Circadian Rhythm
Banned
- May 5, 2024
- 1,371
- 995
- Country of Origin
- Country of Residence
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Knowing the French, I wouldn't be surprised if they arrested the Tunisian for "Anti-Semitism"!A representative of the illegal, Zionist, and child killing entity going down hard in the Olympics.
Why didn't the special chosen one of g-d use his superiorpowers? Maybe he could have used his crap-magra?Knowing the French, I wouldn't be surprised if they arrested the Tunisian for "Anti-Semitism"!
No, and that may not change much if they do something.Do you believe Israel and by extension US will take a big blow from Iran lying down.
This implies US will win then, because if Iran cant win, that means US can only win, which is actually a faulty conclusion, especially based on US's war record over the past 50-100yrs or so.It's a war Iran can't win
If US does not end up effectively neutralizing Iran's power, then the US will be considered the loser of the war by the world.at best it can attack some US bases in the region in the start of the war
To defang Iran, US needs alot more of everything, which it doesn't have, and will likely collapse if its tries and fails at its attempt(s) to do so.and in response US can defang Iran once and for all, which is what Israel wants.
How? what logistics does US have to perform such a task? these are just dreams in your mind combined with comments US military figures made. US needs to stockpile ammunition, weapons, vehicles, etc for at least 6-12 months before it can be ready to "bomb Iran back 20 years"...why has it taken over 40 years since the Iranian revolution and US still hasn't attacked Iran? Its worst chance of success is today, because Iran has built up its capabilities and US capacity is more stretched and thinned out today.Depends upon what you describe as a lose, yes US boots on Iranian soil is not feasible and not going to happen but bombing Iran back 20 years is something US / Israel can do within weeks.
Wars usually dont go the way the US thinks it will, look at Iraq, Afghanistan, even Ukraine..that should tell you something. Reality will give you a rude awakening soon.If it's a all out war I believe their objective would be regime change.
They would have better chance if they were fired from Syria
It will be one expensive war for the US and with Russian and Chinese supply lines it will be a protracted war. With the Iranian destruction we will see the total destruction of Israel too.No, and that may not change much if they do something.
This implies US will win then, because if Iran cant win, that means US can only win, which is actually a faulty conclusion, especially based on US's war record over the past 50-100yrs or so.
If US does not end up effectively neutralizing Iran's power, then the US will be considered the loser of the war by the world.
To defang Iran, US needs alot more of everything, which it doesn't have, and will likely collapse if its tries and fails at its attempt(s) to do so.
Iranians need to build bigger payloads for their missiles , at least 2000lb.
They aren't interested in the outcome just the money transfers inbetween.How? what logistics does US have to perform such a task? these are just dreams in your mind combined with comments US military figures made. US needs to stockpile ammunition, weapons, vehicles, etc for at least 6-12 months before it can be ready to "bomb Iran back 20 years"...why has it taken over 40 years since the Iranian revolution and US still hasn't attacked Iran? Its worst chance of success is today, because Iran has built up its capabilities and US capacity is more stretched and thinned out today.
Wars usually dont go the way the US thinks it will, look at Iraq, Afghanistan, even Ukraine..that should tell you something. Reality will give you a rude awakening soon.
It is not my mind.. I'm showing you the confusion in the media..the pictures are of the same person...
your first and second post talked about an Iranian killed in Damascus (with a fake name accompanied by photos of Hajizadeh) now this link talks about a strike in Beirut ... please make up your mind wtf you are talking about ...
What will air defense do if it is violated..No this is nothing to do with what we are talking about.
Where does it say there is an obligation to try to shoot it down and if it is not done then the "entity" it is fired at has reason to attack the country whose territory it flew over?
Just keeping digging yourself into an even bigger hole or just stop talking.