New Power Plant for JF-17 Thunder - News, Updates & Discussions

Status
Not open for further replies.
JF thunder never used on feb 19th brah……Khuda na karay JF thunder ever gets used in anger, cuz it’s not a good thing for us brah.

And I no poodle either. Irani's totally know what to do militarily……why can’t we figure it out?

The day we start doing what these irani’s are doing, all on their own……I will believe we’ve made it.

PS the proof of dat goin be when we take back our Kashmir from dem Indians…….not because of religion, but because of our culture.

Buss!

You must be smoking really strong one.


Isn’t the reference CCTV? The design may not be exactly what is shown, but why announce a “J-31B” if it’s not a real project.


Agreed to the extent that there might be J-31B - an improved version, but I still say that pic needs to be ignored.
 
You must be smoking really strong one.





Agreed to the extent that there might be J-31B - an improved version, but I still say that pic needs to be ignored.
So you doubt side bays have been added? I agree that without moving the wheels outward to the wings, as on the Gripen E, there won’t be enough space where side bays could go, and a slight lengthening of the airframe . But it’s a realistic improvement, don’t you agree?

I think it comes down the engine. If we see an engine with a max thrust of 120 kn, it becomes more likely.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: HRK
So you doubt side bays have been added? I agree that without moving the wheels outward to the wings, as on the Gripen E, there won’t be enough space where side bays could go. But it’s a realistic improvement, don’t you agree?

No I am not saying about side bays or any other improvement.

Improvement with time is logical thing and it must be there, whether it's side bays or any other improvement.

I am just saying don't extract any info from that particular pic. It will mislead.
 
I saw a video on Youtube of a Pakistani indigenous engine. Anyone seen it? It's remarkable.
 
That's definitely not true. I used to be an ebay trader, and you can't find fighter aircraft engines there.
 
That's a different class of engine. This is a smaller engine.
 
Last edited:
Guys! Are you serious!??

There is hobby engineering team developing a small engine - not for civil airliners and surely not for a high-end fighter aircraft - out of the box in a garage and you are celebrating "we have a new engine for the Thunder"!????

Get mature and think before believing any YouTube-nonsense.
 
Guys! Are you serious!??

There is hobby engineering team developing a small engine - not for civil airliners and surely not for a high-end fighter aircraft - out of the box in a garage and you are celebrating "we have a new engine for the Thunder"!????

Get mature and think before believing any YouTube-nonsense.
Unfortunately, these individuals are not intentionally ignorant; they are simply misinformed, mostly relying on clickbaity YouTube videos for information. They tend to share what they've learned or recently heard as if it's news, despite lacking a technical or engineering background. The best course of action is to ignore them. While they may be spamming these threads, calling them out is unlikely to deter them and will only contribute to the clutter.
Good day!
 
Guys! Are you serious!??

There is hobby engineering team developing a small engine - not for civil airliners and surely not for a high-end fighter aircraft - out of the box in a garage and you are celebrating "we have a new engine for the Thunder"!????

Get mature and think before believing any YouTube-nonsense.

lets make an engine in garage, its quite a daunting task.. lets admire her what she did, but i get your point. her passion can be used to do a lot.
 
For sure, but such an engine - and that‘s just obvious - is never in the class of a military engine for the JF-17.

could be used to mass produce loitering kamakazi drones enmass like iran has done
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top