Hassan007
Registered Member
Don't want derail this thread with political BS but we all know, if that was the case endia would have crossed the border and thrashed us.@Hassan007 You can give "thumbs down", reality does not change.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Don't want derail this thread with political BS but we all know, if that was the case endia would have crossed the border and thrashed us.@Hassan007 You can give "thumbs down", reality does not change.
These slow explosions are more destructive than those high speed explosives.
For example RDX explodes at speed of Mach 10 and mach 20 , in between.
Thats the speed of the chemical reaction inside the explosive .
So a missile hitting the target at mach 2, will have nearly 20% of its explosive power becoming directional .
And most of the destruction will be in the direction of missiles motion. More like a shaped charge .
Thats no good when trying to destroy buildings
Here is a picture of Brahmos strike on PAF hanger .
View attachment 196210
Its posted by Indians , so I can't guarantee authenticity.
But look at the strewn field., and the damage .
Its very directional
The missile impacts at a shallow angle, travelling at 2 o clock direction.
The damage is mostly towards the road and debris can be seen all the way across the road, and damage to the right hand side of the building. Again correlating with the direction of the motion of the missile.
And that's a problem with supersonic missiles.
Try the same building with a subsonic missile, and an air fuel mixture munitions, or any . The explosion will have all around effects, not in just one direction.

Ok even if it could stop top attack ATGMS it comes at a massive cost, its essentially been turned into a ww1 era landship with a turret that can't turn, it's sight has been massively hindered completely destroying it's situational awareness and also means the crew can't easily escape in the event of a hit.Not if the tank is using hedgehog armour.
Yow make a better cat and someone will make a better mouse .
View attachment 196243
Fatah is synonymous to Hatf series for conventional role.tbh my biggest critique here is the naming convention.
They've literally split Fatah into 4 distinct missile types: GMLRS, SSM BM, GLCM, and now SSCM. I get that they want Fatah to be ARFC's thing now, but I seriously don't think this was the plan -- the original Fatah-II was an extended-range Fatah-I.
At the rate they're going, they might start calling Shahed-style LMs "Fatah Munna" and stuff.
They need to split off the names across the different families.
That's probably a reference to the Tipu artillery shell.What the hell is the long range precision munition. Ive heard no mention of it before.
This is what a single Iskander with a thermoberic warhead did to a multi story concrete building in Kiev.
View attachment 196244
Burning at 2500-3500, its just melts through steel. One of them dropped among Indian airbase, the sheer temperature generated will be enough to fk up a lot of assets.
Pakistan really needs to up its game when it comes to conventional warheads. We have array of delivery systems but warheads remain a big question mark.
The Hatf series have different names atleast, ghauri abdali etc so you can tell that they are distinct missiles.Fatah is synonymous to Hatf series for conventional role.
I think original Abdali (Hatf 2) is probably long decommissioned now.To make the naming mindfuck worse they also named the nuclear version of F2 abdali
So you have Fatah 2, Fatah 2, Abdali and Abdali all different missiles BTW
On the plus side, indians must be spinning too so its a good thingTo make the naming mindfuck worse they also named the nuclear version of F2 abdali
So you have Fatah 2, Fatah 2, Abdali and Abdali all different missiles BTW
Fatah SSM
Fatah-A A mean air Launch ?
Fatah-S S mean ship launch or anti ship?

We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.