India Lucky Not To Lose More Than Four Rafales

[Mighty_Dragon_Strike]

Did PAF use JDAMS

no, they said, missiles specifically with Beidou navigation

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[Areesh]

No, the French word "rentrez en toute sécurité" also means evacuation over safe area, which jn this contect stands for ejection.
So to summarise:
1. The article never ever indicated it was two separate jets
2. While it used the word (returning safely), it never said that it returned to base or landed back.

Now you are playing with french words. It only means come home safely and not evacuation over safe area and all that

Article clearly safe this one particular Rafale made it back safe after getting hit. The one in Bhatinda didn't come back safely. So this confirms two hits

You ar just twisting obvious simple meanings of this article to deny a reality. Won't work with me though

 

[TopGun786]

The sight of some of your prized birds not returning to base and then one limping trailing thick black smoke and parts missing must be soul destroying for the fellow pilots and ground crew .

No wonder they were grounded for at least two days then. Imagine the shock which IAF and Indian government went through.

 

[TopGun786]

it is a PAF and pak forumers fantasm.
One was grounded, and only indian side know why.
Probably some more injured.

Hi Bon plan

 

[Vapnope]

Rafales can fly without engines is the new information to me. About time people stop paying for the engines and just get airframe from France. Great going !

 

[Tejas Spokesman]

Now you are playing with french words. It only means come home safely and not evacuation over safe area and all that

Article clearly safe this one particular Rafale made it back safe after getting hit. The one in Bhatinda didn't come back safely. So this confirms two hits

You ar just twisting obvious simple meanings of this article to deny a reality. Won't work with me though

It's funny to see pot calling the kettle black.
Article clearly mentioned only one Rafale, period.
All claims that it means two are mere conjectures at this point to support own hallucinations and absolutely contrary to what the article mentions.

 

[TopGun786]

Now that's just made up stuff.
Nowhere did the article mention it was a different Rafale.
Infact the same website (which is actually more of a blog) explicitly states in its article on May clash that only one Rafale was lost.

So apparently on Rafael (tail no 001) was scattered into bits and still landed safely

 

[maxpane]

tail 001 returned with the help of shakti maan.

 

[Areesh]

It's funny to see pot calling the kettle black.
Article clearly mentioned only one Rafale, period.
All claims that it means two are mere conjectures at this point to support own hallucinations and absolutely contrary to what the article mentions.

Article clearly said that one made it back safely

This is not coming back safely



So clear proof of two rafales bring hit

 

[Mighty_Dragon_Strike]

sidhu sahib is not without blame, in fact, when the dust settles n he is gone, he will be mentioned in the list of chiefs with the most financial irregularities during their tenure. The white paper was basically outlining that.

PAF today, is what the stones (sound stones!) which were set in 1960s.

in few years, we will know, where current leadership has led us to!

although, there is one big unknown here, which is, change of weapons supplier!

 

[Yasser76]

sidhu sahib is not without blame, in fact, when the dust settles n he is gone, he will be mentioned in the list of chiefs with the most financial irregularities during their tenure. The white paper was basically outlining that.

Possibly true, but more remembered for crushing IAF.

When it comes to financial irregularities, tragically, we have no shortage of flag ranks here....

 

[Charles_Martel]

Does losing a single aircraft forces any airforce to be grounded for two days

Not a single fighter was grounded.
IAF takes time to analyse the situation (they made an error underestimating the Pakistan reaction) and the 2nd phase of operation was more successfull, with nearly no air opposition from PAF.

 

[Charles_Martel]

Article clearly said that one made it back safely

This is not coming back safely

View attachment 141962

So clear proof of two rafales bring hit

explain me how you can be so sure this pic is about a Rafale ?

 

[TopGun786]

explain me how you can be so sure this pic is about a Rafale ?

How can you be sure that you are not Bon Plan?

 

[Ali_Baba]

Possibly true, but more remembered for crushing IAF.

When it comes to financial irregularities, tragically, we have no shortage of flag ranks here....

Hopefully Sidhu takes his pound of flesh(corruption unfortunately) and his fame via combat victory, and retires soon so that the next generation of leaders can take the help. PAF needs to innovate, and innovation comes through change.

It is a challenge that will never stop for the PAF, and us such it must always be dynamic.