Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So if PAF had shot down more aircraft in Air Battle - Indians would have stopped?Yes, this is a gap that we need to plug somehow.
Let me explain myself more a little. As I said, the wildly successful PAF air battle took place on the first night. After this skirmish, both airforces were essentially not flying for several nights. We were "showing restraint" or whatever. During this time India was constantly attacking us with LMs and on the final night with BMs and Brahmos. Had the night 1 PAF-IAF skirmish been a deterrent, would the conflict continued after that? So that shows that PAF shooting down 5 aircraft is not a deterrent for what India wanted to achieve.
Another point on why I think deterrence failed. I should say conventional deterrence failed. India was continuing with their belligerence until the very last moment when US intervened. I don't buy either sides narrative on the other side running to US because:
A. US refused to intervene before.
B. Pakistan did not run to the US because Pakistan HAD to respond otherwise Pakistan should've surrendered to India.
C. India did not run to the US because they were willing to escalate till the absolute tipping point to see the boundary
What most likely happened (this is my guess) is that Pakistan skipped a few steps on the escalation ladder and started launched BMs and MAYBE doing some movement on nuclear assets. I say this because that's the only thing that could've suddenly forced the US to intervene and India to accept this intervention. Assuming that this is true, this is a failure of our conventional deterrence because we had to resort to our nuclear deterrence. You might argue this is what nuclear weapons are for but this increasing conventional weakness on our side is creating a dangerously unstable environment. Lowering the nuclear threshold is not good for either side - we need to really work on our conventional deterrence.
No. Unlikely. I dont get how what im saying keeps getting misinterpeted. I must be doing a terrible job at writing down my thoughts. The balance of damage was wildly in our favour at that point. To attempt to correct it, they hit back next night with tonnes of LMs. THIS is when we should've responded at least in kind instead of waiting for days.So if PAF had shot down more aircraft in Air Battle - Indians would have stopped?
I will say Humor, Humility and Music...No two opinions about it. I wish my qaum could learn humor and humility from your nation, especially the Punjabis. I am sorry to say that most of my online countrymen, particularly my fellow Bhakts are a humorless, crass and bilious lot.
I am hypothesizing that the PAF exposed more of its capabilities for less of a gain whereas India is holding onto a lot of its capabilities keeping China in mind.No. Unlikely. I dont get how what im saying keeps getting misinterpeted. I must be doing a terrible job at writing down my thoughts. The balance of damage was wildly in our favour at that point. To attempt to correct it, they hit back next night with tonnes of LMs. THIS is when we should've responded at least in kind instead of waiting for days.
With all due respect, I think you’re giving them too much credit. They were desperate to teach Pakistan a lesson (still are) and cement their regional hegemony. They threw everything they had / could including the kitchen sink and came up severely wanting. After this performance against Pakistan, I can’t imagine what they could possibly have held back that would give them a cat in hells chance against China.I am hypothesizing that the PAF exposed more of its capabilities for less of a gain whereas India is holding onto a lot of its capabilities keeping China in mind.
Yes you can.The post on Indian Pakistan war. Can I steal it?![]()
Yeah. Their missile capability is way superior than ours.I am hypothesizing that the PAF exposed more of its capabilities for less of a gain whereas India is holding onto a lot of its capabilities keeping China in mind.
Nothing too deep here. You do in combat what you prepare for in training. When all your training and doctrine is limited to defending against a larger enemy, you do what we all saw.I am hypothesizing that the PAF exposed more of its capabilities for less of a gain whereas India is holding onto a lot of its capabilities keeping China in mind.
I think India is the one exposing everything due to desperation to save face. They essentially threw in the kitchen sink after that 5:0 incident. You have to understand the Indian psyche, it is all about ego and face saving. Look you send in SCALPS, BRAHMOS, S400, some got jammed, some had complete seekers, SCALPS were particularly important finds, complete seeker. We can do alot with those missiles. Who the heck throws in few dozen HAROPs unless they were acting out of emotion?I am hypothesizing that the PAF exposed more of its capabilities for less of a gain whereas India is holding onto a lot of its capabilities keeping China in mind.
It was the largest air battle in modern history.I am hypothesizing that the PAF exposed more of its capabilities for less of a gain whereas India is holding onto a lot of its capabilities keeping China in mind.
You have always been giving the benefits of the doubt to the Bharatis! And, it's been working perfectly with them....I am hypothesizing that the PAF exposed more of its capabilities for less of a gain whereas India is holding onto a lot of its capabilities keeping China in mind.
Imagine holding off an air force twice as large, forcing them into hiding 200km away. Only Pakistan can do that. Economically 10x smaller yet forced them into a ceasefire. You guys got our respect.It was the largest air battle in modern history.
40 on our side vs 72 on theirs.
Tactics & training won the day.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.