Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

[Pakistan First]

DPRK regiment has fought in Ukraine and Russia has extensively used theater NK ballistic missiles. DPRK soldiers performed poorly. Dozens were captured and the NK BM's were unreliable and inaccurate.

Russia had to devise depot level modification kits to their guidance to try to improve accuracy/ reliability.

However no further orders for NK equipment have been placed by the Russians. And the survivors of the DPRK soldiers have long returned home after losing thousands on the Donbas frontlines.

Bro, when I say Iran and Pakistan are novices in front of NK when it comes to ballistic missiles is because of hard facts. Check their missiles, they are tracked by the US. They know and are aware of its capabilities, the altitude and speed which those missiles attains.

Also, both Iran and Pakistan have had their first true IRBMs almost copied from North Korean Ballistic missiles.
Here's AI saying: "North Korea provided the blueprints and technology for its Nodong and BM-25 missiles. Iran manufactured these under its own names"

and I know same for Ghauri for Pakistan's case. Apart from the software most of its hardware was NK origin. North Koreans advanced to ICBMs and MiRVs much earlier too.

Ukrainians are fighting bravely and they got support of Europe too, so can't just decide with one small North korean platoon doing not good as overall North korea as walkover. Its not. Its a massive missile and nuclear power.

 

[Lulldapull]

Bro, when I say Iran and Pakistan are novices in front of NK when it comes to ballistic missiles is because of hard facts. Check their missiles, they are tracked by the US. They know and are aware of its capabilities, the altitude and speed which those missiles attains.

Also, both Iran and Pakistan have had their first true IRBMs almost copied from North Korean Ballistic missiles.
Here's AI saying: "North Korea provided the blueprints and technology for its Nodong and BM-25 missiles. Iran manufactured these under its own names"

and I know same for Ghauri for Pakistan's case. Apart from the software most of its hardware was NK origin. North Koreans advanced to ICBMs and MiRVs much earlier too.

Ukrainians are fighting bravely and they got support of Europe too, so can't just decide with one small North korean platoon doing not good as overall North korea as walkover. Its not. Its a massive missile and nuclear power.

Oh bhai fat kim regularly tests his IRBM's near here in either the Sea of Japan or the korean straits and half them fail during launch or break apart mid flight or fall way short of target or miss their targets by hundreds of miles.

Nobody is scared of the DPRK military. They are really a very poor country on Chinese/ Russian life support.

All those ICBM tech you're talking about are some Topol TEL's/ missiles that Imam Putin has given to fat kim for helping him out in Ukraine.

About half of the North Korean missiles Russia fired at Ukraine flew off course and exploded in the air, official says

The failure rate of the North Korean ballistic missiles Russia is firing at Ukraine appears to be quite high, Ukraine's top prosecutor told Reuters.

www.businessinsider.com

Iran is like a century ahead of poor old NK technologically.

DPRK is a mere $4 billion dolla economy.

Billo Raani can purchase the DPRK if he ever got serious.......lol

 

[Pakistan First]

Iran is like a century ahead of poor old NK technologically.

Bro, they are building nuclear submarines now and within few years you will see for yourself.

Putin never gave them ICBMs.

North Korea gave missile technology to Iran in 80s to 90s. NK is completely different level.

 

[Homajon]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

I don't think he really means it. He wants to create leverage ahead of talks with the US:
"If you don't give us what we want, we will turn to China!"

 

[Hassan Al-Somal]

"Israeli" supporters are up in arms, opposing the US - Iranian agreement.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[TAC]

I heard and read that between a third and half the air to ground campaign was made by israeli fighters. Not to speak of the lebanon one.
Is it minimal ?

Aren’t Israeli fighters just US fighters with a different flag on? What could they contribute without US freebies?

 

[TAC]

It is only prudent to wait to see the terms first before suffering from premature celebration from any side. and I have maintained that from the beginning.

The Orange Clowns' bluster is immaterial.

(The real demons hide in the details, always.)

Yeah but we already know those terms don’t include Iran’s ‘total surrender’ and US taking Iran’s oil.
The US seems oddly reluctant to reveal the details of its ‘great victory’. Not like Orange idiot to be so shy.

 

[VCheng]

we already know those terms

No, we do not.

First the MoU. Then the final agreement in 60 days or more. These are just the first steps, and even here the terms are not known yet.

 

[mangekyo]

And what exactly are the American options after, say, 2 months or 4 months or one year? Bring an armada of vessels to attack Iran again? Build up the forces in the US bases near Iran, build up those bases and radars, only to be in short range of the Iranian missiles? Even if Iran maintains its current depleted stockpiles of missiles and drones, in future they would be still enough to give back a lethal blow.

It is over, guys, it is over as far as a direct American involvement in a war on Iran. Per my understanding, it was already over when a ceasefire was announced in April this year.

Im guessing we will return to the pre-war status quo. Sanctions will remain. I don’t see them lifting them. Maybe some sanctions, but not the most important ones.

 

[TAC]

No, we do not.

First the MoU. Then the final agreement in 60 days or more. These are just the first steps, and even here the terms are not known yet.

Suggest you read / quote / reply to the whole sentence not just the first few words of the sentence.
US just got handed worldwide humiliation. Hiding behind waiting for terms isn’t about to change that.

 

[VCheng]

US just got handed worldwide humiliation. Hiding behind waiting for terms isn’t about to change that.

LOL. That cannot be determined until the final outcomes are established. And that is the correct way to look at it rather than rush to declare premature victory.

 

[Abdul q]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

I don't think he really means it. He wants to create leverage ahead of talks with the US:
"If you don't give us what we want, we will turn to China!"

I hope they don’t give chabahar to their beloved phrand india before closing up to China

 

[Meengla]

"Israeli" supporters are up in arms, opposing the US - Iranian agreement.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

Is this the good old David Frum, one of the prominent Israel Firster/ Neo Con.
No doubt they are in a meltdown.

 

[TAC]

LOL. That cannot be determined until the final outcomes are established. And that is the correct way to look at it rather than rush to declare premature victory.

LOL. Whatever helps you cope.

 

[AZ_HighCountry]

"Israeli" supporters are up in arms, opposing the US - Iranian agreement.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

To your point, here in the US, it's mid term season. The usual suspects on both sides of the aisle in Congress are raising their "concerns".

Kind of makes you wonder who is really owned by Israel. The President? Or the ones who control the purse strings?