Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

[VCheng]

In Iran the U.S. relies heavily on aerial bombardment, cyber warfare, sanctions and diplomatic pressure.

Sir, war is war. It is always fought with ALL available resources, as best as possible. Always.

 

[Lulldapull]

You need a reset factory, mate. Just making fun..

And when I make fun of these guys, I get picked on.......

 

[Persian Gulf]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

Iranian Army fired drones at Al-Azraq Base in Jordan, targeting F-18 fighter jets

TBD if any impacts were recorded. video showed at least 6 drones being fired.

 

[Immortals]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[Shags101]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

Making them use their interceptors what they have left on everything in the skies

 

[lightning f57]

US has been doing land invasions on countries almost every decade.
I don't think there will be any problem for US planners to pursue their objectives via land invasion.

Tell me last time when they invade a country the size of western Europe full of mountains?

US objectives:
1- Complete surrender of Nuclear Program to US
2- Zero iranian control over SoH.

These are likely trumps goals

Plan
1- Softening up Iranian military backbone through consistent yet extensive bombing campaign - pretty much achieved in 40-day compaign

I dont think that has been achieved, Iran continues to attack US bases and hit ships that try to cross SOH without its permission.

US has the endurance of 10-20 years of occupying foreign countries but unlike Brits, they almost never succeed in making Other countries their colonies.
If Iran can endure this for a decade or two, it's their war to win.

They never occupied a country the size of Iran with 90m people.

 

[Shags101]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

Curious with who is the American navy actually in the area or are these Arab navies curious why the Kuwait military vessel was hit

 

[Lulldapull]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

Jordan claimed it intercepted 4/4 ballistic missiles launched by Iran overnight

This video shows multiple Iranian missiles impacting (at least 4), with no interceptions seen, despite Jordan firing at least 8 PAC-3 interceptors (cost of $32 million), depleted for no purpose. flawless Iranian victory.

There seems to be no data link to the guidance radar? They just seem to have been fired blindly/ shot gunned straight into the air in the general direction of the incoming Iranian wave?

Are these Sawdi on Captagon? or Fentanyl?

Why would they just launch them blind with no guidance? this is just wasting millions no?

 

[RescueRanger]

Sir, war is war. It is always fought with ALL available resources, as best as possible. Always.

This statement is flawed. During WWI the French deployed all their "available resources" without an understanding of the technical capability of the enemy. The French infantry marched into battle wearing highly visible dark blue coats and bright red trousers. The tragic reliance of 19th century uniform design and massed frontal attacks against entrenched German machine gunners resulted in the catastrophic loss of nearly 27,000 French men.

By 1915 the French were forced to bow to the realities of modern warfare at the time, which resulted in the ditching of the bright blue coats, the development of the first French combat helmet and abandoning massed frontal marches to the footnotes of military history.

There are plenty of examples like this, smart nations keep their biggest cards closest to their chests.

Crossing at a ford occurs often in a man's lifetime. It means setting sail even though your friends stay in harbour, knowing the route, knowing the soundness of your ship and the favour of the day.

- Miyamoto Musashi

 

[hussain0216]

Do people still doubt nothing is off limits to protect the petro dollar?

It's not that the west and U.S in particular aren't scum who would love to occupy Iran

It's just that the actual logistics are very very difficult and improbable

Iran is a very large state with 93 million people and a large military
It also has offensive missile and drone options

1-So how many troops will the U.S need to invade a nation of 93 million?

2-Where will those troops base themselves and how will they launch an invasion of Iran?

3-How will they stop Iran blasting those troops and launchpad with missiles and drones?

4-How will thousands -millions of troops actually get to their base/launchpad? Slow moving troop ships or aircraft?

5- How much preparation does the U.S require to deploy thousands of troops, does Congress, the country and troops plus families need to be notified?

And honestly I could go on and on and on



Is their a risk of a all scale land grab of karg island or something, sure, maybe, but as long as Iran can fire missiles and drones
Then it's pointless, because they will just insert U.S troops into a unwinnable situation where they will simply be picked off and killed and the invasion will be crushed and a propaganda nightmare




The U.S will hit Iran from air and hopes Iran will capitulate

Iran needs to keep fighting, absorb attacks and remember the effect on the U.S and world economy is the REAL WEAPON

And it's needs to control the Hormuz and enforce a toll, to obtain money to repair the billions on damage it has occurred

 

[VCheng]

There are plenty of examples like this, smart nations keep their biggest cards closest to their chests.

Yes, that is precisely the "as best as possible" part. The resources are one thing; the strategy to deploy them is the other.

 

[RescueRanger]

Yes, that is precisely the "as best as possible" part. The resources are one thing; the strategy to deploy them is the other.

Up to the Iranians to figure that one out and how best to utilize them.

 

[hussain0216]

Oil continues rising despite Trump dropping Hormuz ‘reimbursement fee’​

The price of international Brent crude oil has risen more than 10% since Sunday, to levels not seen since June.

Oil hits $87 per barrel again after latest U.S. strikes on Iran and looming blockade

The price of international Brent crude oil has risen more than 10% since Sunday, to levels not seen since June.

www.nbcnews.com

As reserves draw down, oil prices will increase quickly

It's just speculation that keeps it low, hoping that this will just be another limited exchange

 

[VCheng]

Up to the Iranians to figure that one out and how best to utilize them.

Absolutely yes! That is what I have been saying all along.

Feeling aggrieved, or wronged, or calling the other belligerent side the aggressor may feel justified, but it has absolutely nothing to do with the actual conduct of the war in response.

It must be ruthless and using all resources as best as possible. War is war.

 

[Master Chief]

Yes, that is precisely the "as best as possible" part. The resources are one thing; the strategy to deploy them is the other.

So you are suggesting that resources are always deployed optimally in wars?

That it is inconceivable for a belligerent party to intentionally underplay their hand as a deliberate "feint", tactically or strategically?

E.g. The Punic Wars, Hannibal Barca deployed perfect feints against the Roman enemy repeatedly on multiple different battlefields.

Some cultures would argue that deception is the very art of war. And poker!

Either Iran or USA could be deliberately underplaying their hands as we speak. I wouldn't be surprised in the slightest.