Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

[RescueRanger]

Another large coronet incoming via Glasgow (UK)

 

[Meengla]

If Iran kept fighting for 30-60 days, the U.S. would have given Iran the strait. Yes Iran would have lost probably some bridges and some oil installations and refineries, but so would have the entire Arab world. Thus further exacerbating the oil issue instead of 13MBPD, imagine 20M, then imagine 30M.

Looking at how many times Iran has been targeted over the last several years-you know, Suleimani, the attacks on nuclear plants, assassinations of scientists--it doesn't appear like Iran has the capability to face a Superpower. Iran has not even been able to do the required deterrent damage to Israel. The recent ceasefire was maybe a dire requirement/necessity for Iran itself to replenish. And the hostilities going on are happening too soon for the attacking forces to be replenished like before the Feb. 28th attack started. And the global oil reserves can't be sufficiently replenished in such a short period of ceasefire and so the Trumpian 'Herbert Hoover' threat probably still remains.

As long as both Trump and Netanyahu remain in their respective offices, we should expect at least low level conflict against Iran to continue. Remove one of them from the equation, I see a quick draw down.

 

[White Privilege]

I'm sure Iran will react. What do you think is the best for Iran to do now, at the moment (except building nukes, almost all of us agree)?

Iran must have nukes, no question on that. These new strikes could be US frustration at stalled peace talks, I doubt it will yield any different long term result.

 

[Professor Jiang]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[Pakistan Space Agency]

... No need to do anything.......just keep it closed tight and let the GCC starve to death.

In the real world, attacks on a Saudi and Qatari oil tankers has lead to 80 US airstrikes on Iran on day one. Hundreds of not thousands of jobs probably lost for years to come

Maybe you should get yourself a one way ticket to motherland Iran and feel the brunt of those 80 airstrikes like the Iranian people are doing instead of yapping safely from far away US colony of Japan.

 

[Meengla]

NATO is a defensive group. Article 5 was invoked only once and NATO's history.
United States invoked article 5 after 9/11

"defensive" only in name. They work with America in launching unprovoked attacks like on Libya which led to Qaddafi's regime ending. More examples of that. By even providing the bases and more in Europe to launch attacks on Gaza or Iran and elsewhere, NATO countries are totally involved. May not be 'officially' but they are and when any of them decides not to be part of those attacks--like Spain just did--then we see how they are treated.
Europeans are opportunist slaves of America and cowardly too.

 

[Bratva]

1. It hasn't happened yet.
2. You can cheer that, but know that if it ever happens, it will be the end of existence for countries like Bahrain and Kuwait + cities like Dubai and Doha.

Iranians would survive that. Persian Gulf statelets would be depopulated by a reciprocal Iranian response.

Magi was cursing reformists. I reminded him it was reformists who were able to save millions of Iranians and billions of dollar of Infra from USA/Israel when they negotiated for a ceasefire. Your military wasn't capable enough to save critical Infra. There was no conventional victory. A stalemate achieved which trump was gonna break with the attacks on Iranian infrastructure and with Kurds invading Irani border areas from Iraq.

Reformists were gonna get billions of dollar unsanctioned and were actively working for the sanctions to be removed so Iran can start exporting oil to whole world and be prosper once again. Reformists were able to reign in Israel in Lebanon too to some extent. America and Iran were not reneging on their promises and MoU were almost being upheld.

And then Iran let all of it go by attacking ships transiting through Oman by extremist elements in Iran who can't see reformists win? When Iran Attacked the ships in Omani waters, what deal Americans were breaking that Iran had to punish them? It was not written in MoU that Iran can control Omani waters.

Was it worth letting billions of sanctioned iranian money go? was it not worth getting off the sanctions hook finally and make Iran great again with Oil and gas and rebuilding Iran?

Is it worth it now that extremists has finally won by attacking civilian ships and had sidelined Ghalibaf and Agarchi and President?

 

[Flotilla]

Looking at how many times Iran has been targeted over the last several years-you know, Suleimani, the attacks on nuclear plants, assassinations of scientists--it doesn't appear like Iran has the capability to face a Superpower. Iran has not even been able to do the required deterrent damage to Israel. The recent ceasefire was maybe a dire requirement/necessity for Iran itself to replenish. And the hostilities going on are happening too soon for the attacking forces to be replenished like before the Feb. 28th attack started. And the global oil reserves can't be sufficiently replenished in such a short period of ceasefire and so the Trumpian 'Herbert Hoover' threat probably still remains.

As long as both Trump and Netanyahu remain in their respective offices, we should expect at least low level conflict against Iran to continue. Remove one of them from the equation, I see a quick draw down.

I don't agree.
Right now Israel is outside of the tit for tat retaliatory strikes. And that is IMO for two reasons,
One It is because Irán did much more damage than recognized by Israel (you have a hint in Haifa port, where damage was more extense and even some warships were hit).
And second Netanyahu have always highlighted that they are out of any agreement.
So if he doesn't attack It is because some deterrence has been reach by Irán.
And finally, don't forget that Irán still have the nuclear key at their hands. So if there is a low intensity strikes for years, Islamic Republic will finally pull out from the NPT and develop nuclear weapons.
But that is just my oppinion.
The reality is unquestionable, this situation is unsustainable. Let's see how evolve.

 

[Meengla]

Not to mention it's nuclear deterrent. That 'tiny little Israel: could make most of the Middle East uninhabitable if a Samson option event occurred.
Some here might not want to hear it but you laid it out exactly with all the technological stuff going on there. It's the 21st century

The Samson Option is so over-rated--as much as it is unlikely. There is no achievment in self immolation. Poor countries like Pakistan, North Korea, and India can also turn large parts of the world 'uninhabitable'.
Israel maybe a very good technological power and this maybe 'the 21st century' but human beings are essentially the same pre-historic beasts where force, power, endurance, fortitude can prevail over the nano-chips: Israel needs massive American help just to fight a militia like Hezbollah.

 

[Lulldapull]

In the real world, attacks on a Saudi and Qatari oil tankers has lead to 80 US airstrikes on Iran on day one. Hundreds of not thousands of jobs probably lost for years to come

Maybe you should get yourself a one way ticket to motherland Iran and feel the brunt of those 80 airstrikes like the Iranian people are doing instead of yapping safely from far away US colony of Japan.

No you go sign up for the IDF right now and go fight for Shetanyahu in Sawdi Judea, since you live in the US colony of UK.

 

[RescueRanger]

No you go sign up for the IDF right now and go fight for Shetanyahu in Sawdi Judea, since you live in the US colony of UK.

Guys please, let's not resort to personal attacks. Please. Allow each other to air opinions without slinging mud, it spoils the mood and derails this thread.

 

[Bratva]

I don't agree.
Right now Israel is outside of the tit for tat retaliatory strikes. And that is IMO for two reasons,
One It is because Irán did much more damage than recognized by Israel (you have a hint in Haifa port, where damage was more extense and even some warships were hit).
And second Netanyahu have always highlighted that they are out of any agreement.
So if he doesn't attack It is because some deterrence has been reach by Irán.
And finally, don't forget that Irán still have the nuclear key at their hands. So if there is a low intensity strikes for years, Islamic Republic will finally pull out from the NPT and develop nuclear weapons.
But that is just my oppinion.
The reality is unquestionable, this situation is unsustainable. Let's see how evolve.

ThankGod you mentioned that whatever you wrote here is your personal opinion. People in this thread knows it was trump who pressured Netanyahu and leashed him which prevented Israel to attack Iran during negotiations. So when you make big claims that Iran established deterrence over Israel, do back the fantastical claims with proper links.

https://www.axios.com/2026/07/04/trump-israel-netanyahu-white-house-meeting-iran

Trump cursed at Netanyahu in call over Lebanon escalation, sources say

President Donald Trump cursed at Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu during a roughly 15-minute phone call on Monday, sources told ABC News.

abc7.com

 

[ShapurII]

Magi was cursing reformists. I reminded him it was reformists who were able to save millions of Iranians and billions of dollar of Infra from USA/Israel when they negotiated for a ceasefire. Your military wasn't capable enough to save critical Infra. There was no conventional victory. A stalemate achieved which trump was gonna break with the attacks on Iranian infrastructure and with Kurds invading Irani border areas from Iraq.

Reformists were gonna get billions of dollar unsanctioned and were actively working for the sanctions to be removed so Iran can start exporting oil to whole world and be prosper once again. Reformists were able to reign in Israel in Lebanon too to some extent. America and Iran were not reneging on their promises and MoU were almost being upheld.

And then Iran let all of it go by attacking ships transiting through Oman by extremist elements in Iran who can't see reformists win? When Iran Attacked the ships in Omani waters, what deal Americans were breaking that Iran had to punish them? It was not written in MoU that Iran can control Omani waters.

Is it worth letting go billions of sanctioned iranian money, getting off the sanctions hook finally and make Iran great again with Oil and gas and rebuilding Iran.

Is it worth it now that extremists has finally won by attacking civilian ships and had sidelined Ghalibaf and Agarchi and President?

If you think Iran was going to get billions of dollars unsanctioned, I have a bridge to sell you.

 

[Meengla]

I reckon Israel is more likely to assassinate Trump to implicate Iran for this to get USA reprisal attacks on Iran, as that serves its interests, than Iran will who lack the capability to do so.
It may well all depend on when the direct control and usefulness of Trump runs out?

Not out of question. Not at all! Israelis, including even Miriam Adelson, were cursing Trump for the recent MOU. And just before this war began, a credible analyst like Max Blumenthal was implying that Trump fears for his life.

 

[RescueRanger]

Trump sharing click bait AI enhanced fake news ONCE again... Twitter account: Open Source Intel is a known Hasbara tout. Firstly this image isn't from 2026, its from 2025:


Secondly the image has been digitally enhanced: