Kyussis
Trusted Member
Yes for Americans. Not for Iranians.This is literally perfect Hollywood material, a pilot stranded in enemy territory for several days trying to evade combined with a CSAR operation that is stuff of legends.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes for Americans. Not for Iranians.This is literally perfect Hollywood material, a pilot stranded in enemy territory for several days trying to evade combined with a CSAR operation that is stuff of legends.
Come on dude it's a success. Materials are replaceable a fighter pilot/person is not this is a win.If the report turns out to be true of US blowing up two C130s, the operation in material terms cant be really be considered much of a success. Thats several millions of loss in equipment.
But for the US and for Trump specifically, the symbolism and propaganda victory of this operation makes up for those material losses.
To think that four battalions of S-300 PMU2 would be enough for a country the size of Iran is beyond absurd. And they insisted that we didn't need to purchase AD all the time. How many Bavar-373s were spotted in operation? We were defenseless all this time.those people were idiots.
But interceptors arriving wouldn’t have changed the battle because the establishment decided that a small S-300 order and whatever Iranian defense industry could produce would be enough against the greatest airforce in the world.
I routinely said to purchase S-400 on top of S-300 and also buy anything else we can get our hands on to create the densest air defense we can.
Did you know Syria in 2011 had a more dense air defense network than Iran in 2025?
Hard to believe, but Assad had one of the densest air defense networks for an Arab country. He lost it over time due to civil war and defections and Israeli strikes after his forces had to retreat.
They established complete air superiority over Iran in a few hours with about 200-250 jet fighters (including IAF), most of which are not even F-35s.Iran does need an air force, true, but whatever Iran had managed would've been decimated within couple of days.
So if Iran had diverted missiles money towards airforce, today Iran would neither have the airforce and nor have the missiles.
It's a lot more embarrassing for Americans.Yes for Americans. Not for Iranians.
The odds were not against the WSO since Iran had no helicopter with IR that could take off due to US controlling the airspace.

This is a victory for the Americans.It's a lot more embarrassing for Americans.
1 F15
1 A10
1 Blackhawk
2 C130s
Iranians clearly didn't care to capture a pilot in that uninhabited area of Iran near the Gulf waters. And probably didn't know in the beginning it was a successful shoot down.
Trump admin is trying to spin this a victory
Actually according to some reports they even destroyed another A10 in the process
If the report turns out to be true of US blowing up two C130s, the operation in material terms cant be really be considered much of a success. Thats several millions of loss in equipment.
But for the US and for Trump specifically, the symbolism and propaganda victory of this operation makes up for those material losses.
I am mad that not even a single American was killed after a day of flying deep inside our territory.People getting mad that Iran didn’t find the operator in this region
how do you know they haven't lost a single soldier? the downed helicopter ? they all survived ?This is a victory for the Americans.
They rescued two pilots deep inside Iranian territory without a single solder killed in action. Let that sink in.
The odds were not against the WSO since Iran had no helicopter with IR that could take off due to US controlling the airspace.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.