Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes, but after 200 years. I'll let you work that one out![]()
You had nothing coherent to come up with... ground yourself first before making an argument.
Duh!
Iran shut down because it stopped the flow... it had the casus belli to do so because ...
UNCLOS ALREADY allows 12 nautical miles of territorial waters. Hormuz is 21 miles... these are territorial waters between Oman and Iran... that served uninterrupted, unencumbered as international trade routes.
US created a security situation that made Iran close them... too hard for you... then just move along.
Oman was to negotiate passage post the final deal between US(aggressor) and Iran(aggrieved). US threatened Oman and started the southern corridor outside of the one agreed in the MoU where Iran was to allow ships to pass.
Don't bother if that didn't go down your throat.
Economic pressure is secondary... US navy is keeping a distance. The fifth fleet is evacuated. A few instances to transit vessels ended up with missiles flying and was not attempted.
It still hasn't... the oil flow and transit of commercial vessels under the new regime puts Iranian interests first.
Take the time.
Do people still doubt nothing is off limits to protect the petro dollar?OMG!
Are people still predicting a land invasion lol
It's hard for me to explain to you why your statements is offensive if you don't naturally understand why.
In general, your are treating this war of aggression launched by Trump
Israel cannot operate without a pliant USA.
Free meal will end.
Next election will be fought on forever wars and support for Israel.
Whichever candidate denounces Israel will win.
Unlikely. BUT Iran must prepare for this possibility nevertheless. Firstly, it would be folly to disregard this possibility. Secondly, a repulsion of a ground attack seems to remain Iran's best option for some sort of military victory (by causing significant casualties to the invaders).OMG!
Are people still predicting a land invasion lol
Oh I get it.Yes, but after 200 years. I'll let you work that one out![]()
Thing is one cant discount a land invasion, trump is senile and tripping on power. To try and claim victory he might go to great lengths, he doesnt care for the death of US soldiers its more an image thing for him. A land invasion will be much worse for the US and trump.OMG!
Are people still predicting a land invasion lol
Dude, I respect you but he got you. lolBecause potentially you have a sick imagination about potentially what could happen.
For example, do you see me being as offended as you are about what Iran can potentially do to USA with its death chants, if they ever get a nuclear weapon?
Dude, I respect you but he got you. lol
Do people still doubt nothing is off limits to protect the petro dollar?
I think he worded it perfectly, so I am going to quote himLOL. Over what? A simple arithmetic answer to a potential issue raised by YOU!
Nah. Nope.
All the more reason for the Iranian leadership to pay heed to what might potentially happen. This is for them to decide. Nothing to do with me at all.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.