Chinese SAC - FC-31/J-35 5th Gen Stealth Aircraft

Something different ... is this legit & true?

 
Something different ... is this legit & true?

The Chinese official media did recently publicize this espionage case. The circumstances of the case as publicized are as reported in this article. The culprit was sentenced to death.

However, the last paragraph of the article, which states that “the case involves the FC-31 (J-35)”, is a sheer fabrication. There is no mention in the official circular of the scope of the leaks involved in the case.

The official notice mentions that the culprit was an assistant engineer at a scientific research organization.

China's ground rules:
1. The minimum requirement to enter a research position at a military research institution is a bachelor's degree from a top university; at least a master's degree is usually hired; more than half are doctoral degrees.
A bachelor's degree is promoted to assistant engineer after one year of entry and to engineer after four years;
Master's degrees are promoted to Assistant Engineer after six months of entry and to Engineer after two years;
A doctoral degree is promoted directly to engineer after six months of entry.
The offender is an assistant engineer. This shows that he has worked for a very short period of time. He had very limited access to classified information.
2. In the relevant organizations in China, all personnel involved in classified technology and affairs are first required to assess their personal confidentiality rating. If the employee does not have a confidentiality rating, he will have no access to any classified technology and matters at all. After he has notified the confidentiality level assessment, he will be given a corresponding personal confidentiality level. After that, he can engage in confidential work that is in line with his personal classification. According to my exchanges with the professionals concerned, assistant engineers are not entitled to confidentiality level assessment.

In China's scientific research organizations in the military-industrial field, in addition to the classified technology and classified affairs that have been assessed, there are also classified affairs that have not been assessed.
For example, a certain activity was carried out at a certain time, certain special materials were purchased externally, etc.
These activities or technologies are generally not classified. However, official agencies usually do not voluntarily release this information either. Foreign spy agencies are also very interested in this information. This matter is the focus of leaks.

An assistant engineer leaking core secrets? Very, very, very difficult!
 
Last edited:
Something different ... is this legit & true?

2025-03-19 11:35
刘某与境外间谍情报机关的联络情况被国家安全机关侦查发现并详细掌握,国家安全机关依法对刘某实施抓捕。通过对刘某审查,其对自己所犯罪行供认不讳。最终,刘某因犯间谍罪、非法提供国家秘密罪被依法判处死刑,剥夺政治权利终身。
 
Something different ... is this legit & true?

fake, the official article never mentioned J-35 and yet this news claimed it derived from official news.
 
How do you know? Just guessing?

F-35 is stealth strike fighters, while J-35 is stealth multirole combat aircraft.

Please use data and solid proof to back your bold statement.

View attachment 108989

View attachment 108990
No need to be a aerospace engineer. To be an engineer is enough.

all the F35 versions are externally fat because of the STOVL fan (in the B model) behind the canopy. All the design is impacted by that. This is why it is relatively slow and unable to supercruise despite its huge engine.

The goal was to replace Harrier. After that US decided to try to make it a replacement for F16 fleet because they were short on solution. The commercially succeed. But it is not and will never be a good fighter because studied for air to ground support.

PS : don't explain me it can supercruise. It can't. Only in a light descent so for a limited distance.
 
No need to be a aerospace engineer. To be an engineer is enough.

all the F35 versions are externally fat because of the STOVL fan (in the B model) behind the canopy. All the design is impacted by that. This is why it is relatively slow and unable to supercruise despite its huge engine.

The goal was to replace Harrier. After that US decided to try to make it a replacement for F16 fleet because they were short on solution. The commercially succeed. But it is not and will never be a good fighter because studied for air to ground support.

PS : don't explain me it can supercruise. It can't. Only in a light descent so for a limited distance.
J-35 is a F35 in best, that means without all the penalties coming from a STOVL variant, and dual engine for safety.

I mean, how do you know J-35 is not superior to F-35?
 
I mean, how do you know J-35 is not superior to F-35?
Because the design is not disturbed by the STOVL variant, and because it is a twin engine config : easier to manage a central bay with twin engine config.

I only spoke about aerodynamic performances. I have no information or opinion about the weapon system. I just think US always have the lead in very high electronic systems as AESA radars, counter measures.
 
Because the design is not disturbed by the STOVL variant, and because it is a twin engine config : easier to manage a central bay with twin engine config.

I only spoke about aerodynamic performances. I have no information or opinion about the weapon system. I just think US always have the lead in very high electronic systems as AESA radars, counter measures.
OK. We may never know, which is good for the world peace.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
In fact I'm most surprised why we altogether have more and better images of SAC's J-XDS at hand than from the J-35!

Even more what's the current status - maybe @Michael can help? - of both the naval variant and the landbased version? Is it indeed in LRI-production already ... and when will we finally see it?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Country Watch Latest

Latest Posts

Back
Top