I feel ashamed over the treatment of Afghan refugees: Imran Khan

[313Ghazi]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

Time and again, Imran Khan has voiced his opposition to repatriation of Afghan refugees.

Well he can setup a charity to support Afghans repatriated to Afghanistan - but the rest of us have had enough of them.

 

[PakFactor]

Aura farming from prison. But has no solutions to this problem other than making Pakistan especially Balochistan and KP, afghan colonies.

Meanwhile the "treatment" that is so horrible, is that we deport one import two.

After seeing what happened in Iran, I do not want them in our country, as there is no way to verify these Afghans from a lawless country across the border.

 

[Goenitz]

Kick them out. Expel ALL the afghans out of Pakistan. To hell with the KUFFAR emirates of afghanistan. We have been appeasing and bending over backwards for these afghans for over 46 years and all we got was the murder of 70,000+ Pakistanis and terrorism in our country. We need to kick these foreign invaders out of Pakistan once and for all. We need a FINAL SOULTION to the afghan problem.

Who started it? Why did we allow drone attacks? Did Pashtuns or Afghans kill us before 9/11? How many time we rejected deals with Balochis? 48, 58 and then in 70s. Who killed Sardar Naoroz Khan after the deal?

So do you think we lost 70k Pakistanis becasue Afghans were here or our policies?

Just arrest and hand over to the authorities those who are actively involved in insurgency. Recently, both Chinese and Pakistani officials were in Kabul. Do you think IEA would mend relations with us after we humiliate Afghans?

There is a time and place. That thick mind Asim thinks he can do whatever he wants for brownie points.

What did Mushi say.. I will hit them that they won't even know the direction. Now we are getting hit by BLA/BRA etc by all random directions. This is the biggest UNO reverse that facepalmed that arrogant Gaddar (court ruling).

Lastly, kicking them may decrease terrorist activities in cities but increase across border. Anyway, this is the dual-edge swrod in the end.

 

[Goenitz]

After seeing what happened in Iran, I do not want them in our country, as there is no way to verify these Afghans from a lawless country across the border.

Just saying many traitors were Iranian themselves, with a few Afghans. It is just AFG is a soft target, and Tehran doesn't want to portray that local Iranians are unhappy with them to such level.

 

[PAKISTANFOREVER]

Who started it? Why did we allow drone attacks? Did Pashtuns or Afghans kill us before 9/11? How many time we rejected deals with Balochis? 48, 58 and then in 70s. Who killed Sardar Naoroz Khan after the deal?

So do you think we lost 70k Pakistanis becasue Afghans were here or our policies?

Just arrest and hand over to the authorities those who are actively involved in insurgency. Recently, both Chinese and Pakistani officials were in Kabul. Do you think IEA would mend relations with us after we humiliate Afghans?

There is a time and place. That thick mind Asim thinks he can do whatever he wants for brownie points.

What did Mushi say.. I will hit them that they won't even know the direction. Now we are getting hit by BLA/BRA etc by all random directions. This is the biggest UNO reverse that facepalmed that arrogant Gaddar (court ruling).

Lastly, kicking them may decrease terrorist activities in cities but increase across border. Anyway, this is the dual-edge swrod in the end.

The afghans started it when they rejected the creation of Pakistan in 1947 and tried to invade Pakistan in the 1960s in order to capture KPK.

The afghans only understand force and brutality. We don't need them. Kick them ALL out for good. We NEED a final solution to the afghan problem.

 

[hussain0216]

Who started it? Why did we allow drone attacks? Did Pashtuns or Afghans kill us before 9/11?

They did genius?

They have attacked Pakistan since the 1940s, supported terrorists and uprisings, sent people across the border in attacks

Pakistan only really started to respond from the 60s onwards and even then we took millions of the namak haram bastards when THEY THEMSELVES invited th Soviets Into their country


The point is whatever happens, their is no rule or law that they are allowed to stay in Pakistan

Get the fcuk out and go to Afghanistan, why should we look after our enemies

Let them live and die in Afghanistan they have nothing to do with us

 

[Goenitz]

The afghans started it when they rejected the creation of Pakistan in 1947 and tried to invade Pakistan in the 1960s in order to capture KPK.

The afghans only understand force and brutality. We don't need them. Kick them ALL out for good. We NEED a final solution to the afghan problem.

@hussain0216 I know about IPI Faqir and many other insurgencies by Shah and Communist governments etc Those were border conflicts with seldom attacks in cities. Please don't compare a berry with watermelon.

Afghanistan didn't recognise Pakistan bcz of the demarcation. We only successfully solved this issue with China, and perhaps could solve it with the Afghans.

Anyway, the scale is way different now and started when using the British rule book and supported religious hardliners (Alizai and Khost rebellion in 1923/25). Extremists in any form bite back. Be it IEA types or MQM types. That pacifist IK has a point here.

 

[Goenitz]

Thread 'Afghan Refugees op/ed by Ambassador Tariq Osman Hyder'

Aug 15, 2025

Since most of the "Pakistani" media only voices those directly involved in this grand human trafficking industry, it's refreshing to see Ambassador Osman shares the view of a the silent majority in this piece.
_________________________

Afghan refugees.
The Afghan refugees, and other Afghans in Pakistan without passports and visas, are finally being repatriated. For the registered refugees, there is a grace period until the end of August, after which they will be deported. The Afghan refugees started coming in 1979, and now that they are going home, a number of questions arise...

• Asfandyar Bhittani
• Replies: 335
• Forum: Pakistan's Internal Security

• 

 

[PAKISTANFOREVER]

@hussain0216 I know about IPI Faqir and many other insurgencies by Shah and Communist governments etc Those were border conflicts with seldom attacks in cities. Please don't compare a berry with watermelon.

Afghanistan didn't recognise Pakistan bcz of the demarcation. We only successfully solved this issue with China, and perhaps could solve it with the Afghans.

Anyway, the scale is way different now and started when using the British rule book and supported religious hardliners (Alizai and Khost rebellion in 1923/25). Extremists in any form bite back. Be it IEA types or MQM types. That pacifist IK has a point here.

Send them back home where they belong and they can do whatever they want there. Just get the afghans out of OUR country. They are NOT wanted here. Pakistan is OUR land OUR country. It is not the country or home of these foreigners, these afghans.

 

[PAKISTANFOREVER]

sweeping actions are never right. With the latest asylum refugee deportation trend here, what if the UK send back all foreigners?

Anyway, the GHQ brat cannot make a good political/social/diplomatic decision. Let Pak try deporting all Afghans and let's see what would happen.

We don't need to do it all at once. Just little by little. Make life difficult and hostile for afghans in Pakistan. Set the trend. Use the media and other means to demonize the afghan menace in Pakistan. Set the public against them. Put them in camps. There are many things Pakistan can do. Pakistan has a lot of power. We need to come out of the shackles of restraint and start exercising that power against our enemies.

PS You seem to be more loyal to afghan terrorists in Pakistan than to Pakistan itself. You seem to be justifying afghan terrorism and anti-Pakistani activities. Why is that?

 

[Solomon2]

We don't need to do it all at once. Just little by little. Make life difficult and hostile for afghans in Pakistan. Set the trend. Use the media and other means to demonize the afghan menace in Pakistan. Set the public against them -

Sure. Treat Afghans like so many Pakistanis treat Jews and Zionists. What could possibly be wrong about that?

PS You seem to be more loyal to afghan terrorists in Pakistan than to Pakistan itself. You seem to be justifying afghan terrorism and anti-Pakistani activities. Why is that?

Oh, so it's a question of loyalty, now?
Loyalty to who and what, exactly? And why stay loyal to who and what, anyway?

 

[PAKISTANFOREVER]

Sure. Treat Afghans like Pakistanis treat Jews and Zionists. What could possibly be wrong about that?

Oh, so it's a question of loyalty, now?
Loyalty to who and what, exactly? And why stay loyal to who and what, anyway?

You must ALWAYS be loyal to your family, race, ethnicity, nationality and bloodline. ALL else means NOTHING.

 

[Goenitz]

PS You seem to be more loyal to afghan terrorists in Pakistan than to Pakistan itself. You seem to be justifying afghan terrorism and anti-Pakistani activities. Why is that?

Disagreeing with you is not anti-national. I want fewer enemies and our western border to be secure, so we can face east.

You have to understand the bigger game. Central Asia is the underbelly of Russia and the backyard of China. It is the Western interest to destabilise this region so it can check/engage Russia and China at these fronts.

Why do we have to follow the GHQ decision to sweep all Afghans at once to their country and make more enemies? We could take a slow and legal process so they can have a choice to become an economic immigrant by investing in Pakistan or go back.

These deported Afghans in distress and despair can join TTP or ISIS. The West would buy their loyalty so as to play their games. In the end, Pak will lose. We shouldn't lose our goodwill in the long run.

 

[Solomon2]

You must ALWAYS be loyal to your family, race, ethnicity, nationality and bloodline. ALL else means NOTHING.

PF, thank you for your prompt (and doubtless heartfelt) response.

Are you aware that this attitude is precisely why British India administrators despaired of achieving justice in colonial criminal courts? The accused could always find a relative as "witness" to provide an alibi, even under oath.

However, the Brits knew, from their experiences in the nearby Gulf, that Arabs could and did swear binding oaths in court, even if that meant they are their family might suffer as a result.

The colonial administrators concluded that what the "Indians" needed was more religion. Teachers were then imported into the subcontinent from Arabia.

 

[Goenitz]

You must ALWAYS be loyal to your family, race, ethnicity, nationality and bloodline. ALL else means NOTHING.

Truth and rightness. Otherwise, abu lahab was the uncle and utbah was son in law. We always dispute over properties with siblings and side with our spouses who are not blood relatives.