Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The main different is you need a license to own firearms in Australia, the current law (to which they are most likely going to change) is that you need to apply for a firearms license in Australia with the Police, and that can only be done when you join a club and they send in a form (You can also apply directly to the Police if you are going for a Cat A Gaming license or Cat C/D for vermin control if you are the land owner) That is the major difference.How strict are Australia's laws when it comes to Guns? in comparison to USA ?
Wow the Australia rule sounds very difficult, If i was in Australia that process alone will exhaust me from buying a gun, regardless of whether i want to own one or not, which In my opinion is good, hope USA will implement something that too if what you say about USA gun laws is true, which I trust you on that one.The main different is you need a license to own firearms in Australia, the current law (to which they are most likely going to change) is that you need to apply for a firearms license in Australia with the Police, and that can only be done when you join a club and they send in a form (You can also apply directly to the Police if you are going for a Cat A Gaming license or Cat C/D for vermin control if you are the land owner) That is the major difference.
The application is more or less like what the US does to you if you want to buy a gun, which is to run your background on an NCIC check; that's the same here in Australia. You apply for a gun license, and they will run your name with an AFP check, and if you pass the check, which includes a mental health check, then you are granted a Firearms license. Then you will need permission to buy a firearm from the firearm registry, becuase every legally owned gun are in an AFP database, so basically they have the final say on whether or not you can get a particular firearm.
In oppose to I can go to my local dealer in the US, give them my driver's license and my SSN and I can buy a gun directly from them. And depends on the states, I can bring them home immediately in states like Kansas or Texas, or you need to wait for a cooling-down period before you can go pick up your firearms.
Silly joker, think you are the only one who has a job… this is my evening entertainment.. relaxation from work… etc.. especially seeing Indian’s with egg on their face, always trying to malign Pak…I don't have to Prove my nationality to some key board warrior. Unlike you I have some job and work so can't focus on news
And Yeah just saw video on twitter about j shakar call.. That video is altered and fake as well.
View attachment 165564
Well, it's really not that difficult; it's just some extra steps, and most of them don't require you to do anything. All you need is to go to a gun club, make an application, they will give you a safety course, and then they will apply for the license for you. Then you wait until they tell you to go for an interview.Wow the Australia rule sounds very difficult, If i was in Australia that process alone will exhaust me from buying a gun, regardless of whether i want to own one or not, which In my opinion is good, hope USA will implement something that too if what you say about USA gun laws is true, which I trust you on that one.
I mean last bad/terrible incident attack I hear from that Aus-NZ part of the world was Christ church Mosque Attacks which killed 50 Muslim worshipers, by a Australian man in NZ, after that attack this would be the one in many years, and I guess its because of strict gun laws, you can't predict who will go crazy or lose their mind at what time no matter how many mental health checks are done, people with criminal backgrounds can somehow own guns from I guess underground gangs or something?
Not sure what guns are used in this attack but it looks like a Rifle or Shotgun? But if Australia strict their gun laws even more that's better, its not in govt hands to stop people from getting radicalized or losing their minds but at least controlling the access of guns is sure in their hands.
I mean given the stats you mentioned about the mass shooting in Australia kinda speaks for itself, even some extra steps can undermine lazy people like me from even trying to get one, but i still believe that harder strictions can be applied for the least for civilians to own guns, or maybe like limit number of guns can be owned by one man/household, idk how that will work but definitely not comfortable around people owning guns, I mean not long ago even in Tampa I saw in news that few shots were fired during a road rage incident.Well, it's really not that difficult; it's just some extra steps, and most of them don't require you to do anything. All you need is to go to a gun club, make an application, they will give you a safety course, and then they will apply for the license for you. Then you wait until they tell you to go for an interview.
The last mass shooting here in Australia is the Monash University shooting in 2002, in which a gunman (an international student) killed 2 and wounded 5. Then the one before that is the infamous Port Arthur massacre in 1996, where the last mass shooting in NZ is, as you said, the mosque shooting.
US will NEVER adopt any Australian and New Zealand-style gun law, that's just wishful thinking. We used to have a 10-year ban on Assault rifles during Clinton era, and that faced many drawbacks and they decided not to renew it. Banning guns is most often cited as the reason for a US Civil War 2.0 if that ever happens.
The latest toll is unchanged from yesterday.
16 killed (including the terrorist Sajid Akram)
41 hospitalised (including the terrorist Naveed Akram)
There are 3 different inquiries to be launched by the Law Enforcement Agency,
The shooting death of 15 victims.
The Police response
The background of the 2 terrorists.
They are looking into how the father and son are radicalized. The Law Enforcement currently believes the father was radicalized overseas, and the son locally.
Ot once did you show any sign that raping women and killing children is a war crime. Not once did you condone that behaviour - yet you come on here and make insinuations of antisemitism? Stop being a complete tool.
You cant handle us in saying this attack was horrific - you cant accept a Muslim stepped in to stop more bloodshed.
We detest zionism.
I dont make it personal but you denying all the bad that the IDF committed makes you perhaps one of the lowest forms of human.
Your boys deliberately killed babies incubators and mass grave creators - killed people waiting for food deliveries and shot people in the back whilst praying.
You have no right to talk sh1t on here.
Number 3 is a disgraceful thing that he slipped in, as a generic commentSummary of 60 pages
1) Savior was muslim.
2) Killer was once Afghan scum but now an Indian scum.
3) Jews were killed which is all good.
This thread has all things except the fact that killers were Muslim and civilians have been killed in a terror attack. India sent a "Muslim" strike team to assassinate "Jews" which was no doubt a RAW-MOSAD collaboration.
And I thought Durandhar was pushing the limit of silly.
Let him embarrass himself. He cant even accept a Muslim was the hero. Just cant find it within himself to accept Mr Ahmed was a Syrian…..It is this larger conflation with the zionist occupation and straws they need to clench on to further their project that I feel this thread should not exist independently of their genocide in Gaza. Because, hasbara is already hell bent on scoring points... furthering their occupation, genocide and pushing for a war against Iran simultaneously.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.