Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

View attachment 190376


WTF is wrong with this guy ?

Who talks like this while being the president of a country ?

Does US Democracy not allow for mental checks on the guy who is supposed to make serious decisions ?

Note : This is actual TruthSocial screenshot I took directly .. its not fake, if anyone's wondering.
paranoid, seems to be a huge difference of opinion between the Pentagon and Trump administration.
 
بحرینی اخبار میں چھپنے والا پاکستان مخالف کارٹون
سن 2015 میں جب سعودیہ یمن جنگ چل رہی تھی تو سعودی عرب نے پاکستان کو جنگ میں ساتھ دینے کا کہا۔
اس وقت کی پارلیمنٹ نے اس درخواست کو مسترد کر دیا اور کہا کہ اس جنگ میں پاکستان کسی کا ساتھ نہیں دے گا بلکہ غیر جانبدار رہے گا۔۔
اس وقت سعودی عرب نے شدید رد عمل دیا اور ایک سعودی شہزادے نے تو پاکستان کو شدید نتائج کی دھمکی دے ڈالی۔
خیر اس کا ذکر پھر کبھی سہی
اس کارٹون میں بحرینی آرٹسٹ عبداللہ المحرقی نے سعودی بادشاہ سلمان بن عبد العزیز کو دکھایا جو ایک ہاتھ میں بندوق اور ایک ہاتھ میں پیسے تھامے ایک پاکستانی کے پاس آتا ہے اور اسے کہتا ہے جا کے لڑو لیکن پاکستانی کہتا ہے کہ نہیں میں نہیں لڑوں گا۔
پھر سعودی بادشاہ کہتا ہے کہ "یہ لو" یعنی پیسے لو اور لڑو جس پر پاکستان کہتا ہے کے "ھے واللہ"؟
یعنی واقعی۔
بحرینی آرٹسٹ نے پاکستان کا مذاق اڑانے کی کوشش کی تھی کہ یہ ابھی انکار کر رہے ہیں لیکن بعد میں پیسے لے کر لڑیں گے۔
لیکن پاکستان واقعی اس جنگ میں غیر جانبدار رہا تھا۔
اور آج بحرین کی اپنی حالت یہ ہوئی پڑی ہے کہ اربوں ڈالر ہونے کے باوجود بھی اپنا دفاع نہیں کر سکتے۔
بدو اوقات سے باہر ہو گئے تھے
لیکن اب ہوش ٹھکانے آ رہے ہیں ان کے۔۔
1775392386351.png
 
paranoid, seems to be a huge difference of opinion between the Pentagon and Trump administration.
Pentagon needs to grow a spine and coup this guy you swesr loyalty to us constitution! Now protect it
 
It is expecting that there should NOT loss any expensive aircrafts (big ones), yet we see many pictures release recently.

Don't focus on 1 PILOT only, see full pictures
It was sand storm in 1980, It is self destruction in 2026 haha US and its coping.
 
Even per international law, Iran has every right to fully exercise control of its territorial waters up to 12 nautical miles (22 km), which is basically more than half of the Strait of Hormuz at its narrowest point.

No, this is not correct.

Even though Iran’s territorial waters cover a large part of the Strait of Hormuz, international law specifically prevents it from exercising full control over navigation in that strait.

Same applies for all international straits. From Suez to Bosporus to Malakka - the transit of passage can't be obstructed by nearby coastal countries.

Another fun fact: oil tankers and heavy containers eventually have to pass through Iran's territorial waters, due to the shallow depth of the other side of the strait at some points.

Another fun fact: Iran has not ratified UNCLOS. Hence, we are not obliged to even abide by this and can declare a longer distance for our territorial waters. The US isn't a party to UNCLOS either.

Türkiye hasn't signed it either, yet, customary international law does exist and it is binding.

There is no reason to halt civil maritime traffic while the IRGC continues to damage the energy infrastructure of the GCC. Given that Israel has chosen to attack Iran's essential infrastructure to create a failed state anyways, Tehran has no longer any motivation to officially close the strait and be the official boogeyman in this conflict.

Generating a global energy price shock is Iran's main objective. Why accept the international blame without anything in return if you must strike Arab oil facilities anyway due to the assault on your critical infrastructure by Israel and the US?
 


As I predicted earlier and as is now the case with US reporting. initial reports down played how bad this was for US. Now 2 C-130s, 4 helis and 2 Reapers. Why did they need to blow up 4 Little Birds? Possibly lack of fuel to make it back, as maybe one of the C-130s was a refueller, but the "stuck in mud" theory is becoming less and less believable

1 saved airman.

Both sides can comfortably claim success, although I am betting more bad news will slowly come out from the US side. I think the airmen has passed away.
 
Misleading train of thoughts. Opening the SoH and destroying the energy infrastructure of GCC is the current approach of IRGC - and it does make sense.

Freedom of navigation (FoN) is the only logical and credible argument the US has against Iran on a global stage right now.

It is not a coincidence that Iran is gradually opening the strait while destroying more and more production and storage facilities on the other side of the shore.

If production of the GCC is destroyed or curtailed

Then the Hormuz being open or closed doesn't do diddly squat, it's all the same

The GCC needs to be taught a lesson, their support for the petro dollar, support for U S bases and presence and inability to use that to curtail U.S support for the Zionists has caused chaos in the region

And by the end of this conflict, the GCC needs to remove all U.S bases, radars and support systems or face continued attack
 
It is expecting that there should NOT loss any expensive aircrafts (big ones), yet we see many pictures release recently.

Don't focus on 1 PILOT only, see full pictures
Sir, respectfully, the correct context in which to frame the outcome is that determined by the stated objectives of the protagonists.

USA, since as far back as I can remember, states clearly that nobody will be left behind in their wars, regardless of material cost.

USA is 100% successful in this context.

I agree that he may be severely injured, but they got him out and stuck to their promise.

The material cost was substantial, but it won't alter the tactics of the USA in future scenarios because mostly small arms hits and a boggy runway are factored into their calculus already. They avoided the threshold of loss that would cause alteration in their future approach. I.e. they will violate Iranian territory at will and on their terms in a similar scenario next time.

Iran's main stated aim was to capture the pilot, which failed.

Secondarily, (and I think this should have been their MAIN aim, and perhaps it even secretly was despite their statements), they sought to inflict casualties upon rescue assets (both human and material). Here, they partially succeeded, but not enough (see above paragraph).
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Country Watch Latest

Back
Top