Saturation attack and salvo are themselves a war of attrition, and single or two supersonic cruise missiles cannot play much role in facing escort formations. Faced with dense defense and multiple interceptions, the hit rate sharply decreases. Even if the United States simulates a confrontation with China, it still emphasizes saturation attack. In the US military's vision, once it engages in combat with the Chinese Navy in the Asia Pacific region. So the B-1B supersonic bomber can launch massive AGM-158C stealth anti-ship missiles against the Chinese Navy, together with combat vessels from the US Navy, forming a saturation attack. The US military is fighting against saturation attacks, releasing strong electromagnetic interference. They use target missiles to simulate large-scale attacks and test their defense systems, and China is no exception.I also have a special question to mention. Pakistan has introduced four 054a, and it is unknown whether their regular training will be disclosed. However, when facing Brahmos in India, there is definitely target plane simulation for large-scale salvo, specifically testing the multi-layer air defense system of the 054a,I would never say that in the face of a large number of stealth anti-ship missiles or advanced supersonic anti-ship missiles launching in multiple batches, there is missile system in the world that can intercept 100%. That is just a propaganda myth. What we need to do is to continuously increase the number and upper limit of missiles that can be intercepted in one performance during training.