Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

[hasssanali8998]

eat the small ones

i assume UAE is the small fish ??

 

[Homajon]

Iran produces 100 ballistic missiles per month or 1200 missiles that can reach Israel per year.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

Since Iran launched 2181 ballistic missiles (MRBMs and SRBMs) during the 40 Day War and CIA says Iran still has 70% of its pre-war arsenal, we can say that before the war Iran had more than 7200 ballistic missiles in total.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

Based on Israeli report from 20.02.2026 that says Iran produces 100 missiles per month (1200 missiles per year) and can have 5000 ballistic missiles that can reach Israel by 2027, we can estimate that out of these 7200 ballistic missiles 3800 missiles were MRBMs and 3400 missiles were SRBMs.

Israel racing to curb Iran missile surge, warns 'no airtight solution' to thousands of rockets

IDF officials estimate Iran could possess at least 5,000 ballistic missiles by 2027, producing about 100 per month, and say layered air defenses cannot fully prevent damage from sustained, large-scale barrages

www.ynetnews.com

During the 40 Day War Iran launched 2181 ballistic missiles of which 700 MRBMs at Israel and Jordan and 1481 SRBMs at Gulf countries.

So, currently Iran has 3100 MRBMs and 1919 SRBMs = 5019 ballistic missiles in total.

With this arsenal Iran can continue fighting for another 92 days.

You place way too much importance in what some people say.

Nobody knows how much Iran already produced and nobody knows how much Iran can produce.....regardless on what Iranian or non-Iranian officials say, we will never know what is going on in tunnels and under mountains.

 

[tsunset]

You place way too much importance in what some people say.

Nobody knows how much Iran already produced and nobody knows how much Iran can produce.....regardless on what Iranian or non-Iranian officials say, we will never know what is going on in tunnels and under mountains.

Iran will never run out of missiles unless the bases are blown up

Iran has missiles for at least a decade with daily strikes

 

[Taimoor]

i assume UAE is the small fish ??

If boys decide, they wont last a day.

 

[Meengla]

True, but then he will just move on to his next goal's/demands.
Just rinse and repeat with Benni, never staisfied.
America will do his/Israel's/The Zionist's bidding like always. A sick situation.

Really? Tell me which POTUS before Trump had allowed a direct attack on Iran despite decades of similar Mossad/Netanyahu 'presentations' given to the Presidents before Trump II? Which American President had ceded the Golan Heights to Israel, made Jerusalem Israel's capital, and killed a high stature person like Suleimani? And those actions were done under Trump's first term of relative 'peace' in the Middle East. The personality of a US President is playing an outsized role by openly throwing away the checks and balances of the past and there is no stopping it. Biden was worse, Trump is the worst.

Sorry to say but your kinds of posts is the reason the Middle East is in a mess. Your kind of posts don't take into considerations the actions of American Presidents due to personal biases of the POTUS, the comparative hold of AIPAC on both American political parties, the 'vote bank' biases between the two main American political parties. And you seem oblivious of the changing political winds in America where even former MAGAs are distancing from the war on Iran and where 38 out of 50 some Democratic Senators recently voted to block arm sales to Israel.

Change in the Middle East and indeed in the world is going come from change in American policies and policies are drafted by politicians and for them to change policies, in a democracy like America, critical thinking, smart politics, and voting with brain matters--and not falling for a Republican plant like the Green Party's candidate Jill Stein to divide the Progressive vote.

 

[hussain0216]

70 days of complete digital blackout. That's at least $4.9 billion down the drain. The upper estimate is $5.6 billion, and counting... If this situation stays the same for a year, that will add up to $27 billion. Almost half of our oil exports with peak price and peak volume of export.

Add to it over half a million layoffs in the IT sector in the past 3 months, half a million and counting. Yet, some people here think that Iran is winning... lol

The Ayatollahs have managed to shrink Iran's nominal GDP from $500 billion in 2010 to $125 billion in 2025 and now they plan to wipe out another $30-$50 billion from Iran's already destroyed economy. For a better comparison, Iran's population in 2010 was 77 million and it's 93 million now.

Buddy you are at WAR

This is going to be painful and costly, that's just the way it is

This war has been waged against Iran for 46 years

The fact that Iran is even standing is a miracle
The resistance Iran has put up is incredible, very few nations could do it and Iran could change the world with the fallout from this war

I get it you have a issue with the Mullahs but those guys have been ruthless and the only reason Iran hasn't been taken over and can still remain a free state with the hope of becoming a hegemon in the middle east

This war means that any changes to the system will need to be delayed, as you can't give any hint of a propaganda victory to the U.S or Israel and any protest needs to be limited or outrightly crushed

The objective now should be to utilize the pressure build up to get sanctions removed and get the U.S out of the middle east and put Iran into a strong position

 

[Dark Knight]

Really? Tell me which POTUS before Trump had allowed a direct attack on Iran despite decades of similar Mossad/Netanyahu 'presentations' given to the Presidents before Trump II? Which American President had ceded the Golan Heights to Israel, made Jerusalem Israel's capital, and killed a high stature person like Suleimani? And those actions were done under Trump's first term of relative 'peace' in the Middle East. The personality of a US President is playing an outsized role by openly throwing away the checks and balances of the past and there is no stopping it. Biden was worse, Trump is the worst.

Sorry to say but your kinds of posts is the reason the Middle East is in a mess. Your kind of posts don't take into considerations the actions of American Presidents due to personal biases of the POTUS, the comparative hold of AIPAC on both American political parties, the 'vote bank' biases between the two main American political parties. And you seem oblivious of the changing political winds in America where even former MAGAs are distancing from the war on Iran and where 38 out of 50 some Democratic Senators recently voted to block arm sales to Israel.

Change in the Middle East and indeed in the world is going come from change in American policies and policies are drafted by politicians and for them to change policies, in a democracy like America, critical thinking, smart politics, and voting with brain matters--and not falling for a Republican plant like the Green Party's candidate Jill Stein to divide the Progressive vote.

My reply was a general reply to Netanyahu and his lifetime agenda of making sure any Muslim nation let alone Iran obtaining Nuclear technology which they do not control/have access to directly or indirectly.

Other American President like you mentioned may not have directly or indirectly attacked Iran or other Muslim majority countries, but there action's like using UN veto's has led to harm not only to Iran but other Muslim population's like Palestine by Israel and Zionist's.

Trump just had the ball's to do it openly, the other's just did it privately.

Just my opinion.

 

[Meengla]

Other American President like you mentioned may not have directly or indirectly attacked Iran or other Muslim majority countries, but there action's like using UN veto's has led to harm not only to Iran but other Muslim population's like Palestine by Israel and Zionist's.
Trump just had the ball's to do it openly, the other's just did it privately.

Israel was America's necessity during the Cold War and then become a crucial tool for the Petro Dollars purposes but no American President had every allowed Israel to directly launch an attack on Israel until this Zionist Trump II Presidency came, on top of Trump's actions for Israel in his first term. Facts matter and smart voting also matter.

This post of me as well as the post you quoted of me are not a personal note to you but to illustrate how casually people think, how they think in a democracy like America smart politics doesn't matter, how they discount the changing winds in American politics, which is turning against Israel.

 

[Dark Knight]

This post of me as well as the post you quoted of me are not a personal note to you

I know that.

 

[BHAN85]

Really? Tell me which POTUS before Trump had allowed a direct attack on Iran despite decades of similar Mossad/Netanyahu 'presentations' given to the Presidents before Trump II? Which American President had ceded the Golan Heights to Israel, made Jerusalem Israel's capital, and killed a high stature person like Suleimani? And those actions were done under Trump's first term of relative 'peace' in the Middle East. The personality of a US President is playing an outsized role by openly throwing away the checks and balances of the past and there is no stopping it. Biden was worse, Trump is the worst.

Sorry to say but your kinds of posts is the reason the Middle East is in a mess. Your kind of posts don't take into considerations the actions of American Presidents due to personal biases of the POTUS, the comparative hold of AIPAC on both American political parties, the 'vote bank' biases between the two main American political parties. And you seem oblivious of the changing political winds in America where even former MAGAs are distancing from the war on Iran and where 38 out of 50 some Democratic Senators recently voted to block arm sales to Israel.

Change in the Middle East and indeed in the world is going come from change in American policies and policies are drafted by politicians and for them to change policies, in a democracy like America, critical thinking, smart politics, and voting with brain matters--and not falling for a Republican plant like the Green Party's candidate Jill Stein to divide the Progressive vote.

Qaddafi killing and Syria civil war was under Obama administration, more hypocrite than Trump, less blatant but same rogue behavior.

Besides serious harass from USA to Iran in 2011/2012.

 

[Persian Gulf]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[ShapurII]

Buddy you are at WAR

War has nothing to do with a digital blackout. This is not the first war in the world since the internet has been created.

This is going to be painful and costly, that's just the way it is

It's supposed to be painful and costly because your enemy is attacking you, not because you're ruled by a bunch of fools that are ruining the country by their stupid decisions.

This war has been waged against Iran for 46 years

Not really. Iran had strong political and economic ties with Europe, Japan, South Korea, Russia and China before 2008. Europe purchased 20% of Iran's oil before the last round of UNSC sanctions. Japan purchased a huge chunk of our oil too, close to 15% if I remember correctly. So did South Korea and India. The French companies like Peugeot and Citroen had large projects with Iran Khodro. Mercedes Benz produced diesel engines in Iran. LG and Samsung had official headquarters in Iran, just to name a few. German and Italian home appliances had after-sales support in Iran.

The fact that Iran is even standing is a miracle

I fail to see why it's a miracle. Iran is a large resourceful nation with one of the world's largest population of STEM graduates. Houthis of Yemen fought back for 3 months with nearly nothing. How is this a miracle exactly? If anything, it's a joke that Iran accepted the ceasefire after 40 days while Yemenis fought back for 120 days.

The resistance Iran has put up is incredible, very few nations could do it and Iran could change the world with the fallout from this war

Not really. It was incredible before Week 4 of the war. Things started to change after Week 4. Something changed internally and Iran was forced to become passive.

I get it you have a issue with the Mullahs but those guys have been ruthless and the only reason Iran hasn't been taken over and can still remain a free state with the hope of becoming a hegemon in the middle east

How is Iran a free state exactly? Iran is rather isolated than free.
If you can be coerced into accepting things that are against your national interest, you're not a free state. If you have to suck up to countries that have betrayed you repeatedly in recent history, you are not free.

This war means that any changes to the system will need to be delayed, as you can't give any hint of a propaganda victory to the U.S or Israel and any protest needs to be limited or outrightly crushed

That's not how it works. State brutality only accelerates the downfall of the system and opens the possibility of civil war. The system is falling and everyone can see it. Every time the system faces a new challenge, it chooses a path that brings it closer to destruction. The system has chosen to self-destruct, it seems.

The objective now should be to utilize the pressure build up to get sanctions removed and get the U.S out of the middle east and put Iran into a strong position

Be serious. Why should the US lift the sanctions? They have a way to destroy Iran with minimal cost and you think they'll just give it up for no reason? Why would they do that? Do they love the Mullahs or what?

You guys really think that the US which is owned by the Zionist lobby will magically change its mind and decide to leave Iran alone? The same Iran that cannot kill even 100 Americans after being bombed for 40 days by the US? The US is preparing for another round of escalation, if anything.

 

[r3alist]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[ShapurII]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

The US wanted a 45-day ceasefire and it seems that they have their ceasefire exactly as they wanted it. Claiming Iran had accepted a 2-week ceasefire was only a face saving measure by the regime in Iran.

 

[Meengla]

Qaddafi killing and Syria civil war was under Obama administration, more hypocrite than Trump, less blatant but same rogue behavior.
Besides serious harass from USA to Iran in 2011/2012.

To quote the dear departed great philosopher John Pilger: 'Democrats have been rapacious on foreign wars for half a century'. There is no excuse to be made for Democrats policies either. BUT the winds are starting to change their directions in America where a far larger number of Democrats are against foreign wars, especially in the Middle East, than the Republicans are.
This war on Iran was denied to Israel by every American President until this Zionist Trump came to office. Trump's political base is anti Muslim, anti immigrant, Rapture Seekers, and racist even though I recognize in his base there are many who are patriotic Americans who want fiscal responsibility and not appeasing the lazy asses in the American society for votes, which the Democrats do. But as far as the Middle East is concern, I have no doubt should a Democrat be the POTUS in 2028 then we will see a major shift which will not please Israel at all.