Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

[ShapurII]

@ShapurII
@Persian Gulf
@Shags101

It's good to think that we have enough missiles to keep the war going, but we have a serious issue that we don't know how to address and that is target selection and real-time data. Sometimes we refuse to hit targets simply because we're not ready for going up the escalation ladder.

As long as the US Navy has imposed a naval blockade on us and the Omani route of the Strait of Hormuz is leaky, it is only a matter of time before we have to sign another useless MoU with the United States.

 

[ShapurII]

Actually, I never believed this logic. So whats the solution then? keep getting own people killed, own leaders killed, own nuclear sites hit ? Imagine if US choose to destroy our nuclear weapon program. We'd let them hit our facilities and won't go after their ships just to assume that they will stop on their own? I think best option would be to make it extremely costly for them and hit the very CSG from that attack has to happen. There's no other good option. Also I think Iran did / or hit whatever it could. If Iran had capability of hitting US warship successfully then it would have done so. There were reports in past where Iranian missiles & drones were launched towards those but intercepted. Trump also said some 100 missiles were launched towards CSG.

If a country has capability to hit enemy warships at will then by all means I think hitting a warship early in the battle creates deterrence. Yes US would become angry and can do massive attack as retaliation but at same time, it would also know that this war can go extremely costly in terms of human loss and assets. No president wants to be reason for bringing more and more body bags home. If country possess unstoppable, long range anti ship missiles and they hit one of warship that also serves as a warning that we will hit your carrier next time if you keep attacking us. So I think Iran did not had that capability. If it had, then what a waste to invest in a capability that you are never going to use out of "fear". What else red line had to be crossed when US actually destroyed nuclear facilities and killed leaders ? All red lines crossed already.

Also, attacking a warship is not attacking american civilians. Even though america is killing Iranian civilians too. Attacking warship is only defending yourself. Because Iran would be practically attacking soldiers who are killing its people and firing missiles towards it. Choosing not to attack enemy's weapon system deliberately that is actively involved in war means surrender. Which we know Iran won't do. So i think Iran did not spared those warships deliberately. I think Iran tried at times but those ships are very capably in terms of air defense.

I think the truth is that the Islamic Republic no longer has strong motivation to hit the Americans like it did in the first three weeks of the Ramadhan War. When the Americans killed Ali Khamenei and they felt that the end was imminent, they fought much more aggressively than when a new Supreme Leader was elected by the Assembly of Experts and Trump said he no longer sought regime change.

 

[Flotilla]

Does anybody remember a ballistic missile volley IRGC style of Russian forces?.

Just two days ago, Zelenski was nagging because Ukraine was not receiving enough PAC3 missiles and just after, Russians launch this large missile volley IRGC style.

I don't recall any missile launch like this in Russians theater.

 

[Immortals]

 

[Immortals]

 

[Eşbah]

Also keep in mind Trump will wait till after midterms then say if Iran tries to close the SoH or charge tolls he will bomb them again. Iran will have little leverage. In 3-4 months, US will produce ~400-500 PAC-3’s and reload their defenses ready for another pathetic skirmish by Iran.

100% right. People need to understand this crucial detail.

Many users tend to overlook this point when they argue that the US will refrain from military action if the Democrats secure victory in the midterm elections.

The reality is that they will just alter the legal justification for the war in Washington, arguing that Iran is now hindering and blocking an international maritime trade route.

While their actions and war objectives will remain unchanged, the legal framework will be modified to justify a new series of attacks. The Democrats will endorse this approach, explaining to their voter base that adherence to international law is essential!

BS excuses to relaunch the war.

 

[Immortals]

 

[Immortals]

 

[BHAN85]

100 chance of israel blowing up any deal this month, bibi trip to washington was not in vain.

 

[Flotilla]

100% right. People need to understand this crucial detail.

Many users tend to overlook this point when they argue that the US will refrain from military action if the Democrats secure victory in the midterm elections.

The reality is that they will just alter the legal justification for the war in Washington, arguing that Iran is now hindering and blocking an international maritime trade route.

While their actions and war objectives will remain unchanged, the legal framework will be modified to justify a new series of attacks. The Democrats will endorse this approach, explaining to their voter base that adherence to international law is essential!

BS excuses to relaunch the war.

One Chinese forum's member said some days ago that any pause in the war would inevitably benefit more Iranian side than US.

So after 4 months, what will change US/Israel side?, more THAADs and PAC3 missiles?.

During this time, Irán can easily re-stock nearly all used missiles in the last year.

On one hand Irán is not exporting their missiles like US does with their THAADs and PAC3. On the other Irán could have eventually even some of the Su35s not to talk new TEL systems like Majid or alternative and duplicated nuclear sites.

 

[Kyussis]

What do you mean by 'we'? What goes in in other Sunni majority countries is their business, nor is it our duty to drag ourselves into their problems. Funny how you also mentioned SAVAK when I can name you countless elements within the IR that oppresses people. And trust me that is not a route you want to take.

By we I mean Iranians. Not Garb Gedda, westoid "Persians" who only want to see Iran's surrender and defeat! When did I say that Iran Should do it for them?

 

[Kyussis]

His ideas are extremely dangerous. Period.

Not wanting to see Iran nuked is a very dangerous? To whom?

 

[tsunset]

PGCC thinks geopolitics is like gambling on an online casino

 

[Kyussis]

The US will absolutely not use nuclear weapons even if Iran develops them. Iran will just have to accept that once they go nuclear, the nuclear bullseye is on them as well.

What will eventually happen is a nuclear arms race in the Middle East.

You are the only country in the world to have used them at a time when Japan was already willing to surrender just to give a message to the Soviets. Why would anyone in their right mind believe that you would not use them again if given the right opportunity ie. Iran dashing to create its own Nuclear weapons? Do you expect me to believe that the U.S especially under this Trump administration is a sane actor?

 

[UberShock]

Important