Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Superhornet flown by 2 aircrew so that's 2 ejections. And the Finnish Air Force had a F-18D crash with 2 safe ejections.




Any SOW is a good SOW as far as the PAF's concerned. It's data-link-only config might be stressed against Indian EW jamming though, but that's assuming that EW is dense. So, I can see that in less covered areas, H-4 could still be very viable.@Quwa I need your expert insight please.
Is the H4 standoff still a viable strike package or is it now taking a back seat?
thanks.
From what I have observed,Long range SOWs like Subsonic cruise missiles can't replace the traditional bombing runs.Any SOW is a good SOW as far as the PAF's concerned. It's data-link-only config might be stressed against Indian EW jamming though, but that's assuming that EW is dense. So, I can see that in less covered areas, H-4 could still be very viable.
However, if we're talking 3-5 years from now, then H-4 will take a back seat and more autonomous SOWs (e.g., Rasoob 250, AZB-81LR, etc) will be critical.
tbh...even ahead of stealth NGFAs, both sides will likely pursue fast-jet UCAVs.From what I have observed,Long range SOWs like Subsonic cruise missiles can't replace the traditional bombing runs.
The number of munitions required in long battle is simply too much.No one can produce cruise Missiles in enough numbers.B/c these cruise things are too expensive.
While 4th Gen Fighters can't stand alone in today's battle space.We are ill equiped for offensive operations and so is India.
It took India almost 70 aircraft for them to carry out an offensive operation.
Both Need 5th Gen Fighters Urgently I think it's just Time India will go for F35.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.