Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Look at the posts right above this one. That is the true performance of these nikammay gernails.Why would they be with the jawans? They have a specific job to do, and doing ride alongs in the middle of nowhere isn't one of them
They need to implement long term.plans and policy, from bringing down Afghanistan, kicking out the U.S and NATO, defeating India in the recent conflict they have achieved reasonable results
They need to go harder against Afghan and some baloch areas , go full hostile against the enemy
Given how these ‘landlords’ treat the locals, do you really think this alone is enough?Pakistan has all the landlords on its side
These landlords are the real dubious bastards who feed the insurgency, even provide them intel.Why is it they never get hit but the Army does, despite them being on our side....Given how these ‘landlords’ treat the locals, do you really think this alone is enough?
Can’t focus solely on kinetic actions with so called ‘support from landlords’ when the landlords are part of the socio-economic issues in Balochistan.
Also the problem is the ROE restrictions. Soldiers are not allowed to shoot on reasonable suspicion, for the fear of 'Baloch groups' protesting using the ignorant women and children as human shields. This is the looser mindset...The terrain simply favors the insurgents. It’s huge with plenty of routes based on local knowledge and support.
Unless you go completely scorched earth and kill everything that isn’t on four legs and not wearing a uniform - there is no military solution to this.
Absolutely - but my point is that landlord support or not, you can’t defeat insurgencies without socio-economic development and growth and the larger population buying into the political and constitutional process.These landlords are the real dubious bastards who feed the insurgency, even provide them intel.Why is it they never get hit but the Army does, despite them being on our side....
Do you really think that ROE’s prevented engagement in these remote ambushes and that actionable intel can only be obtained if ‘RoE’s don’t prevent shooting civilians’?Also the problem is the ROE restrictions. Soldiers are not allowed to shoot on reasonable suspicion, for the fear of 'Baloch groups' protesting using the ignorant women and children as human shields. This is the looser mindset...
This is criminal murder and whoever is in charge of such mishaps happening for the past 5 years needs to be hanged
I don't care how much of a loyalist boot licker you are sending soldiers to their demise without a fighting chance inside Toyota tin cans is murder.
ROE restrictions certainly embolden the facilitators who mock and interfere with patrols regularly and also do much needed recon, for the actual terrorists. These facilitators also provide refuge to the terrorists on the run after such ambushes and hide them behind their own women and children. If we break their doors down then again that Baloch group BS. We must talk from the barrel or butt of the gun and root out the facilitators. Raheel Sharif used to mention these, 'aiders, abetters, facilitators financiers and sympathizers'. I don't know if he had a plan for them as well. Any way water under the bridge.......Do you really think that ROE’s prevented engagement in these remote ambushes and that actionable intel can only be obtained if ‘RoE’s don’t prevent shooting civilians’?
Don’t you think that the lack of development and the lack of Baloch ownership in the political process play a critical role in allowing recruits to terrorist groups?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.