%, it was faster growth than South Korea, his White Revolution was about fixing Iran culturally, infrastructrually, technologically, and land-wise to prepare Iran not only for survival in the modern world, but to attain great power status. Interference of foreign intelligence and subversive elements in Iran prevented this, but most of all falling out of favor with the Washington-Sanhedrin nexus as this would have meant Iran could play hardball, as Iran did with the 1973 oil crisis. During his reign countries like Iraq didn't dare force Iran, things were solved diplomatically, although he conceded too much in my opinion. Once he was gone and Khomeini rid the military of its best minds, changed the entire military doctrine and exalted a group of fanatical volunteers over the professionals, Saddam invaded with sheer force, speed and brutality, and nearly destroyed us.

The Islamic Republic should have learned from this. They've shown weakness. A weird Shi'ite tendency of showing weakness, provoking, then playing out the masochistic martyrdom posture, a cycle reminiscent of Hussein's needless rebellion which resulted in his and his tribes undisputed, senseless, completely avoidable slaughter. This story is like a programming script in the mind of Shi'ites, especially revolutionary ones- rebel, protest, provoke a far stronger foe, get killed, die, achieve martyrdom, and cry about it. Jews have a similar internal programming where they aspire to power, mistreat the Goyim, subvert them, and then antagonize them, get clapped to oblivion, and cry about it for centuries, adding it to the tally of their deprivations since escaping Egypt. For both groups its cultural, philosophical, and programmed.

The Islamic Republic provoked the US and Israel, two superior powers. When it came to be, it provoked the USSR as well. Iran was unable to get spare parts or weapons to fight Iraq. We sent thousands of boys to be slaughtered by Iraqis, in a desperate bid to break the invaders' morale. Why did Iranian government do this? Because they are painfully Shi'ite in the sense that this programmed cycle is what guides them in life. We did not need to shoot ourselves in the foot, but we did. And every Shi'ite movement from 1979 onward has done this, every movement that sprung forth from Khomeini and Shariati's ideas. No matter the pretensions to regional power, the Islamic Republic had defeated itself from the start. And taken all of us Iranians along for the ride.

 

[Persian Gulf]

It seems that you have not seen the images of the impacts. There are about 10 accurate impacts in nevatim air base.

The rest of the collisions that are not accurate are due to less accurate missiles such as Qadr and Emad.

I recently posted a full analysis of the satellite images

10 accurate impacts includes runways/side roads, not buildings. only 4 buildings/structures were hit at Nevatim (2 with severe damage, and 2 with very light damage).

Tel Nof we saw video evidence of 10+ impacts including one serious impact but no satellite imagery was released.

 

[hussain0216]

Reza Pahlavi supporters are mostly Jews or cucked, low-IQ Iranian libertines who can barely speak Persian. In the case of the latter, they are the dalghaks of our race, in the case of the former, they aren't Iranian, and should not be considered Iranian. Any future government of Iran should hasten the deportation of the remaining 25,000 Jews in Iran, they have their own country now.

Here's the problem. The Shah (Mohammad Reza) built Iran into a state of the art military with a GDP growing by 14%, it was faster growth than South Korea, his White Revolution was about fixing Iran culturally, infrastructrually, technologically, and land-wise to prepare Iran not only for survival in the modern world, but to attain great power status. Interference of foreign intelligence and subversive elements in Iran prevented this, but most of all falling out of favor with the Washington-Sanhedrin nexus as this would have meant Iran could play hardball, as Iran did with the 1973 oil crisis. During his reign countries like Iraq didn't dare force Iran, things were solved diplomatically, although he conceded too much in my opinion. Once he was gone and Khomeini rid the military of its best minds, changed the entire military doctrine and exalted a group of fanatical volunteers over the professionals, Saddam invaded with sheer force, speed and brutality, and nearly destroyed us.

The Islamic Republic should have learned from this. They've shown weakness. A weird Shi'ite tendency of showing weakness, provoking, then playing out the masochistic martyrdom posture, a cycle reminiscent of Hussein's needless rebellion which resulted in his and his tribes undisputed, senseless, completely avoidable slaughter. This story is like a programming script in the mind of Shi'ites, especially revolutionary ones- rebel, protest, provoke a far stronger foe, get killed, die, achieve martyrdom, and cry about it. Jews have a similar internal programming where they aspire to power, mistreat the Goyim, subvert them, and then antagonize them, get clapped to oblivion, and cry about it for centuries, adding it to the tally of their deprivations since escaping Egypt. For both groups its cultural, philosophical, and programmed.

The Islamic Republic provoked the US and Israel, two superior powers. When it came to be, it provoked the USSR as well. Iran was unable to get spare parts or weapons to fight Iraq. We sent thousands of boys to be slaughtered by Iraqis, in a desperate bid to break the invaders' morale. Why did Iranian government do this? Because they are painfully Shi'ite in the sense that this programmed cycle is what guides them in life. We did not need to shoot ourselves in the foot, but we did. And every Shi'ite movement from 1979 onward has done this, every movement that sprung forth from Khomeini and Shariati's ideas. No matter the pretensions to regional power, the Islamic Republic had defeated itself from the start. And taken all of us Iranians along for the ride.

Some of what you say is true, but other is false

Without the I.R, Iran would be another defeated puppet in the middle east no different to Egypt and the other Arabs

The odds were stacked against you from the beginning, and in the current world order the U.S and west reign supreme, although we are now seeing the cracks and possibly the start of the down fall alongside the demographic crisis brewing in the west and across the world

Even with the odds stacked for heavily against Iran, iran under the circumstances has done incredibly well just to survive and keep going

This is a civilisational battle, and this is no time to break rank and pussey out

 

[KHORSHIDSIYAH1488]

Some of what you say is true, but other is false

Without the I.R, Iran would be another defeated puppet in the middle east no different to Egypt and the other Arabs

The odds were stacked against you from the beginning, and in the current world order the U.S and west reign supreme, although we are now seeing the cracks and possibly the start of the down fall alongside the demographic crisis brewing in the west and across the world

Even with the odds stacked for heavily against Iran, iran under the circumstances has done incredibly well just to survive and keep going

This is a civilisational battle, and this is no time to break rank and pussey out

I'm not pussying out. I am a turbofascist and think Iran's problem is incompetent and naive leadership. We need an uncompromising, ruthless government that believes in our right to exist and is ready to bring real pain and misery to those who would dare besmirch Iran.

 

[BigMela2onin]

Let me refrase the sentence for you:

Don't worry, Iran will give both to you!

Come on @BigMela2onin! How did you not let him have it on this one? With pun intended. He @OldTwilight iterally "opened" himself up to this response

Don't believe me? US flag was missing on the ground on the latest missile base reveal. Soon it will be flying over the entrance instead as part of the disarmament treaty. Iran's negotiating position is weaker than ever and they have no way of strengthening that they aren't too afraid to go forward with. West kept escalating and Iran kept backing down until it backed itself into a corner. At least Putin had the sense to counter escalate in Ukraine. Fortune favors the bold and Khamenei and the IRGC are too timid.

 

[KHORSHIDSIYAH1488]

Don't believe me? US flag was missing on the ground on the latest missile base reveal. Soon it will be flying over the entrance instead as part of the disarmament treaty. Iran's negotiating position is weaker than ever and they have no way of strengthening that they aren't too afraid to go forward with. West kept escalating and Iran kept backing down until it backed itself into a corner. At least Putin had the sense to counter escalate in Ukraine. Fortune favors the bold and Khamenei and the IRGC are too timid.

Once disarmament begins, then the chop-chop begins. One of the reasons I think behind the capital move. Tehran would be too close to the new border with Aliyev.

 

[Persian Gulf]

Don't believe me? US flag was missing on the ground on the latest missile base reveal. Soon it will be flying over the entrance instead as part of the disarmament treaty. Iran's negotiating position is weaker than ever and they have no way of strengthening that they aren't too afraid to go forward with. West kept escalating and Iran kept backing down until it backed itself into a corner. At least Putin had the sense to counter escalate in Ukraine. Fortune favors the bold and Khamenei and the IRGC are too timid.

IRGC spouted revolutionary anti-Americanism for decades and when the time comes that the USA might want a war suddenly they become less zealous about it and remove the US flag to avoid provoking a sensitive man child POTUS

 

[GWXP]

Iran also needs to work on missiles which can hit Diego garcia.

This year Iran will unveil the Qaem 105 missile which might have a range of 5000km with 1000kg warhead.

With such a missile Iran will be able to target US aerial refueling tankers, AWACs, transport aircrafts and strategic bombers in Diego Garcia, Ramstein Airbase in Germany, Aviano Airbase in Italy and all other US bases in Europe in the case of war.

Also Iran has Shahed-136B drone with the range of 4000km.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

So Iran's area denial will extend to 4000-5000km in the near future

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[Gabriel]

over half a dozen B2 bombers and over a dozen C17 Globe masters have arrived in Diego Garcia in the last 24 hours

anyone know what's going on ?

for Yemen

 

[LeGenD]

The IR is the whole reason Iran can defend itself

Have you seen the Shah and his supporters in the west, the most harami debauched, confused mofos you ever seen in your life

Whose aim it is to be be subservient to the west, you should be proud you have a government standing up for Iran and the region during a period of time where power lies in the west

History will note the cowardice of the Arab regimes and how Iran stood up

Like this

Shah created an advanced Iranian military force and no country in the region dared to touch Iran under his rule. More importantly, he was good to Pakistan.

When Iran supported Pakistan with arms in wars against India

Iran was the first country to recognise Pakistan and supplied it with much-needed weapons during the wars with India in 1965 and 1971. How did the two countries become such close allies, and what is souring their ties?

www.indiatoday.in

How Iran Once Sought To Prevent Pakistan’s Breakup

It is possible that the account of the 1971 war might have been different had Yahya Khan followed the Shah’s advice to engage peacefully with the East

thefridaytimes.com

Your hatred for him is unwarranted. I have seen people who are supposedly religious but corrupt and mistreat others. Never judge a book by its cover. Shah was at least an honest personality, he had a secular outlook and never pretended to be otherwise.

 

[Mehdipersian]

Like this

Shah created an advanced Iranian military force and no country in the region dared to touch Iran under his rule. More importantly, he was good to Pakistan.

When Iran supported Pakistan with arms in wars against India

Iran was the first country to recognise Pakistan and supplied it with much-needed weapons during the wars with India in 1965 and 1971. How did the two countries become such close allies, and what is souring their ties?

www.indiatoday.in

How Iran Once Sought To Prevent Pakistan’s Breakup

It is possible that the account of the 1971 war might have been different had Yahya Khan followed the Shah’s advice to engage peacefully with the East

thefridaytimes.com

Your hatred for him is unwarranted. I have seen people who are supposedly religious but corrupt and mistreat others. Never judge a book by its cover. Shah was at least an honest personality, he had a secular outlook and never pretended to be otherwise.

The Shah was a dictator who needed weapons to protect his family and wealth.

For this, he served the West and America. His relations with Pakistan were also due to the fact that Pakistan and Iran were both in the Western group and were in front of the Soviet Union.

A complete puppet.

 

[LeGenD]

The Shah was a dictator who needed weapons to protect his family and wealth.

For this, he served the West and America. His relations with Pakistan were also due to the fact that Pakistan and Iran were both in the Western group and were in front of the Soviet Union.

A complete puppet.

How you or Iranians on a broader level perceive him is your internal matter and I can respect that and your sentiment. However, Pakistan has a culture of hospitality and Pakistani should remember those who were good to Pakistan fondly. Mullah types are usually intolerant and look down on others without introspection, this needs to stop (not saying you are one but this is an unfortunate trend).

 

[hussain0216]

Like this

Shah created an advanced Iranian military force and no country in the region dared to touch Iran under his rule. More importantly, he was good to Pakistan.

When Iran supported Pakistan with arms in wars against India

Iran was the first country to recognise Pakistan and supplied it with much-needed weapons during the wars with India in 1965 and 1971. How did the two countries become such close allies, and what is souring their ties?

www.indiatoday.in

How Iran Once Sought To Prevent Pakistan’s Breakup

It is possible that the account of the 1971 war might have been different had Yahya Khan followed the Shah’s advice to engage peacefully with the East

thefridaytimes.com

Your hatred for him is unwarranted. I have seen people who are supposedly religious but corrupt and mistreat others. Never judge a book by its cover. Shah was at least an honest personality, he had a secular outlook and never pretended to be otherwise.

He was a patsy, no different to the fake leaders set up in the Arab world, the aim was to make docile subservient states that would serve western, U.S and Israeli aims to slowly break down the connection to history, faith and culture


Iran was the only country to break free of the hold through the revolution,
Since then their has been WORLDWIDE sanctions a d constant pressure to destroy Iran and being it down, the fact that Iran is standing is incredible

Nothing is perfect, neither is the I.R but iranians should be proud they made a stand and those trying to put Iran back in the stranglehold of the west and Jews are stupid

 

[LeGenD]

He was a patsy, no different to the fake leaders set up in the Arab world, the aim was to make docile subservient states that would serve western, U.S and Israeli aims to slowly break down the connection to history, faith and culture


Iran was the only country to break free of the hold through the revolution,
Since then their has been WORLDWIDE sanctions a d constant pressure to destroy Iran and being it down, the fact that Iran is standing is incredible

Nothing is perfect, neither is the I.R but iranians should be proud they made a stand and those trying to put Iran back in the stranglehold of the west and Jews are stupid

Khomeini launched a revolution from a sleepy French village

NEAUPHLE-LE-CHATEAU, France (AP) — From a sleepy village outside Paris, the man who would become the supreme leader of the Islamic Republic of Iran sat cross-legged beneath an apple tree, delivering messages daily to hundreds of followers clamoring to glimpse the glowering cleric in the black turban

apnews.com

The Western Hemisphere is not a monolith and different Western countries have competing interests as well as questionable role in the affairs of other countries. The US will bomb a European country back to the stone age if the American deep state finds a good enough reason for it. The US bombed Yugoslavia back to the stone age for instance.

Absolutely nobody is perfect. You can certainly point out flaws of Shah as an independent person and I can respect it but I am just pointing out that Pakistani should respect those who were good to Pakistan - not many out there but Shah was.

 

[Tijani]

Khomeini launched a revolution from a sleepy French village

NEAUPHLE-LE-CHATEAU, France (AP) — From a sleepy village outside Paris, the man who would become the supreme leader of the Islamic Republic of Iran sat cross-legged beneath an apple tree, delivering messages daily to hundreds of followers clamoring to glimpse the glowering cleric in the black turban

apnews.com

The Western Hemisphere is not a monolith and different Western countries have competing interests as well as questionable role in the affairs of other countries. The US will bomb a European country back to the stone age if the American deep state finds a good enough reason for it. The US bombed Venezuela back to the stone age for instance.

You're right partially on this one. There's an internal hierarchy between the zionist West. A pecking order of sorts where your value depends on whether your ancestry is historically from the western parts of Europe, the Anglo-Saxon alliance. There is a reason why it's called the WEST.
Even within this coalition there's hierarchy, henceforth the FUKUS coalition is higher on the peeking order than say the PIGS, and they in there turn matter more than all Eastern Europeans.
Despite taking all this into consideration once must though understand that for a nation set for destruction by the West they're all the same because their align when it comes to taking advantage. Let's say you're Venezuela, then they're all the same pack of vultures.
By the way I think you're confusing Venezuela with another country. US, as far as I know, has never engaged in open hostilities with Venezuela.

Absolutely nobody is perfect. You can certainly point out flaws of Shah as an independent person and I can respect it but I am just pointing out that Pakistani should respect those who were good to Pakistan - not many out there but Shah was.

Nobody is perfect but looking the larger picture the man was a detrimental force. You're though in right of appreciating whatever good he did for your country.