Pakistan-Af: Operation Khyber Storm

Status
Not open for further replies.
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Its okay showing a public display and handshake - the problem is when you are dealing with a race lacking in basic intellect and trust - one has to be careful. They have active cells in Pakistan assimilated and ready to explode themselves up - creating havoc - thinking they are getting blessed for acts of terror.
I find trust a difficult word to use when talking about Afghanistan
 
In my view, having listened to everyone’s opinions both here and elsewhere, this was meant to be a regime change operation. It’s highly likely that Trump was promised Bagram Airbase and access to Afghanistan’s rare minerals. Unfortunately for the planners, things didn’t go as planned and the Taliban survived.

Most probably, Turkey convinced both parties to step back and not take this any further. Now we can expect things to go back to normal. The Taliban may make some effort to get rid of any TTP/BLA operating in their country. Or let Pakistan do it. In return, Pakistan will allow trade as before. So, looks like we’re going to go back to the status quo.

People hoping for capturing Afghan territory or killing large numbers of people may be disappointed. I’m hoping that Trump doesn’t do to Sharif what he did to Modi once he finds out he isn’t getting the goodies he was promised.

Buddy if it was a regime change operation, the. Kabul and Kandahar would be bombed VERY heavily

And they would be bombed by the airforce, not drones and our main military would be heavily involved in the conflict, not just the F.C

What we have in our country is easily led jahils who buys any and every conspiracy theory
 
Wait guys, pakistan knows afghan instance, if it wont last more strikes and operations will be done.

I dont see pak giving the captured area soon. If they give they can do ops again.

Overall it was tactical victory.

2025 is pakistans year in conflicts. Winning.

Yes,

Pakistan means business. The world respects those who mean business and it shows.
In my view, having listened to everyone’s opinions both here and elsewhere, this was meant to be a regime change operation. It’s highly likely that Trump was promised Bagram Airbase and access to Afghanistan’s rare minerals. Unfortunately for the planners, things didn’t go as planned and the Taliban survived.

Most probably, Turkey convinced both parties to step back and not take this any further. Now we can expect things to go back to normal. The Taliban may make some effort to get rid of any TTP/BLA operating in their country. Or let Pakistan do it. In return, Pakistan will allow trade as before. So, looks like we’re going to go back to the status quo.

People hoping for capturing Afghan territory or killing large numbers of people may be disappointed. I’m hoping that Trump doesn’t do to Sharif what he did to Modi once he finds out he isn’t getting the goodies he was promised.

1D analysis in a 4D world.
 
TURKEY must be included on Pakistan's request to reinforce guaranters....if it is the case, Saudia could also be there as our defence partner .....
 
A history of our Tribal belt.
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

These journalist think they know everything. In the end all they do is go with flow. I dont like them at all.

I remember hamid mir who hated army once now he is different, that guy living in usa with beard maybe shujat was his name once was pak army pro.

Truth is never going to be revealed to public.

History of tribal is not something I wanna learn from these journalists.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Balkanization of Afghanistan will ensure no safe haven for afghan terrorists in any country. BTW this is the map of pashtun majority areas of Afghanistan.

The green is still pashtun minority despite centuries of migration. Imagine in near future you have both Khorasan and Pakistan pounding talibunds terrorists. With no border with anyone else they will quickly come to senses and pashtunistan will merge with Pakistan as 5th province named Afghania.

View attachment 154865

What is the value of so many illterates joining Pakistan, to Pakistan ?
 
In my view, having listened to everyone’s opinions both here and elsewhere, this was meant to be a regime change operation. It’s highly likely that Trump was promised Bagram Airbase and access to Afghanistan’s rare minerals. Unfortunately for the planners, things didn’t go as planned and the Taliban survived.

Most probably, Turkey convinced both parties to step back and not take this any further. Now we can expect things to go back to normal. The Taliban may make some effort to get rid of any TTP/BLA operating in their country. Or let Pakistan do it. In return, Pakistan will allow trade as before. So, looks like we’re going to go back to the status quo.

People hoping for capturing Afghan territory or killing large numbers of people may be disappointed. I’m hoping that Trump doesn’t do to Sharif what he did to Modi once he finds out he isn’t getting the goodies he was promised.
TTA doesn't want to take any action against TTP and will create issue with Pakistan when PAF goes TTP and BLA hunting inside Afghanistan. Turkey couldn't convince anyone, it was global pressure by different countries on both Pakistan and Afghanistan to sit down and talk. So both complied and shook hands.

USA can come into picture when TTA is ready (forced to) to make a deal with USA regarding the Bagram AFB. Till then TTA and India are backing each other against Pakistan. TTA wanted India backing so when Pakistan comes hard on Afghanistan, Pakistan should keep in mind about an imminent Indian attack on eastern border. Similarly, when Ops Sindoor Part II is conducted whenever India gets an opportunity, Pakistan shouldn't be able to take off its eyes away from Afghanistan.

If TTA weren't a bunch of nuts, they would have cooperated with Pakistan to eliminate TTP and BLA, and then cooperated with USA to eliminate IS and AQ from their country. This way TTA would have control all over Afghanistan and then foreign companies from China, Europe, Americas etc could come in for mining, mineral/gas extraction, and gas pipelines etc. Since none of this seems possible now, so Pakistan and other stakeholders will try to remove TTA or change leadership.
 
Last edited:
Its okay showing a public display and handshake - the problem is when you are dealing with a race lacking in basic intellect and trust - one has to be careful. They have active cells in Pakistan assimilated and ready to explode themselves up - creating havoc - thinking they are getting blessed for acts of terror.
I find trust a difficult word to use when talking about Afghanistan
Wow, so did they publically agreed they will get rid of ttp and accept Pakistan unconditionally territorial integrity

Or was it bull crap diplomatic language?🤔
 
Pointless.

They do not recognize the very existence of Pakistan, thus to them these agreements are simply a way stave off pressure until they believe they're powerful enough to invade Pakistan. In their minds, these agreements are invalid.
So agreement did say they will not interfere with Pakistan terrotiral integrity or support or let any foreign actors

I guess not, i meanwe all know sway qatar has
 
Bhai in this sense India Pakistan border should be called "Radcliffe Line" ..... ??? We call it Radcliffe Line ....??? No because it is an international border.

Issue is Afghan always call Pak-Afghan border as Durand Line and some "Loy bar brigade" in Pakistan also term it as Durand Line.

We need to understand the term "Line" in international law have lower sanctity then International Border and "could be subjected to the final settlement".

Hope I have clear my point.

Regarding your second point just because of perceived intentions of your enemy one could not initiate any preemptively aggression.

Recent attack of Israel on Iran is the classic example in relation to you point of preemptive aggression one could look for and I don't need to explain it was wrong on what grounds.
I think any sort of engagement with any group in OFFICAL terms shouldn't be conducted unless they accept your international boarder

If india stops doing it to punjab you will call it war, yet we gave all favours to Afghanistan for doing so
This part boggles my mind. I thought it was because tta is our own group and they have internal pressure but seems its not, but miscalculation
 
  • Like
Reactions: HRK
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top