Antonius123
Senior Member
- Jan 17, 2010
- 3,922
- 4,610
- Country of Origin
- Country of Residence
That is not a “kind of defensive war”. Keep talking in circles. Your explanation means nothing when you are wrong.
It is only semantic matter.
Scholars and politicians sharply disagree on the ultimate legitimacy of the use of preemptive force. However, most do tend to agree on several fundamental prerequisites for a preemptive strike to be conceived as potentially justifiable.
Preemptive force | International Law, Self-Defense
Preemptive force, military doctrine whereby a state claims the right to launch an offensive on a potential enemy before that enemy has had the chance to carry out an attack. The advantage of a preemptive strike is that, by being the first to act decisively, a state renders the enemy unable to carry
www.britannica.com
The point is: justifiable.
Yes for you.
But you are the one who play ad-hominem abt me here.
You have been oppressing, occupying, stealing land, and killing Palestinians for over 75 years. We have every right to resist this fascist Zionist state. Thanks for admitting Israel is “taking over our territory”. Your Israel “taking over our land ” is such a mild way to put it like it was just handed the land, Israel is stealing land is the correct way to word it.
It is according to you and your own rule, not according to justice nor international law.
UN has issued resolution 181 about partition plan, but you keep rejecting and violating by attacking Israel on and on; once Israel retaliated & violated UN law and took over your territory you shouldn't complain and became whinny.
They are on trial for plausible genocide. That means that Israel’s actions is reasonable and probably of it committing genocide. Your denial means nothing.
Verdict is the determinant.