Egyptian Armed Forces

Watandar said:
In case of a conflict with Israel, no matter how long it lasts, Egypt will need supplies of fuel, ammunition and spare parts. The Israelis will get everything for free from America, sadly, but where will Egypt get it from ?
Click to expand...

from Turkiye , Pakistan , China , Iran , S.Arabia , Russia , N.Korea
 
Military agreement between Egypt and Pakistan

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
The SC said:
Military agreement between Egypt and Pakistan

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
Click to expand...

can you sum up some points
its in arabic . unfortunately we cant understand it
 
maxpane said:
can you sum up some points
its in arabic . unfortunately we cant understand it
Click to expand...
It’s saying that Egypt is exploring to officialize deeper military ties to procure Pakistani weapons such as their Raaid cruise missiles and Babur drones. And perhaps a possibility to help share nuclear tech know-how or to be under the same umbrella with Saudi in a united Islamic nato style alliance.
 
Ramses Akhenaten Ahmose said:
It’s saying that Egypt is exploring to officialize deeper military ties to procure Pakistani weapons such as their Raaid cruise missiles and Babur drones. And perhaps a possibility to help share nuclear tech know-how or to be under the same umbrella with Saudi in a united Islamic nato style alliance.
Click to expand...
thanks a lot . tahts much helpful brother
 
The SC said:
Military agreement between Egypt and Pakistan

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
Click to expand...

where’s everyone else that use to make this forum active? It seems that only the 2 of us are now carrying this thread and even then I’m not really posting like you
 
maxpane said:
i tried but could not get it
Click to expand...
Here is the full transcript..
You can open the video in YouTube and fallow the transcript..

(0:00:00) A military agreement between Egypt and Pakistan terrifies Israel. When the winds of war blow and the decisions of politicians cloud, countries do not wait for the sympathy of major capitals. Whoever has a safety net creates it, and here the story begins. Egypt and Pakistan are a new line of contact between the two Easts, and an alliance written this time in the language of factories and maneuvers, not in the language of courtesy.
(0:00:28) The region is on the brink of ignition, and no one possesses the luxury of neutrality. Cairo is moving towards partnerships that add weight, not noise. Manufacturing capabilities, transfer of expertise, and maneuvers speak for themselves. In contrast, Islamabad possesses what many lack: a self-sufficient weapons school and an armament program that aims to be independent of the whims of suppliers. And with every practical step, the definition of power changes.
(0:00:55) Production lines that ensure local ammunition and parts. Technology transfer contracts that create skills. No labels on the box and local maintenance that keeps systems in service when supply doors close. The maneuvers here are not press photos, but standardized communication protocols and clear engagement procedures.
(0:01:16) And a short decision chain measured in seconds from monitoring to implementation on the other side, Islamabad offers a complete package of fighters, tanks, cruise missiles, and drones built with the philosophy of sufficiency and lessons of war economy that reduce operating costs and eliminate the extortion of the spare parts sector.
(0:01:38) A new era of military power and joint manufacturing. An alliance that closes the gaps in ammunition, time, and knowledge at the same time. Whispers of peaceful nuclear cooperation that translate into training cadres, managing reactors, and industrial safety that raises the level of sovereignty. In the background, the features of a broad Islamic military alliance.
(0:01:59) Egyptian political and military weight, Pakistani industrial capacity, Gulf economic depth, and a Turkish operational arm, eastern levers that open the door to realism and reduce the cost of dependency. The result is not noise, but rather a cold balance of power that reduces the scope of surprise and raises the cost of error for its opponents.
(0:02:21) Whoever bets on emptiness will find a stage busy with procedures, and whoever tests readiness will discover that testing is no longer without a price. Here, policy is written with working tools, not with unforgettable slogans. From closed rooms to the work schedule, successive meetings in Cairo: ministers, chiefs of staff, and officials responsible for military production at one table. The file is open on three tracks.
(0:02:48) Joint manufacturing of weapons and ammunition, a logistical support system, with explicit calls for Pakistani companies to participate in upcoming Egyptian exhibitions and programs, localization of technology, not a passing deal, operation and training, expanding maneuvers, unifying communication protocols, and raising the ability to work together from a slogan to procedures.
(0:03:10) Peaceful nuclear energy, expertise in operating small and medium reactors, and cadre preparation programs are a technical lever that reduces dependence on foreign countries in the long term. In parallel, a broader arc is forming on the other side: defense agreements in the Gulf, Turkish influence in the East, and technical support from major Asian partners. All of these are threads that feed the same direction: independence of military decisions in the Arab and Islamic worlds.
(0:03:38) But what's on the table in terms of name and weaponry? The Al-Khaled tank: improved armor, advanced fire systems, and manufacturing expertise that allows for local development. The GF-17 fighter: the latest generation. Low operating costs. Flexible radars and weapons capabilities. A smart approach to expanding the fighter fleet without a stifling cost.
(0:04:03) A respectable operational range and the ability to handle conventional warheads and paper that raises the cost of aggression and increases the complexity of the opponent’s calculations. Combat and reconnaissance drones like Burak, an eye that never sleeps over borders and sea lines. Light and medium weapons are proven, documented alternatives and less expensive than Western systems. The point of all this is that a weapon is purchased for today’s mission.
(0:04:30) And a manufacturing chain is built for a tomorrow that does not wait for shipments. Nuclear weapons are the difficult language of peace. Pakistan has extensive nuclear experience and Egypt operates a peaceful nuclear project to secure energy. The meeting here is technically excellent. Training of reactor management cadres and a nuclear safety culture is built from the control room to a page in the operating manual. What is required is not a slogan but rather acquired skills.
(0:04:58) Safe operation, preventive maintenance, fault simulation, fuel consumption management, and logistics chains that do not break down at the first crisis. When this knowledge is transferred from books to minds, cognitive independence is created, reducing the need for any external crutch and fortifying the system against extortion of spare parts or emergency expert services.
(0:05:21) On the ground, this means creating joint qualification programs for engineers and operators, emergency simulation tests, and standardized procedures for safety, firefighting, and radiation briefing. It also means strengthening national oversight bodies and aligning protocols with international best practices so that facilities are managed with transparency and discipline, and traceability of flour materials closes the door to any ambiguity.
(0:05:47) Nuclear power here is civilian, providing stable electricity, supporting heavy industry, and providing strategic options such as desalination of seawater and reducing fluctuations in the fuel bill. As for the military, Cairo’s international obligations are clear and non-negotiable.
(0:06:05) But the transfer of peaceful expertise alone is sufficient to create energy sovereignty, raise the level of economic immunity, and give the general decision a solid backing. When the energy basket is diversified and its cost stabilizes, industrial planning becomes more sustainable and foreign policy becomes less sensitive to price extortion. In the end, what is being built here is not just a reactor.
(0:06:28) Rather, an army of engineers, operators, supervisors, and a language of precise procedures that make safety a daily culture, not a poster on the walls. That is the true value, the ability to work on the worst day and give the state the luxury of saying no when presented with unacceptable conditions.
(0:06:47) An indelible history and an unpostponable present. This is not the first thread between Cairo and Islam. After the October War, Pakistan said that Egypt’s battle is our battle and provided men and equipment. Later, the Guardians of the Sky and Thunder maneuvers came to bring the language of joint operations back to life.
(0:07:07) Air defense tactics, special operations, and experiments on silent platforms worried the enemy because they think outside the box. History here is not decoration. It is an investment in experience, not a banner raised for an expanding alliance and an equation being reformulated.
(0:07:25) When a Pakistani force armed with manufacturing expertise and missiles comes together with Egyptian political, military and economic influence, and the Turkish arm and the Gulf influence are added to them, an image is formed that does not comfort opponents. The image says that weapons are produced here and are not shipped under conditions of maneuvers managed according to joint plans.
(0:07:46) No media shot. Short decision chains reduce response time and close the window of surprise. But why are others upset in Tel Aviv? Counter-terrorism capabilities and special operations are developing, and the Mediterranean and Red Sea theaters are being watched with a more patient eye.
(0:08:05) Any mistake you make on the borders or in the air becomes more costly, and in Washington, the calculations of influence are changing. Cairo’s rapprochement with a non-Arab nuclear partner and close relations with East Asia all reduce the ability to be pressured with the weapon of aid and licenses. We are not facing an axis of echo, but rather an engineering of independence. Every step reduces dependence, every maneuver shortens the decision-making chain, and every new production line plucks the feathers of an old blackmail.
(0:08:34) But how is success measured? Success is not measured by the number of statements, but by the number of doors closed to surprises. Having a common image in the most difficult times. Establishing a single language of communication in the field. Building local manufacturing capabilities that guarantee ammunition, parts, and development without waiting for realistic training that raises the level of trust between crews. When units move together as one team, readiness becomes a policy before it is a weapon.
(0:09:04) The bottom line: From slogan to capability: The Egyptian-Pakistani alliance is not a leap in the air, but rather a series of cold decisions: manufacturing, training, transferring expertise, and expanding the arenas of cooperation. With the expansion of the Islamic arc, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and a technical backer in the Middle East, the scene shifts from a question of who arms whom to a more precise question: who owns his decision when others are late?
(0:09:31) At the moments when geography tests the nerves of politics, power is not measured by the height of the statements, but by the short minutes between the detection of the target and the issuance of the decision. Here precisely, the value of the Egyptian-Pakistani alliance changes from hot news to reality, operating a system that closes gaps instead of filling the screens and transforming dependence on the outside from fate to a viable option. But what has actually changed? Three clear pillars constitute...
(0:10:00) First, joint manufacturing that installs ammunition, parts, and systems within a supply chain closer to the national decision, so that the field does not stop at the first red light coming from abroad. Second, operation and training in a unified language and agreed-upon procedures, so that maneuvers are transformed from a seasonal display into a short decision chain measured in seconds, not pages.
(0:10:27) Thirdly, peaceful nuclear expertise creates knowledge sovereignty in managing reactors and preparing cadres, thus fortifying the energy economy and reducing the noise of technical blackmail in the long term. Three pillars, three gaps that close ammunition, time, knowledge.
(0:10:45) On the map of the region, this line does not move alone. There is an expanding Islamic arc, and finally, the message is calm and clear for a free test from today onwards, from the factory to the field, from the command room to the radar screen. A deterrent equation is formed that gives politics a solid backing and keeps the cost of the adventure higher than any possible gain. Our question now is:
(0:11:09) Are we actually approaching the establishment of an Islamic NATO force with realistic features, manufacturing, training, and decisions, or is history repeating itself, as this time the file is not read in newspapers, but in military factories?
 
The SC said:
Here is the full transcript..
You can open the video in YouTube and fallow the transcript..

(0:00:00) A military agreement between Egypt and Pakistan terrifies Israel. When the winds of war blow and the decisions of politicians cloud, countries do not wait for the sympathy of major capitals. Whoever has a safety net creates it, and here the story begins. Egypt and Pakistan are a new line of contact between the two Easts, and an alliance written this time in the language of factories and maneuvers, not in the language of courtesy.
(0:00:28) The region is on the brink of ignition, and no one possesses the luxury of neutrality. Cairo is moving towards partnerships that add weight, not noise. Manufacturing capabilities, transfer of expertise, and maneuvers speak for themselves. In contrast, Islamabad possesses what many lack: a self-sufficient weapons school and an armament program that aims to be independent of the whims of suppliers. And with every practical step, the definition of power changes.
(0:00:55) Production lines that ensure local ammunition and parts. Technology transfer contracts that create skills. No labels on the box and local maintenance that keeps systems in service when supply doors close. The maneuvers here are not press photos, but standardized communication protocols and clear engagement procedures.
(0:01:16) And a short decision chain measured in seconds from monitoring to implementation on the other side, Islamabad offers a complete package of fighters, tanks, cruise missiles, and drones built with the philosophy of sufficiency and lessons of war economy that reduce operating costs and eliminate the extortion of the spare parts sector.
(0:01:38) A new era of military power and joint manufacturing. An alliance that closes the gaps in ammunition, time, and knowledge at the same time. Whispers of peaceful nuclear cooperation that translate into training cadres, managing reactors, and industrial safety that raises the level of sovereignty. In the background, the features of a broad Islamic military alliance.
(0:01:59) Egyptian political and military weight, Pakistani industrial capacity, Gulf economic depth, and a Turkish operational arm, eastern levers that open the door to realism and reduce the cost of dependency. The result is not noise, but rather a cold balance of power that reduces the scope of surprise and raises the cost of error for its opponents.
(0:02:21) Whoever bets on emptiness will find a stage busy with procedures, and whoever tests readiness will discover that testing is no longer without a price. Here, policy is written with working tools, not with unforgettable slogans. From closed rooms to the work schedule, successive meetings in Cairo: ministers, chiefs of staff, and officials responsible for military production at one table. The file is open on three tracks.
(0:02:48) Joint manufacturing of weapons and ammunition, a logistical support system, with explicit calls for Pakistani companies to participate in upcoming Egyptian exhibitions and programs, localization of technology, not a passing deal, operation and training, expanding maneuvers, unifying communication protocols, and raising the ability to work together from a slogan to procedures.
(0:03:10) Peaceful nuclear energy, expertise in operating small and medium reactors, and cadre preparation programs are a technical lever that reduces dependence on foreign countries in the long term. In parallel, a broader arc is forming on the other side: defense agreements in the Gulf, Turkish influence in the East, and technical support from major Asian partners. All of these are threads that feed the same direction: independence of military decisions in the Arab and Islamic worlds.
(0:03:38) But what's on the table in terms of name and weaponry? The Al-Khaled tank: improved armor, advanced fire systems, and manufacturing expertise that allows for local development. The GF-17 fighter: the latest generation. Low operating costs. Flexible radars and weapons capabilities. A smart approach to expanding the fighter fleet without a stifling cost.
(0:04:03) A respectable operational range and the ability to handle conventional warheads and paper that raises the cost of aggression and increases the complexity of the opponent’s calculations. Combat and reconnaissance drones like Burak, an eye that never sleeps over borders and sea lines. Light and medium weapons are proven, documented alternatives and less expensive than Western systems. The point of all this is that a weapon is purchased for today’s mission.
(0:04:30) And a manufacturing chain is built for a tomorrow that does not wait for shipments. Nuclear weapons are the difficult language of peace. Pakistan has extensive nuclear experience and Egypt operates a peaceful nuclear project to secure energy. The meeting here is technically excellent. Training of reactor management cadres and a nuclear safety culture is built from the control room to a page in the operating manual. What is required is not a slogan but rather acquired skills.
(0:04:58) Safe operation, preventive maintenance, fault simulation, fuel consumption management, and logistics chains that do not break down at the first crisis. When this knowledge is transferred from books to minds, cognitive independence is created, reducing the need for any external crutch and fortifying the system against extortion of spare parts or emergency expert services.
(0:05:21) On the ground, this means creating joint qualification programs for engineers and operators, emergency simulation tests, and standardized procedures for safety, firefighting, and radiation briefing. It also means strengthening national oversight bodies and aligning protocols with international best practices so that facilities are managed with transparency and discipline, and traceability of flour materials closes the door to any ambiguity.
(0:05:47) Nuclear power here is civilian, providing stable electricity, supporting heavy industry, and providing strategic options such as desalination of seawater and reducing fluctuations in the fuel bill. As for the military, Cairo’s international obligations are clear and non-negotiable.
(0:06:05) But the transfer of peaceful expertise alone is sufficient to create energy sovereignty, raise the level of economic immunity, and give the general decision a solid backing. When the energy basket is diversified and its cost stabilizes, industrial planning becomes more sustainable and foreign policy becomes less sensitive to price extortion. In the end, what is being built here is not just a reactor.
(0:06:28) Rather, an army of engineers, operators, supervisors, and a language of precise procedures that make safety a daily culture, not a poster on the walls. That is the true value, the ability to work on the worst day and give the state the luxury of saying no when presented with unacceptable conditions.
(0:06:47) An indelible history and an unpostponable present. This is not the first thread between Cairo and Islam. After the October War, Pakistan said that Egypt’s battle is our battle and provided men and equipment. Later, the Guardians of the Sky and Thunder maneuvers came to bring the language of joint operations back to life.
(0:07:07) Air defense tactics, special operations, and experiments on silent platforms worried the enemy because they think outside the box. History here is not decoration. It is an investment in experience, not a banner raised for an expanding alliance and an equation being reformulated.
(0:07:25) When a Pakistani force armed with manufacturing expertise and missiles comes together with Egyptian political, military and economic influence, and the Turkish arm and the Gulf influence are added to them, an image is formed that does not comfort opponents. The image says that weapons are produced here and are not shipped under conditions of maneuvers managed according to joint plans.
(0:07:46) No media shot. Short decision chains reduce response time and close the window of surprise. But why are others upset in Tel Aviv? Counter-terrorism capabilities and special operations are developing, and the Mediterranean and Red Sea theaters are being watched with a more patient eye.
(0:08:05) Any mistake you make on the borders or in the air becomes more costly, and in Washington, the calculations of influence are changing. Cairo’s rapprochement with a non-Arab nuclear partner and close relations with East Asia all reduce the ability to be pressured with the weapon of aid and licenses. We are not facing an axis of echo, but rather an engineering of independence. Every step reduces dependence, every maneuver shortens the decision-making chain, and every new production line plucks the feathers of an old blackmail.
(0:08:34) But how is success measured? Success is not measured by the number of statements, but by the number of doors closed to surprises. Having a common image in the most difficult times. Establishing a single language of communication in the field. Building local manufacturing capabilities that guarantee ammunition, parts, and development without waiting for realistic training that raises the level of trust between crews. When units move together as one team, readiness becomes a policy before it is a weapon.
(0:09:04) The bottom line: From slogan to capability: The Egyptian-Pakistani alliance is not a leap in the air, but rather a series of cold decisions: manufacturing, training, transferring expertise, and expanding the arenas of cooperation. With the expansion of the Islamic arc, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and a technical backer in the Middle East, the scene shifts from a question of who arms whom to a more precise question: who owns his decision when others are late?
(0:09:31) At the moments when geography tests the nerves of politics, power is not measured by the height of the statements, but by the short minutes between the detection of the target and the issuance of the decision. Here precisely, the value of the Egyptian-Pakistani alliance changes from hot news to reality, operating a system that closes gaps instead of filling the screens and transforming dependence on the outside from fate to a viable option. But what has actually changed? Three clear pillars constitute...
(0:10:00) First, joint manufacturing that installs ammunition, parts, and systems within a supply chain closer to the national decision, so that the field does not stop at the first red light coming from abroad. Second, operation and training in a unified language and agreed-upon procedures, so that maneuvers are transformed from a seasonal display into a short decision chain measured in seconds, not pages.
(0:10:27) Thirdly, peaceful nuclear expertise creates knowledge sovereignty in managing reactors and preparing cadres, thus fortifying the energy economy and reducing the noise of technical blackmail in the long term. Three pillars, three gaps that close ammunition, time, knowledge.
(0:10:45) On the map of the region, this line does not move alone. There is an expanding Islamic arc, and finally, the message is calm and clear for a free test from today onwards, from the factory to the field, from the command room to the radar screen. A deterrent equation is formed that gives politics a solid backing and keeps the cost of the adventure higher than any possible gain. Our question now is:
(0:11:09) Are we actually approaching the establishment of an Islamic NATO force with realistic features, manufacturing, training, and decisions, or is history repeating itself, as this time the file is not read in newspapers, but in military factories?
Click to expand...
Thanks a lot for your effort brother
 
everyone is too far

Egypt is the strongest and closest to Israel

Mubarak was a bastard but he would never allow Israel to do the Genocide

because he knew he had fought Israel once and he was ready to do it again

he actually kept Israel in check

if Egyptians activated all military with element of surprise they could take Gaza and secure the Palestinians

and for the next 1,000 years they would go down in the history books with valour and honour

the history would be very kind to them

but its never going to happen with Sisi in power
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 25 (members: 0, guests: 25)

Pakistan Defence Latest

Country Watch Latest

Latest Posts

Share this page

Back
Top