Hack-Hook
INT'L MOD
- Jan 11, 2012
- 21,742
- 18,101
- Country of Origin
- Country of Residence
no its not the case , if any body have the complaint . the complaint can be i don't like the name of Iran representative so the deal must go off.And here lies the caveat, Mr PG! It was the Americans and the E3 who have not been meeting their commitments long before Iran began scaling back its own commitment in response. Iran never stopped complying with the JCPOA until the deal was in effect over when US left. The scenario that you paint would only work if Iran was the first to noncompliance when the other participants where adhereing to the deal. This is why it is not as simple as you paint it.
So please, if you think I'm trolling or whatever, do whatever you want. And please let's see you write your "long book" of three very short paragraphs which are basically saying the same thing.
if the guy don't change his name to one they like they can ask the advanced committee and if he even change it , they can again say we didn't accept it because we still remember the old name and then unsc had to decide the deal must go on or not.
its ridiculous you don't understand the must basic and crucial part of JCPOA and like to talk about the deal and .........................