No major installation was successfully hit by Pakistan. All the blast and smoke was from initial impact of the weapons fired by Pakistan.
Similar smoke and blast effects were seen at Sargodha where the runway was struck successfully by the IAF. Runway has nothing to catch fire and cause smoke but there was both of them in ample quantity. Only Nur Khan had fire raging for many hours but rest all were targets with nothing to cause secondary blast and fire, which were captured from ground.
So a Fatah falling in an open area or even a non critical building is not a successful strike. Damage to buildings could have been proven the very next day which wasn’t done. And please don’t say that Paksiatn doesn’t have its own BDA. There are more than enough entities that can provide satellite pictures for money. I am sure that, this was done but not publicised due to obvious reasons.
A bomb or a missile dropping inside an airbase isn’t a successful strike. Its accuracy to strike something critical makes it successful. Either the weapons fired didn’t have the desired accuracy or the most critical one’s were intercepted by Indian AD.
Considering that PAF fired more ordnance in two days than that fired in entire 1965 war means a lot. Considering that there is nothing to show as proof means a lot.
It’s high time Think Tank level of posters start accepting this fact and stop relying on videos made on ground as a proof.