Signalian
Think Tank
- Aug 18, 2015
- 11,456
- 25,917
PA doesn't show interest in Light Tanks.That is very much possible.
Prior to 2015, Chinese tanks have suffered from relatively weak suspension, specifically low Torsion Bar strength and life, yet following setbacks and revelations during both internal exercises and external use in Tank Biathlon and PA tank bid against BM Oplot, it is said that both indigenous ZTZ99A, as well as VT-4s, enjoys reinforced suspension that's up to the leading international standard, enabling redundancies for side protection modules.
VT-5 have showcased the ability to mount modular side protection in their state television, with the primary advertised scheme being FY-2SH ERA (FY-4 also possible), offering defense against Tandem HEAT and resistance against darts in certain frontal angles. Still, as Russian experience have shown, a more comprehensive protection calls for the addition of active protection systems, where both GL-5 and GL-6 are offered.
VT-4 certainly have the potential to become a very effective city fighter thanks to advanced anti-personnel and structure munitions, capable of firing:
BTE-2/3 high explosive with advanced JH-2 explosive formula, with a TNT equivalent of ~5.25kg, more than twice that of NATO 120x570mm multi-purpose high explosive shells;
BTS-8 PELE shells, a dedicated anti-structure shell combining a high explosive body with a tungsten penetrator tip, designed to penetrate concrete/brick walls and explode with enhanced lateral effect
GP-125 ATGM for engaging structures from afar;
BTJ-3 tandem HEAT-FS against reinforced structures and light vehiclesView attachment 1218
Overall VT-4/Al-Haider is a very promising platform, where continuous improvement would certainly transform an already capable vehicle into a platform ready for future conflicts.
Infantry mobility is an important factor in a protected vehicle.
This gate guard concept defies the concept of mobility.