Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


For sure, the Pakistani state is involved in intensely diplomacy to build the ground work for Islamabad Talks 2. Vali Nasr said yesterday something like 'Pakistan is not only the best game but the only game' in this conflict.
 
@Watandar @HAIDER

One must accept reality and truth even its not what you wanted to hear or even if its against your emotions. "Disliking" or liking shouldn't be done based on personal biases but should be bases on reality.

Read my post again which was in response to a post that declared "Iran" as leader of muslim world lol. I challenge you to pick any point and prove it wrong. Okay leave Syria as we can have differences in our point of views. But there's a lot more in my rest of the post and that is 100% agreeable for anybody who knows basics of geopolitics. Do you guys really think Iran fought this war not for itself but for "muslim world". You guys believe in such simplistic theory? You guys believe if any muslim country is attacked then Iran would come to help ?? Why Iran didn't fired missiles at Israel when Israel was comitting genocide at Gaza ?? How a country can be a leader when no other muslim country accepts it as so or wants to follow it ? Let's be realistic with ourselves. I can write tons of arguements that this war is Iran's own national war. It was not for Gaza and it certainly was not for muslim world. Be realistic please.
When Iran claimed he is leader of Muslim world ?. Majority of Muslim world enemy of Iran provide bases to US and Israel. Start reading the history when Iran-Iraq war started.
1776259394614.png


1776259613375.png

 
Last edited:
He added Iran is “most likely” to host a delegation from Pakistan today in a continuation of talks previously held in Islamabad that will include “detailed talks on the positions” of Iran and the US.
4230E12F-CA67-45EA-88D8-DFB309681D04.jpeg
Idk if this is arya’s real back up account though
 
When Iran claimed he is leader of Muslim world. Majority of Muslim world enemy of Iran provide bases to US and Israel. Start reading the history when Iran-Iraq war started.
View attachment 192441


View attachment 192442

Arabs and Iranians should unite, hold each other's hands, and work together against Israel. If they continue to fight within themselves, they will all become losers.
 
What exactly are the mullahs afraid of? There is nothing worse than a full scale bombing and a naval blockade, except for a nuclear attack. Not possessing nuclear weapons is a foolish act that invites that worst-case scenario upon themselves. If war is inevitable, and if a naval blockade is inevitable, then Iran should possess nuclear weapons; that is the only way for the nation to survive.
 
View attachment 192443
Idk if this is arya’s real back up account though

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
One of latest videos of the Pakistani journalist Hamid Mir. Per this one, the Pakistani journalistic community knew on April 1 of the upcoming Islamabad Talks on April 11 but decided to be mum about that. Per this video, there are already several technical experts versed in international laws/treaties present in Islamabad to work on a UNSC backed resolution to end this conflict. Hamid is also saying that Trump himself may go to Islamabad as long as the Iranian President Pezeskian is also there to sign the historic agreement. Mir is also saying that Netanyahu was getting the updates while the meeting in Islamabad was going on. There is also a mention of the Chinese angle in this, which is significant.

Well worth watching if you have 13 minutes. English captions available.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Lol, Extremely simplistic & innocent thought which is extremely far from reality.

Nobody is leader in muslim world. A leader is one who everyone follows and everyone accept it as a leader.

Like every country, Iran look after only its own interests. It funds Houthis and Hezbullah only for its own geopolitical gains. Iran helped ruined & completely destroy Syria by giving a new lifeline to a dictator Bashar al Asad who was very close to be thrown out in arab spring. Syria would have survived that long suffering. Syrians will never forget what Iran did with them for its own geopolitical gains. Iran would use any muslim country as a tissue paper for its purpose. Its nothing against Iran but that's how the world is. KSA & Turkey have their own geopolitical objectives. Iran simply can never imagine to be their "leader' as these countries have opposite objectives, a sea of differences, none of these or any other country would ever follow such a controversial "leader".

Iran fought a great war, but don't mistake it as anything done for "muslim world" or even Gaza. Iran didn't fired a single missile when day in and day out IDF was dropping 2000 lbs bombs over residential complexes, hospitals, refugee camps and turning entire gaza into rubble. When Israel had completely turned Gaza into piece of rubble it turned its attention towards Iran and planned to eliminate a future threat (Iran's nuclear program). Only when Iran itself was attacked only then Iran retaliated. Iran won't care if any other muslim country is attacked. If Turkey, Azerbaijan, KSA, Pakistan, Egpyt, Libya, Sudan, Indonesia, any muslim country is attacked Iran would literally say who gives a f-k. So please remember they only fought for their own country. They didn't fought for "muslims" or Gazans or anyone else.
The Jewish Harvard professor, Samuel Huntington in his 1990s book "Clash of Civilizations, Remaking of the New World Order" wrote:

An Islamic core state has to possess the economic resources, military
power, organizational competence, and Islamic identity and
commitment to provide both political and religious leadership to the
ummah. Six states are from time to time mentioned as possible leaders
of Islam
; at present, no one of them, however, has all the requisites to
be an effective core state.

Indonesia is the largest Muslim country and
is growing rapidly economically. It is, however, located on the
periphery of Islam far removed from its Arab center; its Islam is of the
relaxed, Southeast Asian variety; and its people and culture are a
mixture of indigenous, Muslim, Hindu, Chinese, and Christian
influences.

Egypt is an Arab country, with a large population, a central,
strategically important geographical location in the Middle East, and
the leading institution of Islamic learning, Al-Azhar University. It is
also, however, a poor country, economically p. 178 dependent on the
United States, Western-controlled international institutions, and oilrich
Arab states.

Iran, Pakistan, and Saudi Arabia have all explicitly defined
themselves as Muslim countries and have actively attempted to
exercise influence in and provide leadership to the ummah. In so doing,
they have competed with each other in sponsoring organizations,
funding Islamic groups, providing support to the fighters in
Afghanistan, and wooing the Muslim peoples of Central Asia.

Iran has the size, central location, population, historical traditions, oil resources,
and middle level of economic development which would qualify it to
be an Islamic core state. Ninety percent of Muslims, however, are
Sunni and Iran is Shi’ite; Persian is a distant second to Arabic as the
language of Islam; and the relations between Persians and Arabs have
historically been antagonistic.


Pakistan has size, population, and military prowess, and its leaders
have fairly consistently tried to claim a role as the promoter of
cooperation among Islamic states and the speaker for Islam to the rest
of the world. Pakistan is, however, relatively poor and suffers serious
internal ethnic and regional divisions, a record of political instability,
and a fixation on the problem of its security vis-à-vis India, which
accounts in large part for its interest in developing close relations with
other Islamic countries, as well as non-Muslim powers like China and
the United States.

Saudi Arabia was the original home of Islam; Islam’s holiest shrines
are there; its language is Islam’s language; it has the world’s largest oil
reserves and the resulting financial influence; and its government has
shaped Saudi society along strictly Islamic lines. During the 1970s and
1980s Saudi Arabia was the single most influential force in Islam. It
spent billions of dollars supporting Muslim causes throughout the
world, from mosques and textbooks to political parties, Islamist
organizations, and terrorist movements, and was relatively
indiscriminate in doing so. On the other hand, its relatively small
population and geographical vulnerability make it dependent on the
West for its security.

Finally, Turkey has the history, population, middle level of economic
development, national coherence, and military tradition and
competence to be the core state of Islam. In explicitly defining Turkey
as a secular society, however, Ataturk prevented the Turkish republic
from succeeding the Ottoman empire in that role. Turkey could not
even become a charter member of the OIC because of the commitment
to secularism in its constitution. So long as Turkey continues to define
itself as a secular state, leadership of Islam is denied it.
 
Arabs and Iranians should unite, hold each other's hands, and work together against Israel. If they continue to fight within themselves, they will all become losers.
GCC states major issue, oil rigging companies are US or European, banking channels are Western, transportation system is Western, business infrastructure is tally under US Western laws and regulation. Basically, nothing in there end. Unfortunately, this is war of resources. For example Iraq whole oil infrastructure operated by US Halliburton, from refining to transportation to US.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
@Watandar @HAIDER

One must accept reality and truth even its not what you wanted to hear or even if its against your emotions. "Disliking" or liking shouldn't be done based on personal biases but should be bases on reality.

Read my post again which was in response to a post that declared "Iran" as leader of muslim world lol. I challenge you to pick any point and prove it wrong. Okay leave Syria as we can have differences in our point of views. But there's a lot more in my rest of the post and that is 100% agreeable for anybody who knows basics of geopolitics. Do you guys really think Iran fought this war not for itself but for "muslim world". You guys believe in such simplistic theory? You guys believe if any muslim country is attacked then Iran would come to help ?? Why Iran didn't fired missiles at Israel when Israel was comitting genocide at Gaza ?? How a country can be a leader when no other muslim country accepts it as so or wants to follow it ? Let's be realistic with ourselves. I can write tons of arguements that this war is Iran's own national war. It was not for Gaza and it certainly was not for muslim world. Be realistic please.
It's a war of nostalgic delusions nurtured by hubris .... nothing to do with islam
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top