HAL LCA Tejas: Updates, News & Discussions

LoL you've been proven wrong. Not 30 years old. Man up and Eat your words.

Sorry, yes, I was wrong, apologies. It was 25 year not 30 year old tech.
Cutting edge stuff to be introducing in 2024....
 
Not even 25 , it's rdy-3.

You know the RDY-3 is basically a tweaked RDY-2 with improved SAR, basically the same radar. You do know that right?

The fact you are arguing about how good a 25 year old non AESA radar with 50km detection range is sums up everything.

The Mirage 2000 upgrade for India came 10-15 years too late. In an AESA world and when 100km+ BVR missiles are slowly becoming the norm this is a waste of resource.

UAE, Qatar and others are now retiring these planes, India is in the middle of introducing them
 
You know the RDY-3 is basically a tweaked RDY-2 with improved SAR
"Tweaked" is your choice if words to underplay the upgrade.
Why don't Pakistanis build some aero radar. Let's see how "tweaking" goes.

The fact you are arguing about how good a 25 year old non AESA radar with 50km detection range is sums up everything.

Rdy-2 alone has 120km- 5m2 RCS capability. Go read more type less schoolboy .

The Mirage 2000 upgrade for India came 10-15 years too late. In an AESA world and when 100km+ BVR missiles are slowly becoming the norm this is a waste of resource.
When did Pakistan got its first AESA equipped fighter jet ?? 🤣
 
You guys are basically arguing with a man who is set in his opinion. An opinion based on bias. Anything you say, he will argue against it because hes not here to learn or be corrected, just to troll and harp his uneducated irrelevant opinions. This whole argument only proves the age old saying - You can drag a horse to the well, but you cant make it drink the water.

Igonre him and move on.

Edit: while trying to convince him (i dont know why you have to convince him) that he is wrong you are now going off topic and discussing things that arent Tejas related. Congrats, you let a troll ruin another thread.
 
;)

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
You guys are basically arguing with a man who is set in his opinion. An opinion based on bias. Anything you say, he will argue against it because hes not here to learn or be corrected, just to troll and harp his uneducated irrelevant opinions. This whole argument only proves the age old saying - You can drag a horse to the well, but you cant make it drink the water.

Igonre him and move on.

Edit: while trying to convince him (i dont know why you have to convince him) that he is wrong you are now going off topic and discussing things that arent Tejas related. Congrats, you let a troll ruin another thread.

Cry harder
 
"Tweaked" is your choice if words to underplay the upgrade.
Why don't Pakistanis build some aero radar. Let's see how "tweaking" goes.



Rdy-2 alone has 120km- 5m2 RCS capability. Go read more type less schoolboy .


When did Pakistan got its first AESA equipped fighter jet ?? 🤣

Source for RDY-2 range or your making stuff up again?
 
UAE, Qatar and others are now retiring these planes, India is in the middle of introducing them
French Air and Space Force will use it till 2036...

@GatlingGun
 
IAF is a professional force and can very well decide what is best for it.
F-16 was introduced many decades back, but is still relevant, due to constant upgrades. It reminds one of the most potent and widely employed fighter across the world.
Why can’t M2000 or any other aircraft upgraded and kept relevant?
Trolls can’t see it for obvious reasons.

MK IA, has some of the best systems and capabilities and can give a run for its money to any other fighter in this region.
 
IAF is a professional force and can very well decide what is best for it.
F-16 was introduced many decades back, but is still relevant, due to constant upgrades. It reminds one of the most potent and widely employed fighter across the world.
Why can’t M2000 or any other aircraft upgraded and kept relevant?
Trolls can’t see it for obvious reasons.

MK IA, has some of the best systems and capabilities and can give a run for its money to any other fighter in this region.

No one is denying IAF is a professional source, but think we can all agree some purchases have been dubious or come far too late, its just tragic that many posters here will defend anything the IAF does due to nationalistic pride, to the point they make up stats and run away when asked for sources. If you are scared of a debate just keep quiet would be my advice.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest Posts

Back
Top