Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Beyond the threat of escalation and the usual economic matters, why Fatah 1 only?
Purely strategic / tactical question.
Especially, when your HALE/MALE drones with EW/EA/ELINT/Imaging suits lock them for a precise round....Fatah 2 was also used, Fatah 2 is much heavier with a range of 400km
Both are faster and cheaper to use then cruise missiles
So I'm fine with their use
We need to go over our air defenses with an eye towards the munitions India is likely to use, and not so much the Jets. Loitering munitions will only increase and we need relatively simple AA guns linked to modern AESA radars and EO/IR systems as well as anti-drone drones to knock them out. All modestly priced but highly effective, as Ukraine has shown. The Turks, in NATO, can brief us on what nato has found worked and didn’t work in Ukraine.
We need full air field level dispersal capabilities on all our motorways. Ammo and fuel dumps, engineering equipment, etc. all hidden throughout the country; the Swedish/Swiss style.
Btw, a Perun video just dropped on the Pakistani military strategy. He is one of the best at analysis on the big picture:
May be production issueBeyond the threat of escalation and the usual economic matters, why Fatah 1 only?
Purely strategic / tactical question.
We also need to be more mobile and dispersed with our jamming equipment and surveillance equipment on the ground. Toyota hilux across three trucks can carry 1. jammers cued by eo/ir camera and datalink, 2. radar and e/o gear on mast and 3. Gun mounted systems with radar and Eo/ir sensors to distribute lethality across the battlespace.Point defence enhancement with missiles, CIWS, Laser and Microwave weapons.
Latest potent SAM procurement with manufacturing rights and expedite efforts for self reliance with the aim of quantity and quality.
Harden and hidden bunkers for value able assets no tin daba big hangers, recent hits on bases are clear example.
HAS on airbases should be stretched on wide area, possibly some ground Tunnels with lifts, distinct in layout, not like 4 on start and on 6 end with same pattern on all air bases.
Same applied for command bunkers on different places.
Move the NCA commands to nearby mountains.
I think we lack Bharamos style supersonic missile. We should develop longer version via HD-1 or some other Chinese missile. It should be with different variants for tri services.
I don't understand we could not use our own,Turkish or Chinese UCAVS with full results just like Armenia war.


Expensive i guess.First question I want to start with why did we not see stocks of cruise missiles used?
View attachment 119609


I suspect if the air battle had gone the other way, and the Rafale had lived up to its own hype, Pakistan would have been more inclined to use its CM reserves.Don't forget, India had to use its expensive Brahmos CM. They wanted to somehow cover up and compensate weaknesses of IAF.
But on the contrary, Pakistani side didn't deem it necessary to waste its highly valuable and expensive reserves of cruise missiles that have Chinese origin for its obvious superiority in air battle during a short term conflict.
They are reserves for doomsday, i guess.
It's almost next to impossible for both countries being neighbours.PAF bases also hit shows air defence needs to layered to a far greater degree.
Next to, but not completely.It's almost next to impossible for both countries being neighbours.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.