ShapurII
Trusted Member
I agree. But it's possibly the best thing for Iran. We need a closure after 22 years of sanctions. What will happen after then can determine the future of Iran.the next 4 months will change everything
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I agree. But it's possibly the best thing for Iran. We need a closure after 22 years of sanctions. What will happen after then can determine the future of Iran.the next 4 months will change everything
I think we should merge this thread with the existing conflict thread. they are basically the same at this pointI agree. But it's possibly the best thing for Iran. We need a closure after 22 years of sanctions. What will happen after then can determine the future of Iran.
There will be nothing imo even if the talks fail, nothing but usual AngloJew barkingI think we are headed to serious military conflict between Iran and Israel in the next 4 months
It will likely last for several weeks as Israel completes SEAD/DEAD missions to repeatedly bomb Natanz and Fordow
you are welcome to express your views but when you post in the Iranian section you should write Persian GulfIran is closer to the Gulf than Israel. It doesn't have enough weapons to reach Israel. In such a war, unfortunately hot zone will be the Gulf area and Israel will escape unscathed.
If it creates a war situation between Gulf Arabs and Iran, and has them invested in it, that's when Israel will try pushing Palestinians out of Gaza and exert maximum pressure on Egypt to comply.
underestimating them is dangerous and foolishThere will be nothing imo even if the talks fail, nothing but usual AngloJew barking
Israel simply doesn't have the capability to cancel Iran nuclear program, unless assisted by the US at full scale and not only intelligence
When they can't they bark as they always did since 2006
The Arab states will only be targeted if they directly help Israel or the USAIran is closer to the Gulf than Israel. It doesn't have enough weapons to reach Israel. In such a war, unfortunately hot zone will be the Gulf area and Israel will escape unscathed.


I believe Grossi was taken in choppers at night to various deep buried facilities and shown that yous can't do jack shit no?When you tell reformist dumbfucks like Zibakalam mofo, these guys from IAEA and other so called international orgs are only collecting data for Mossad and CIA, they respond with their rear legs.
Look at his words, oh man! Half a mile underground. Damn we cannot target them, they are unreachable.
Khatami gave every detail of our scientists to IAEA terrorists and they leaked the info to western intelligence agencies.
Yemenis breached it twice too...I believe Grossi was taken in choppers at night to various deep buried facilities and shown that yous can't do jack shit no?
The other fact of life is that Iran besides Russia is da only known entity to breach da western ABM shield no? (proven).....
This is what he got told/ shown.....and now he reporting it back to his employers.
Grossi says Iran told him directly that if Israel attacks Iran's nuclear sites Iran will respond by quitting the NPT and developing nuclear weapons.
If the pre-2004 knowledge has been retained and the key experts are still around (which they probably are other than Fakhrizadeh), it should be a formality to test a warhead within a week or so once a sufficient amount of 90% enriched uranium is readyBy "developing" I hope they just need to tighten a screw....
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.