PTI freedom movement against Judiciary and Establishment: News, Discussion & Updates

Status
Not open for further replies.
Pakistan is not the only country that suffers from the imbalance of power projected by super powers. It however. Is one of the few countries that has absolutely bent over backwards for superpowers compared to others.

There were plenty of options during WOT and if you think it was truly as binary as with us or against us that is your lack of understanding geopolitics, but don’t project that on Imran Khan or his supporters.

Nations aren’t built like this.
Pakistan has actually balanced its global relations with most countries quite well, in one sentence you try to imply Pakistan is "bending over for the US" but that clearly makes little sense when it is one of the strongest allies of China historically and consistently, the US' biggest peer competitor. That is just one example.

You seem deeply insecure with your inconsequential imagery issues and have very little tangible political points to make. It sounds like very personal issues being expressed here.

There is a time to pretend to be a macho-man brave warrior sar larp, then there is a time to be balanced between as many parties as possible. Those who don't understand this fall even harder than they rise as history has taught us.

Also your constant reference to the WoT is getting lazy now, that is something everyone in Pakistan regrets across party lines, and secondly that was a very unique point in politics where a major terrorist attack happened in the US and they were very much out for blood. There were very little options for a politically cornered Pakistan to play macho man to begin with.
 
Poorly generated AI articles cannot erase what is true.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Two cult bases that are the darlings of Jews, one of course has a family of Zionist Jews.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Some have state-to-state diplomatic relations, others have blood relations and willingly hire Zionists to be puppets.

It's clear which is which outside of the cult's echo-chamber 😂
 
Quoting that actually proves the exact point rather than refuting it. You can dress it up in the polite PR language of human rights, but when you go to an international forum and explicitly argue that Pakistan is violating its "binding commitments under the GSP+ framework," the only functional outcome you are asking for is the suspension of that trade status.

Exactly. This is how to lie and "rest my case" without really lying.

Continued GSP+ status requires adherence to 27 international conventions related to human rights, labor rights, environmental protection, and good governance. Further, the European Union actively monitors compliance with these principles. If a country fails to meet these obligations, it risks losing its GSP+ benefits.

By highlighting IK's treatment as a violation of human rights, the intent is absolutely to get the GSP+ status revoked and thus inflict economic damage to Pakistan.

The cult of IK is blinded to anything else except their dear leader's backside. Clearly.
 
The Iranian embassy in Islamabad has debunked fake news that was being spread by Afghan and PTI political handles. How embarassing.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
The current Pakistani administration's global diplomacy is paying off and leverage being used to end the aggression against Iran.

Action over cheap speeches for illiterate cultists.

Another propaganda attempt by PTI miserably failed. Crying in Europe like the Pahlavi diaspora and then denying it when exposed will only bring you shame!

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
If this takes place, it would be an extremely welcomed move for Iran and the greater region.

Actual tangible achievements being shown are always better than toothless speeches targeted towards an illiterate fanbase.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Exactly. This is how to lie and "rest my case" without really lying.

Continued GSP+ status requires adherence to 27 international conventions related to human rights, labor rights, environmental protection, and good governance. Further, the European Union actively monitors compliance with these principles. If a country fails to meet these obligations, it risks losing its GSP+ benefits.

By highlighting IK's treatment as a violation of human rights, the intent is absolutely to get the GSP+ status revoked and thus inflict economic damage to Pakistan.

The cult of IK is blinded to anything else except their dear leader's backside. Clearly.

Here's an interesting fact.

Who do you think gave testimony in favour of Hyrbyair Marri, in 2009 when he was facing terrorism charges in the UK?

"Historical records confirm Imran Khan testified as a defence witness for Marri and co-accused Faiz Baloch, arguing their alleged actions constituted legitimate resistance against Pakistan's military operations in Balochistan under then-president Musharraf."

At the same time he was providing political space for taliban and protesting against drone strikes on them and their piece of shit families hiding in NWFP.

What was Khan's main gambit?

Flood the country with afghans threatening to blow everything up and blackmail the state for power.

What are the chances he gets gifted a wife by Epstein and he follows up with this conduct?

It's time to call a spade a spade.

We get the usual human rights, sanction Pakistan nonsense from his supporters.

No human rights for all those poor Punjabi laborers offloaded and shot in the face by BLA?

No human rights for all the people massacred by taliban suicide bombers?
 
Here's an interesting fact.

Who do you think gave testimony in favour of Hyrbyair Marri, in 2009 when he was facing terrorism charges in the UK?

"Historical records confirm Imran Khan testified as a defence witness for Marri and co-accused Faiz Baloch, arguing their alleged actions constituted legitimate resistance against Pakistan's military operations in Balochistan under then-president Musharraf."

At the same time he was providing political space for taliban and protesting against drone strikes on them and their piece of shit families hiding in NWFP.

What was Khan's main gambit?

Flood the country with afghans threatening to blow everything up and blackmail the state for power.

What are the chances he gets gifted a wife by Epstein and he follows up with this conduct?

It's time to call a spade a spade.

We get the usual human rights, sanction Pakistan nonsense from his supporters.

No human rights for all those poor Punjabi laborers offloaded and shot in the face by BLA?

No human rights for all the people massacred by taliban suicide bombers?
I am glad I left the echo-chamber I once surrounded myself with around his cult.

At one point I used to defend him until I did my own research and realised all he does is optics and fancy speeches, he is an idiot through and through beyond that. And his cringey illiterate fans don't even like him for his politics they like him for childish reasons like aesthetics.

The current admin is doing very well despite attempts by his fanbase to sabotage it in nearly EVERY step.
 
It's time to call a spade a spade.

The time to call a spade a spade is ALL the time.

Why did the military push forward such a person to be PM? Clearly IK was not suited to the role he was given. These are now the consequences of such poor decision making.

As they say, the dildo of consequences does not forget or forgive.
 
The time to call a spade a spade is ALL the time.

Why did the military push forward such a person to be PM? Clearly IK was not suited to the role he was given. These are now the consequences of such poor decision making.

As they say, the dildo of consequences does not forget or forgive.

I believe they decided to give a short tenure with a limited remit to satisfy his followers so they can't say he was kept out of power.

In turn the establishment used him to ensure a smooth withdrawal of NATO forces from Afghanistan considering his fondness for his taliban buddies and then promptly thrown into the dustbin.
 
Another humiliating embarassment for PTI. They never learn, they've gotten used to being clowns at this point.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
I believe they decided to give a short tenure with a limited remit to satisfy his followers so they can't say he was kept out of power.

I belteve this is NOT their effing job to decide who gets tenure and for how long. That remains the basic problem.

Having said rhat, there can be no sudden transition back to civilian supremacy according to the Constitution. This must be a slow and gradual process without disrupting national unity.

The chances of that happening remain slim to none, however.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Country Watch Latest

Back
Top