Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
back to business
Are you sure that Iran can't lose 5 trillion dollars? Because Iran's oil resources alone is worth 16 trillion dollars alone, if oil stays at $80 per barrel. That's besides Iran's vast natural gas reserves, helium reserves and other mineral resources including copper and lithium.
Yeah, no. Iran has not established such a thing.
No - this is an open forum, and we are free to express our views and explain the rationale when required. I have done that.And we should take your word granted about that?
No, you are not Iranian. Your judgement is being clouded with ignorance instead of anger and hate.
Just like your initial statement that Iran cannot lose 5 trillion dollars.
And your definition of what constitutes a victory over the US is beyond ridiculous.
What gets me thinking they will not invade is why are they bombing bridges and not sending troops immediately? The bridges are right now under repair and will be completely back to service in a few days. Why aren't they bombing the repair teams?
If you intend to cut bridges and routes then invade immediately afterwards instead of giving time to repair them
I see that as opportunity cost. Total control over the strait of Hormuz is worth more than 5 trillion. If Iran can cement its de facto ownership it will pay infinite dividends in shaping behavior of nations worldwide. The sand statelets will fall to Iran sooner or later. Iran theoretically can create a petro rial. The same way that the emirs deposit their earnings in the US, they can shift that to Iran.That's the most ridiculous thing I have read in a while.
So, if Iran loses 5 trillion dollars, loses its entire energy resources to the enemy and turns into an inhabitable wasteland because it can no longer sustain life but sinks 2 tankers in the Strait of Hormuz which has limited effect on the global economy, Iran has won the war. OK! lol
Who said anything about blowing it up? That's a strawman fallacy.The Americans are not going to blow up the very thing they are trying to capture and have influence or control over... All the things you have mentioned are the things the USA and the world wants and needs so why burn it ? Your statement is not logical.
What you think as some random person on the internet has no importance in the war whatsoever. So, if your best argument for that is "I think it is so", then let's agree to disagree.I think they have, you suggest they haven't. Ok.
You are free to express your views and I am free to express mine. What does that have to do with the statement you made?No - this is an open forum, and we are free to express our views and explain the rationale when required. I have done that.
I said you were ignorant, not angry. Read it again. I said you were ignorant about the situation of Iran, as clearly demonstrated by your idea that Iran cannot lose 5 trillion dollars, and you not being Iranian even strengthens my position, not weaken it. So, stop pretending to be an Iran expert when your information is incomplete and mostly wrong.What am I angry about ?!??!! Iran is not my country, I have no linkage or association to it, so why would I be angry and hateful about anything that is happening ????? This is not a logical statement.
No, you just disproved your point and discredited yourself. You demonstrated you did not understand the value of Iran's resources.I have made my point above, Iran cannot lose 5 trillion dollars...
What happened to we are free to express our views?That is ok - you are more than welcome to put me in your ignore list if i trigger you soo much. Please do so![]()
This is a joke, right? So, if Iran loses all of its power plants and bridges, loses Khuzestan and Bushehr which holds 90% of its energy resources, but continues to sink a few tankers in the Strait of Hormuz, Iran has won the war per your definition? lmao
By establishing military bases there? They also have multiple bases around Iran which can be used as well. It's not like the US lacks enough military presence near Khuzestan and Bushehr.
How did the US stay in Deir Ez-Zur in Syria throughout the Syrian Civil War? Assad didn't even bother to kick the US out after they occupied Deir Ez-Zur and took control of Syria's oil fields.
As long as Iran has no air force to move troops, and relies on land routes only, the US threat is very serious. And it is already too late for building an air force.
The math doesn't math, to be honest with you. Even if Iran imposes a toll on the Strait of Hormuz as proposed by the IRGC, our annual income from the Strait of Hormuz will be about $40 billion. It will take 125 years for Iran to make 5 trillion dollars from the Strait of Hormuz.I see that as opportunity cost. Total control over the strait of Hormuz is worth more than 5 trillion. If Iran can cement its de facto ownership it will pay infinite dividends in shaping behavior of nations worldwide. The sand statelets will fall to Iran sooner or later. If I had a say I would push for a petro rial. The same way that the emirs deposit their earnings in the US, they can shift that to Iran.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.