Rationale
Registered Member
That is over simplistic to the point of being stupid. It is like saying that a mouse and elephant are the same because they are both ANIMALS.Don't think the readers are plain stupid. Your issues with China and Pakistan are the same. You change the intensity based on your own needs. Just like you did with the West, ate their trillions and didn't even say thank you, forget about being an ally.
1) You have a LAND dispute with both Pakistan and China. It's the same issue......"LAND". However, due to your internal benefits and concerns, you over-hype one (Pakistan) and under-hype the other (China).
2) You can't militarily fight with China. Your OWN military's assessment is, a full conventional war with China will cut ALL SEVEN states at the Chicken's neck and the war will last maximum 7 days ONLY!! So why mess with the Dragon who will swallow a decent portion of your country without a burp?
3) China: you need for your own growth and trade. Its the world's largest trade machine right at your borders, connected with roads and it saves billions in shipping and other cost that you would pay if let's say you were trading with Africa or Europe in this capacity. This is strategic for India and for Indians to have cheaper cost of goods sourced from China.
With Pakistan, until May 2025, Modi and the likes in RSS, really thought they had such an overwhelming military power that they could crush. To look like a big power ready, May 2025 was done. The result not only created earth quakes in Indian political and military elite, it ruined your entire reputation in front of the entire globe. The world does NOT see South Asia belonging to India only. It is now SHARED with Pakistan.
So these are the reasons why a LAND issue is treated differently with China and Pakistan.
Until the British drew up the McMahon Line, most of the territory disputed with China was never under the rule of a power ruling in what is the modern Indian heartland. The people living there are still not mainstream and many ignorant Indians refer to them as Chinkies. Also, while that land is now strategically important, it is not and has never been very economically productive . Both the Indian and Chinese governments provide massive subsidies in the disputed regions and their vicinity. The situation is very different in Kashmir, which was ruled by the Dogras and Sikhs and was a Hindu region before the Islamic consequent.
The Hindu nationalists have always seen Islam as the existentialist theat. The Chinese have no place in their history or mythology.
It is true that China is substantially stronger than India militarily and economically, but it is also true that most of the Han Chinese economic, cultural and political centres are in the east. Their historical sphere of influence and current military focus is in the east towards Taiwan, the Koreas , Japan and South East Asia . India is mostly just an irritant on the other side of the Himalayas for them. Likewise, given the the relative military capacity of China and Pakistan, India is disproportionately focussed on Pakistan. There are bitter memories from 1962, anger at Chinese support for Pakistan and resentment and jealousy at how much China outpaced India since Deng opened up the economy, but there is no fundamental civilisational quarrel. Many Indians are obsessed with Pakistan. Very few have interest in China. Hundreds of Pakistanis are household names in India. Many Indians would not be able to name a single Chinese. If this were Chinese Defence Forum, you would have found hardly any Indians here .


