yep really stupid , pointed it out when they tested it .
still dont get it
rail tracks/roads are the first things that will be taken out in a war , you already have long range missiles why not just go the iran route
Typically, when any nation engages in a show of force, it will display either the missile itself or its launch platform. In reality, however, launching a ballistic missile requires the support of a vast, complex infrastructure—far more than just a standalone launch platform or the missile itself.
In the case of road-mobile ballistic missile TEL (Transporter-Erector-Launcher) systems, we typically see only the TEL vehicle itself. Yet, behind it lies a massive convoy providing comprehensive support.
Rail-mobile ballistic missile launch systems essentially integrate this entire, extensive support infrastructure onto a single train.
It is worth noting that the TEL systems of most nations are, in practice, capable only of launching from pre-designated sites; they cannot execute a launch at any time or from any random point along a roadway. These pre-designated sites are prepared in advance during their construction phase, complete with the pre-installation of necessary pipelines and cabling.
I think we have enough knowledge on how to dig up tunnels , mostly modern miltary tunnels are built by traditional destructive methods instead of the more expensive TBMs..
1. Military-grade underground engineering systems are extremely complex. This constitutes a highly specialized, independent discipline—one that is far more intricate and challenging than you might imagine.
2. In terms of both economic cost and operational efficiency, Tunnel Boring Machines (TBMs) offer a significantly higher cost-effectiveness ratio compared to manual excavation.