EugeneP
Trusted Member
Remember infrastructure is not just pouring concrete on ground. That is fairly easy to do. You should also consider education, healthcare, quality of the polity and all things that make creation of wealth possible.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Here, Hindu forum fighters consider Maratha Rule as reestablishing of Hindu Rule by 1700 to 1818, when they lost to Western forces....In fact, this is incorrect on two counts.
First, there were portions of history when India, hypothetically, according to the reconstruction of World GDP that we are all referring to, was even better off.
Second, after Aurangzeb, the national economy declined, not in a catastrophic manner, but visibly; with the coming to power of the British, with the defeat of the Maratha Confederacy piece-meal, and the reduction of Shivaji's descendants to two minor Maharajas, and the abject surrender of the Nizam, and the Nawab of Oudh, the economy began to decline very rapidly, running from the periodical peak under Aurangzeb to a meagre 2% of the world figure by 1947.
India's progress from 1947 is flawed only by a horribly bad GINI coefficient, but apart from this heart-breaking figure, to be potentially the world's fourth largest economy by 2026 is not a trivial thing.
I visited South Asia last year. I visited Pakistan, Nepal, Bangladesh and India ending with Maldives. Then 6 months later I visited China, far east Russia, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Kazakhstan, Azeribaijan, Iran and Tajikistan.
I noticed one thing India´s infrastructure is beyond poor perhaps worst infrastructure and worse then mountainous Nepal. I was surprised by Bangladesh as having the best infrastructure in South Asia by a landslide most people have no idea how well Bangladesh is build.
Pakistan is second it has great roads and especially Islamabad is beautiful perhaps one of the most beautiful cities I have visited with the way nature and infrastructure is mixed.
But overall as soon as you enter from Indian border Pakistan surprises you it has good infrastructure in comparison. I was kind of surprised by even the tiny details such as the gas stations, motels, restuarants, large clean roads etc etc the Infrastructure is much better and everything was clean and people were extremely chill which adds to the beautiful nature and good infrastructure people arent in your face but they keep distance and just chill overall.
I was just like this guy when I entered Pakistan from India and the place I loved most was Baltistan it has many beautiful district and valley´s with gardens each one better then the other.

I visited South Asia last year. I visited Pakistan, Nepal, Bangladesh and India ending with Maldives. Then 6 months later I visited China, far east Russia, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Kazakhstan, Azeribaijan, Iran and Tajikistan.
I noticed one thing India´s infrastructure is beyond poor perhaps worst infrastructure and worse then mountainous Nepal. I was surprised by Bangladesh as having the best infrastructure in South Asia by a landslide most people have no idea how well Bangladesh is build.
Pakistan is second it has great roads and especially Islamabad is beautiful perhaps one of the most beautiful cities I have visited with the way nature and infrastructure is mixed.
But overall as soon as you enter from Indian border Pakistan surprises you it has good infrastructure in comparison. I was kind of surprised by even the tiny details such as the gas stations, motels, restuarants, large clean roads etc etc the Infrastructure is much better and everything was clean and people were extremely chill which adds to the beautiful nature and good infrastructure people arent in your face but they keep distance and just chill overall.
I was just like this guy when I entered Pakistan from India and the place I loved most was Baltistan it has many beautiful district and valley´s with gardens each one better then the other.
@Afif ,Looks like the Begum gave you the best infrastructure in South Asia by a landslide.
I passed through brussels midi recently and wow its in a bad shape for sure.I'm certainly not bashing it. I'm speaking from reality. I've seen the dumps, the needles, the druggies passed out on the streets. And, this is in the last 6 months.
But is it fair to compare a relatively small part of America with large parts of developing countries.Yes, and Compton when our distribution center was located there. The area surrounding LAX proper is equally bad.
I've been to 3rd world countries that weren't nearly as bad as sections of Los Angeles, San Francisco, Seattle, and , surprisingly, Atlanta.
@UKBengali
UKB Dada,
Do you have any numbers, rankings etc to show that BD is best among the 3 South Asian countries in infra? Or is it just your personal opinion?
Regards
It depends. I've been witnessing the degradation of any number of US cities for quite awhile now and frankly, they are not only getting worse, the proposed solutions will solve no problems.But is it fair to compare a relatively small part of America with large parts of developing countries.
The tenderloin in SF or Skid row in LA are sacrifice zones and the problem seems more politically mismanaged. Reopening mental hospital, spending more on drug and alcohol rehab, and building cheaper starter homes could solve much of the problem. California politicians don’t want to solve the problem.
As far as Indian infrastructure lagging, has to be looked at from a funding and priorities point of view. India is probably spending more to distribute better services across the board then Pakistan or Bangladesh, so spending on sanitation is not as high a priority.
I suspect it’s harder to upkeep things in the US because, a lot of the maintenance budgets are being used to either patch up other problems, then there is more grifters taking a higher cut, and finally not enough tax revenue in the areas that need upkeep.It depends. I've been witnessing the degradation of any number of US cities for quite awhile now and frankly, they are not only getting worse, the proposed solutions will solve no problems.
Concerning your comments about California politicians not wanting to solve problems, I couldn't agree more. If anything, they are creating more problems than solving. Some of the latest "mandates" by the state will only achieve the goal of driving investment out of the state and making it even more unaffordable for those who live there.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.