JF-17 - Updates, News & Discussion

What it has enabled with high performance flight hours is priceless (so to speak). From the carefully rationed F-16 hours to literally being able to “rajj ke urao” is a BIG driver in getting better training and tactics developed from it.

Pity those poor Engg Officers at Flt Lines who have to get the aircrafts ready for flying, recover them, maintain them and get them ready for flying again. All with rather poorly compiled Technical Manuals being improved over time - compared to the masterworks given by the Americans in addition to decades of manpower's practical experience on Vipers.
 
Pity those poor Engg Officers at Flt Lines who have to get the aircrafts ready for flying, recover them, maintain them and get them ready for flying again. All with rather poorly compiled Technical Manuals being improved over time - compared to the masterworks given by the Americans in addition to decades of manpower's practical experience.
Some baggage cannot be removed that easily. You are looking at decades of knowledge in LM versus Chengdu’s F-7 jump to this and then usual “minimal effort” mentality on Pakistan side.

Just not held to a standard - which btw a now “ghar band” F-16 mafia could have enforced in PAF because they carry some of that mentality.
 
What it has enabled with high performance flight hours is priceless (so to speak). From the carefully rationed F-16 hours to literally being able to “rajj ke urao” is a BIG driver in getting better training and tactics developed from it.
Absolutely and conversally, more PAF guys put in various scenarios, load-out configurations, and electronic environment etc. more they came up with new use cases in each role plus identifying any potential room for upgrades. (Hence contirbuting towards development of PFX).
 
Happy Birthday JF-17.
What an incredible journey, right from the start.

I remember, following the news of its first flight on various defense forums and the constant whining of our neighbors on how this is just a mig-21 clone and it will never go in production because Russia will never release RD-93 for it. How time flies !!!!!
 
i still remember actual first flight of PT-01 in july 2003 with smoking engine gears down.

what an achievement by Pakistan-China Joint effort!

Masha Allah how far we have come! Truly humbling!

Me too!! I was earlier trying to find a fan made promo video of the FC1 test flights that had the "The Rasmus" as the background music, but youtube is playing slow on that right now.

Yep. still remember. Everyone was so happy in oldest PDF, pakistanidefenseforum.com

There was another video which I vividly remember, the animation of JF-17s. Where SU-30s attack a Pakistani airbase. The F-16s on CAP try to intercept but they lacked BVR so they just evade. Then JF-17 comes out of the hangar and takes off and enages SU-30s. There was an exchange of BVR missiles. In the end many SU-30s were shot down, the last one fires an air to ground missiles towards control tower. A F-7 sacrifices itself coming in between the missile and the tower. The video was made by the member named Londo Molari.
 
Imagine when the WS-19 engine tech matures and the JF-17 has a better TWR than the F-16.

It would make it more agile and speedy for sure. But the airframe limitations will still make it a light attack jet. But it will pack a great punch like it's always has.

There is a Fizaya housing society I passed by Yesterday, they used to have an F-7 parked as a souvenir. It's been replaced by a JF-17, with 4 BVR loadout, under each wing 1 SD-10 and 1 PL-15 with wingtips showing PL-9. It's serial said 25-204 I think. It surprised me and then I realized it was just a mocked model. Next time I pass by there, I'll take a pic and post here. The serial shocked me from distance but later I realized it was a full scale model.
 
Last edited:
Me too!! I was earlier trying to find a fan made promo video of the FC1 test flights that had the "The Rasmus" as the background music, but youtube is playing slow on that right now.
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
It would make it more agile and speedy for sure. But the airframe limitations will still make it a light attack jet. But it will pack a great punch like it's always has.

There is a Fizaya housing society I passed by Yesterday, they used to have an F-7 parked as a souvenir. It's been replaced by a JF-17, with 4 BVR loadout, under each wing 1 SD-10 and 1 PL-15 with wingtips showing PL-9. It's serial said 25-204 I think. It surprised me and then I realized it was just a mocked model. Next time I pass by there, I'll take a pic and post here. The serial shocked me from distance but later I realized it was a full scale model.
The airframe limitations will spur on PAC to push forward a new design (PFX) that can handle and utilize to it maximum, the capabilities of the engine. As the earliest JF-17 airframes move beyond their useful life, replacement with the PFX, powered by an export approved derivative or licensed production of the WS-19 could really fill a role of not only manned but an adequately sized unmanned platform. With a more powerful engine, that allows the jet to super-cruise, and possibly have generally better fuel economy, a dispersal plan could also not need to account as as much fuel to be on hand to refuel jets, in the fuel consuming task of multiple takeoffs a day.
 
Last edited:
Yep. still remember. Everyone was so happy in oldest PDF, pakistanidefenseforum.com

There was another video which I vividly remember, the animation of JF-17s. Where SU-30s attack a Pakistani airbase. The F-16s on CAP try to intercept but they lacked BVR so they just evade. Then JF-17 comes out of the hangar and takes off and enages SU-30s. There was an exchange of BVR missiles. In the end many SU-30s were shot down, the last one fires an air to ground missiles towards control tower. A F-7 sacrifices itself coming in between the missile and the tower. The video was made by the member named Londo Molari.
;) Found an unauthorized version of Londo’s video. Still good to see it for old times sake.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
The airframe limitations will spur on PAC to push forward a new design (PFX) that can handle and utilize to it maximum, the capabilities of the engine. As the earliest JF-17 airframes move beyond their useful life, replacement with the PFX, powered by an export approved derivative or licensed production of the WS-19 could really fill a role of not only manned but an adequately sized unmanned platform. With a more powerful engine, that allows the jet to super-cruise, and possibly have generally better fuel economy, a dispersal plan could also not need to account as as much fuel to be on hand to refuel jets, in the fuel consuming task of multiple takeoffs a day.

If I was running the PFX program, I would ask the Chinese to give us a 5th gen design as PFX. For example, on this forum, there is a thread comparing the J-50 to Flanker series. It seems as they turned the flanker design into full stealth and added internal bays in a stealthy design. We are lucky to have the world's top R&D connected with us as "Iron Brothers" so we should use their expertise for faster production of weapons and grow our internal talent.

If a PFX single engine 5th gen design is taken from the Chinese, they would run super computing based simulation testing and any defects can be identified through the super computing testing environment and design fixed quickly and re-tested. Once simulations are run without issues, they will go straight to wind tunnel tests and finalize that design. They will also tell us how to re-program the JF-17 assembly line to produce this new PFX design when we are ready.

Engine issues will iron out automatically. China is very near in finalizing mass production of a few jet engines soon.
 
If I was running the PFX program, I would ask the Chinese to give us a 5th gen design as PFX. For example, on this forum, there is a thread comparing the J-50 to Flanker series. It seems as they turned the flanker design into full stealth and added internal bays in a stealthy design. We are lucky to have the world's top R&D connected with us as "Iron Brothers" so we should use their expertise for faster production of weapons and grow our internal talent.

If a PFX single engine 5th gen design is taken from the Chinese, they would run super computing based simulation testing and any defects can be identified through the super computing testing environment and design fixed quickly and re-tested. Once simulations are run without issues, they will go straight to wind tunnel tests and finalize that design. They will also tell us how to re-program the JF-17 assembly line to produce this new PFX design when we are ready.

Engine issues will iron out automatically. China is very near in finalizing mass production of a few jet engines soon.
I’ll give you the design now; it’s the McDonnell Douglas JAST design. A fully worked out design. Sure it has to be scaled down for the smaller diameter and length engine, but it’s a very modern design; it even has a “Pelikan tail”.

IMHO, it’s not about having a design as much as waiting on the engine to mature and our own facilities to catch up in production capabilities and financing. If we work on fully training our engineers to learn how to do all the work as independently as possible, have the facilities to make the planes and finally have the financing to fund a run of over a 100 planes, this jet could be ready in a decade and replacing older JF-17 by 2035-2040.

1756211335825.jpeg

This model is on display at the western museum of flight in Torrance, CA, on the wall, next to the YF-23 model.
IMG_9029.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Me too!! I was earlier trying to find a fan made promo video of the FC1 test flights that had the "The Rasmus" as the background music, but youtube is playing slow on that right now.
A Chinese documentary on the JF-17's maiden flight.


Imagine when the WS-19 engine tech matures and the JF-17 has a better TWR than the F-16.
This...
You can imagine it, but don't expect it to become a reality. At least, not for a very, very long time.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Back
Top