India - Pakistan conflict analysis - aims, tactics, strategy, results

[Nilgiri]

will have to read it all a bit later when I have time

Much appreciated @Panzerkiel , kudos.

 

[Panzerkiel]

Hmmm....seems like no one is interested in a future Pak Ind conflict...especially an indian sea blockade of Pak coastline......anyone>

 

[Ali_Baba]

Hmmm....seems like no one is interested in a future Pak Ind conflict...especially an indian sea blockade of Pak coastline......anyone>

I do think the Indian's have had enough, the Armed forces of Pakistan went overboard on their thrashing of India in Sindoor, and now all they dream of, is nightmares in their sleep.

However, if Pakistan itself decides to escalate or create a new conflict, esp. with what is going on with IWT violations( which I can see happening ), then there maybe something that could happen?

 

[Yasser76]

I do think the Indian's have had enough, the Armed forces of Pakistan went overboard on their thrashing of India in Sindoor, and now all they dream of, is nightmares in their sleep.

However, if Pakistan itself decides to escalate or create a new conflict, esp. with what is going on with IWT violations( which I can see happening ), then there maybe something that could happen?

Agreed, they will be chest thumping for the next 10-15 years I reckon. Conventionally I think, Indians dont see any clear victories here.

 

[Panzerkiel]

A quantitatively superior enemy can only hope to win a long duration war...during which attrition over time and significant stocks of reserves (manpower, equipment and ammo) will be brought to bear....thats why we favor a short war.

 

[omegalamba7xl9]

1. This TRACK 2 DRAMA NEEDS TO STOP .. It's very clear these Indian hate our religion hate our culture hate our country hate our values and have NOTHING BUT ILL WILL .. SO ANYONE FROM ADMINISTRATION DREAMING OR SUGGESTING TRACK 2.. YOU SAW THE TRAILER IN KASHMIR.
2. A SHIFT NEEDS TO HAPPEN..THAT IS HOLA HAAT ON AFGHANISTAN AND TAKING THE CONFLICT INTO INDIA ITSELF. Or else India will keep funding Afghans along with the help of like minded elements against Pakistan while keep PAKISTAN on fking table and shattering it's economy and securing its own. HOW THE FCK INDIA MANAGED TO SHIFT THE PAK ATTENTION TO WEST IS THE RESULT OF PAKISTAN BEING A GOOD BOY BY NOT STRIKING IN INDIA..
3. UNCONVENTIONAL MEANS THEY BE CHANTING Dhurandhar and UNKNOWN men while we are playing goody goody... Stir up Kashmir stir up Punjabi stir up bengal NEED TO HAVE A SERIOUS TALK WITH CHINESE IN NORTH AND US IN BENGAL... THE MORE TIME IS BEING WASTED BY LETTING THEM SLIP BY...
THEY ARE THE REASON SOUTH ASIA CANT PROGRESS THEREFORE DIVISION OF INDIA IS ONLY AND ONLY SOLUTION AND FULFILLMENT OF THE DREAM OF IQBAL...

 

[Yasser76]

A quantitatively superior enemy can only hope to win a long duration war...during which attrition over time and significant stocks of reserves (manpower, equipment and ammo) will be brought to bear....thats why we favor a short war.

This is very true, I would argue that now, even it terms of quantity India has lost the big edge it had. If taking into account comparable aircraft they used to outnumber us 3-1, now it is more like 2-1 or even 1.5-1

That is simply not large enough to win in a long war.

In terms of the ammo and POL situation of Pak Army v Indian Army I am not so sure, but safe to assume if we can win air superiority over India (Big if but May 7th showed us what is possible), ground elements would not matter much

What Iran - US showed us was the need for mass numbers of UAVs, drones and missiles and here, again, I think India's advantge is no longer overwhelming

 

[maxpane]

A quantitatively superior enemy can only hope to win a long duration war...during which attrition over time and significant stocks of reserves (manpower, equipment and ammo) will be brought to bear....thats why we favor a short war.

sir if ennemy succeed to create a scenario of long war then what is the option . i mean just like russia ukrain if i mean if it appens then what we dnt have enough resources then what is the option.

 

[hasssanali8998]

A quantitatively superior enemy can only hope to win a long duration war...during which attrition over time and significant stocks of reserves (manpower, equipment and ammo) will be brought to bear....thats why we favor a short war.

so we should in theory escalate quickly right ??
to turn up the heat and not a slow Attritional war and make them come to the table as fast as possible

but frankly i dont see this happening , i dont see our upper leadership doing it
in both 2019 and 2025 we let them go easy , just " wait for our reposnse " speeches


even quwa talked about how tech isnt our biggest weakness but our decision makers