SoulSpokesman
Trusted Member
@r3alist bro
Your lack of relevancy in military affairs is a big reason why America is downgrading your importance economically,
You have misread the Indo-US relationship, having analysed it from the prism of US-PAK relations. It is primarily an economic relationship, not a military one. From a military point of view, all that US needs from IND is friendly neutrality i.e. that it shouldn't be militarily aligned to PRC or RUS. The reason is simple. IND isn't a worthwhile military power and will be of little use to US.
On the other hand, US PAK relationship is primarily a military one, not an economic one. US needs PAK military support for attaining its geopolitical objectives- the two Afghan wars (1979-90 and 2001-21) being key examples. The reason being PAK military's undisputable strategic nous. Economically of course PAK is no use at all to US, unless the copper and REE turn out to be substantial.
In short horses for courses. IND for economic benefits, PAK for military prowess.
Regards
Your lack of relevancy in military affairs is a big reason why America is downgrading your importance economically,
You have misread the Indo-US relationship, having analysed it from the prism of US-PAK relations. It is primarily an economic relationship, not a military one. From a military point of view, all that US needs from IND is friendly neutrality i.e. that it shouldn't be militarily aligned to PRC or RUS. The reason is simple. IND isn't a worthwhile military power and will be of little use to US.
On the other hand, US PAK relationship is primarily a military one, not an economic one. US needs PAK military support for attaining its geopolitical objectives- the two Afghan wars (1979-90 and 2001-21) being key examples. The reason being PAK military's undisputable strategic nous. Economically of course PAK is no use at all to US, unless the copper and REE turn out to be substantial.
In short horses for courses. IND for economic benefits, PAK for military prowess.
Regards





