Operation Ghazab Lil Haq (Pakistan - Afghanistan War)

hasssanali8998 said:
he said nothing wrong , this is not a poltical statment , exaclty what i want to hear from goverment , that lives of pakistanis is above everyone
let them bark


and yes this the one thing we can learn from israelis , how much they care about the lives of their soldeirs and country men , like recently they raided a village in lebanon to search for the body of a IAF WSO that died in 1980s
Click to expand...
A disproportionate response is against the UN laws. You cannot execute killer + some more and back it up. Yes, no one will raise a voice for Afghans, but these things will be a sore point in negotiations. Also, ISPR statements are not for public appeasement but meant for a tangible policy.
A better statement could be that "We deserve the right to take out perpetrators who are responsible for the killing of innocent civilians in mosques and civilian places. What TTP has done is against international law, Islam and Pakthoon own values"

Can we kill 50 k for 500 losses (inhumane)? Can he materialise that (capacity issue and thus raises non-seriousness)? Can he squeeze air for india if it blocks our water (which india is doing)?
Therefore, he should give just policy statements and no political rhetoric.
 
It is just pathetic to hear these sort of news that there are still vast quantities of weapons deports still intact in A-Stan.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Goenitz said:
A disproportionate response is against the UN laws. You cannot execute killer + some more and back it up. Yes, no one will raise a voice for Afghans, but these things will be a sore point in negotiations. Also, ISPR statements are not for public appeasement but meant for a tangible policy.
A better statement could be that "We deserve the right to take out perpetrators who are responsible for the killing of innocent civilians in mosques and civilian places. What TTP has done is against international law, Islam and Pakthoon own values"

Can we kill 50 k for 500 losses (inhumane)? Can he materialise that (capacity issue and thus raises non-seriousness)? Can he squeeze air for india if it blocks our water (which india is doing)?
Therefore, he should give just policy statements and no political rhetoric.
Click to expand...
Why in the world would you name an ethnicity when discussing the TTP at an international statement? Literally the worst thing you could ever do.

Also, as long as you are not hitting civilian targets, your response can be whatever you deem it to be.

I don't know why you're treating UN laws like they are some gospel to live by anyway, calm down, its made by some foreigners at a table. Putting yourself in imaginary chains at their whims is nothing less than mental slavery.
 
1773881746189.jpeg
and this will work
i have spent past two day fighting pakistanis and yookaystanis on twitter/insta that we did not kill 400 civilians .
be prepared for this warfare .
 
Following a white man's UN rulebook on how to fight wars like it's a respectful game of ping pong is not gonna get you anywhere against a tribal group that thinks suicide bombings, beheadings, and killing civilians is a source of pride and relishing in it.

I'm sorry to say but some suggestions being given here are so out of touch with actual ground reality and how deterrence really works that it just sounds hilariously clownish at best, or cowardice at the worst.

This does not in any way mean you need to go on a civilian killing rampage, far from it, but talking about 1 hit for 1 proportionality like it is ping pong is insane. You play according to what realistically works on the ground based on the enemy's psychology, that's the whole point of cost imposition.
 
Hopefully Pessimistic said:
Following a white man's UN rulebook on how to fight wars like it's a respectful game of ping pong is not gonna get you anywhere against a tribal group that thinks suicide bombings, beheadings, and killing civilians is a source of pride and relishing in it.

I'm sorry to say but some suggestions being given here are so out of touch with actual ground reality and how deterrence really works that it just sounds hilariously clownish at best, or cowardice at the worst.

This does not in any way mean you need to go on a civilian killing rampage, far from it, but talking about 1 hit for 1 proportionality like it is ping pong is insane. You play according to what realistically works on the ground based on the enemy's psychology, that's the whole point of cost imposition.
Click to expand...
1773882172419.png
this should be pinned on this thread
 
hasssanali8998 said:
View attachment 186726
this should be pinned on this thread
Click to expand...
Sorry mate can't do that, white papa's rulebook said not allowed ❌️

We will just kill 1 Taliban for 1 of ours, I am super duper sure that this is the greatest strategy on Earth and the greatest deterrence ever. War will be over in a day. It will also make negotiations super easy I heard, we killed 1 taliban that's amazing leverage 😍
 
hasssanali8998 said:
View attachment 186725
and this will work
i have spent past two day fighting pakistanis and yookaystanis on twitter/insta that we did not kill 400 civilians .
be prepared for this warfare .
Click to expand...
This was the strategy of Vlad the Impaler against the ottomans. He was the Ruler of a relatively small Kingdom called Wallachia in modern day Romania, around 1440s. AD.

He knew he cant fight the much larger and powerful Ottomans. So he used guerilla warfare, where his soldiers would hide in forests, capture Ottoman soldiers, mutilate and torture them, and then leave them as a display piece for other Ottomon soldiers to find and watch. To strike fear in them.
He also had specialist propaganda people who would go and spread rumors about him, that Vlad drinks human blood and such. He was nick named Dracula.

A much advanced and similar tactics was devised and used by the old man of the mountains, north of Tehran in the Alborz mountains.
Hasan Ibn e Sabah. The cult leader of Hashishain or in English Assassins.
He developed very advanced techniques of brainwashing young gullible men, after drugging them with Hashish, hence the name Hashishain. Then send them on suicide missions.
I recommend reading about him and you will find an exact match with what TTP, TTA had been doing over the last many decades.
 
Something along the lines of this should be the offfical statement given to international media explaining the conflict:

Afghanistan after a long period of civil wars and instability finally has a chance to choose peace and development for its own people, instead of war and aggression.

Unfortunately, the Taliban regime is once again adopting the age-old dangerous policies of previous rulers of aggression and illegal expansionism towards Pakistan. One major way being through the active sustainment of terrorist proxy groups such as the TTP & BLA.

Pakistan will not allow any harm to its civilians to come from the Taliban regime & its supporters, and it reserves the right to defend itself.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 14 (members: 0, guests: 14)

Pakistan Defence Latest

Country Watch Latest

Latest Posts

Share this page

Back
Top