JF-17 - Updates, News & Discussion

[Ak01]

Again all these are on the ground ..I have never seen one flying

 

[Taimoor]

View attachment 127230

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[Pakistanithinktank]

I think PAC just wants to move ahead with JF-17 project, mainly focusing external customers and upgrading Block 2 jets to Block 3 standards. Apparently, Block 1 won’t get the upgrade, which is kinda odd, but I don’t know the full reason. Also sounds like Block 4 is off the table for now. Maybe they’re shifting focus to the AZM program? That one’s supposed to include multiple projects, including the 5th-gen fighter stuff. Correct me if I’m wrong.

 

[ghazi52]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[RafaleSlayer]

Again all these are on the ground ..I have never seen one flying

don't worry even the Indian pilots wont see it flying, actually they won't even see its missiles flying to blow their ass

 

[Be dazzled]

Per the sources Thunders have actively taken over as the Arabian sea and coast guardians. 5PAs no longer active.

 

[airhead]

View attachment 128833

I meant with 4 pl15s

 

[airhead]

Why do you need a flying picture?

It shows that it can actually carry 4 missiles

 

[airhead]

Worh azeris pak

All i am saying its irrelevant, you have ground photos and official documentations

Nah..why haven’t we seen jf17 a flying with 4x pl15s or sd10s? We see plenty of pics of j10s with this configuration

 

[diaspora]

Nah..why haven’t we seen jf17 a flying with 4x pl15s or sd10s? We see plenty of pics of j10s with this configuration

Give it a rest, the PAF isn't your personal papparazzi. If you dont believe in our capability, you are welcome to come test us. Bring the Tejas.

 

[Oscar]

It shows that it can actually carry 4 missiles

So the on ground picture with 4 missiles is not proof enough. But we need to satisfy your need to see it with 4 missiles in the air?

I see - why exactly - who are you?

 

[Psyko70]

So the on ground picture with 4 missiles is not proof enough. But we need to satisfy your need to see it with 4 missiles in the air?

I see - why exactly - who are you?

Ignoring is the best offense. In this case

 

[m52k85]

pg 36, July 2025 issue of Airforce Monthly:
(Likely inaccurate news in my view)



The Ops Sindoor article from pg 31 to 37 is not written by Alan Warnes, who has access to PAF and gets first hand info. Rather it is written by Babak Taghvaee an expat Iranian dissident; known Susrali lover and Pakistan hater. @Pakistan Space Agency

We would have seen a couple of more squadrons converted to Jf-17 if PAF indeed had 200 units comprising 50 block 3s.

 

[Pakistan Space Agency]

pg 36, July 2025 issue of Airforce Monthly:
(Likely inaccurate news in my view)

View attachment 129424

The Ops Sindoor article from pg 31 to 37 is not written by Alan Warnes, who has access to PAF and gets first hand info. Rather it is written by Babak Taghvaee an expat Iranian dissident; known Susrali lover and Pakistan hater. @Pakistan Space Agency

We would have seen a couple of more squadrons converted to Jf-17 if PAF indeed had 200 units comprising 50 block 3s.

You are correct.

The article also mentions Block-1s upgrading to Block-3, which is not correct. I think they're only getting their airframes upgraded or MLUd. Other experts on the forum will be able to better clarify this.

 

[Pakistan Space Agency]

So the on ground picture with 4 missiles is not proof enough. But we need to satisfy your need to see it with 4 missiles in the air?

I see - why exactly - who are you?

Probably James Bond 007.