Turkish Foreign Policy and Regional Geopolitics

I agree with you that it was if anything,a bad move by the PM. However,it also was a chance defensively. But I agree that it is ironic,that Greece which stood with Arabs for decades,had the PM take pics with Netanyahu at the time period most of the EU was critical of Israel or at least reluctant to openly approach them and be friendly.


My personal opinion is we should have gone full French from the beginning. In the 2019-2021 period it was the French who supported us against Erdogan's provocations and threats. I don't know if you followed events,but in 2020 we reached a point were war or a hot incident were very possible.

So back then,it was the French who supported us warmly from the entire EU and NATO. Germans,Italians,Spanish,Dutch,British,Belgians,Austrians,Poles,Scandinavians all either did nothing,said little or outright cooperated with Erdogan.

On the contrary,the French supported us,our interests aligned and we got the Rafale in no time,we signed for the FDI frigates and we also signed a mutual defence agreement.
The French were eager to cooperate with us and the logical thing,apart from sentimental,would have been to continue this cooperation and friendship deeper.

And right when we were talking about Gowind corvettes...everything stops. In 2022-2023 the government ditches the French and goes American. Then the Biden administration and the notorious Blinken list (equipment to be given to Greece)turn out to be a disappointment. By that time,Mitsotakis has appointed Dendias as the new MoD (in summer 2023)and everything goes from bad to worse.

So,our air defence needs replacement. We have Soviet/Russian systems that need to be replaced because they are obsolete and we can't get any upgrades now nor any spare parts and the missiles will expire soon. In general we have to replace the

  • OSA AK/AKM
  • Tor-M1
  • S-300PMU1
  • I-HAWK PIP III
  • Skyguard VELOS (same as the Pakistani Skyguard Aspide,but with Sea Sparrow missiles)
We should have gone for MICA VL,SAMP/T which utilize missiles familiar to us,since the Air Force uses MICA on the Mirage and the Navy will be using Aster-30 on the FDI HN.
On top of that,we could have also gone for Mistral-3 manpads and Rapid Fire. In any case,we could have cooperated more with the French. And more closely. Since Germany has gone back to actively supporting Turkey and promoting them,as well as Britain and NATO'S current chief Rutte. We and the French could have become a counterbalance to that.

But there come the Israelis in a moment where they actually have problems with Turkey(apart from everyone else they've bombed). Turkey's been expanding here and there. Talking about Blue Homeland and heavy investments and influence in Syria. Selling weapons to Jolani's government. Taking out the Kurds who have been a thorn in the side of Turkey for decades. Establishing a base in Libya,getting access to the horn of Africa. Trying to get nuclear power with the help of Russia.

And during all the threats,actual threats,publically,on camera,in interviews,in speeches,
by Erdogan and his ministers and his army leaders and his parliamentary ally Bahçeli,
the Jews come and offer us quality weapons that we needed yesterday. Not today,we needed them yesterday and didn't have them. So the Armed Forces are talking about Spyder AiO,Barak MX,David's Sling,LORA and maybe more. The Israelis sweeten the deals with ToT. I don't know what kind of ToT but whatever it is...good.

Yes,it's awkward,yes it's bad. Netanyahu's government has been eliminating Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank. But since our government won't buy any French or Norwegian/Swedish AA systems,we might as well go with Israeli ones.

There's no defence pact,there's no treaty with Israel. Just a rapproachment because both Greeks(mainland and Cypriot)and Israelis see Turks as a threat. And Turks are a threat because every time there's talk of a project that will help Greece or Cyprus or Egypt(put the Jews aside)to prosper,to make money,to give them a chance to get out of any loans,there comes Erdogan and his goons and say "You can't do anything without Turkey's approval. We're a big country,we can't be ignored. You either include us or we'll take action".


But we haven't aligned or allied with India. Don't listen to Indian propaganda or that Turkish admiral. We don't have any kind of close relations.

In conclusion,tell me: If your country's interests and in the case of Cyprus,their physical existence apart from their interests,were threatened and you had no help from any other ally(for us neither the EU nor NATO stood up to contain Turkish expansion,on the contrary they encourage it),would you care more about Gaza and a people who the last 10 or so years have been pro-Turkish and against you or your survival?

Pakistan chose controversial PRC as an ally in the region back in the 70s. Maoist regime. Remember,they slaughtered millions,way more than what the Israelis have. They persecuted Islam,yet there you are. The Young Turks government chose the Bolsheviks as an ally when nobody would help them,after WWI. The Bolsheviks who also killed millions and persecuted Islam. And yet they supported Ataturk and Ataturk didn't say "it's not morally right".

Sorry,I elaborated way too much 😂
You’re bringing up claims about China’s treatment of its Muslim population. That narrative largely comes from Western and allied media, many of whom themselves are actively supporting or justifying what is happening in Palestine today. Not a single Muslim country has formally declared this an established genocide. I reject that comparison and the way it is selectively used.
That said, you are absolutely right about one thing: it is your country, and you have every right to buy whatever weapons you believe are necessary for your security. That is not my objection.
My point is about morality.
When a country knowingly stands with a state that is committing genocide, it sends a message to the world about its moral position. Security decisions do not exist in a vacuum — they reflect values as well as interests.
Countries and people stand with you in difficult times when you stand on moral principles, not only when interests align. You chose to prioritise security over morality. That is your right but it also defines the moral stance you project.
That is the core of my argument, and I believe that is where this discussion should end.
My Orthodox brother a foot soldier,🤪🤪
 
You’re bringing up claims about China’s treatment of its Muslim population. That narrative largely comes from Western and allied media, many of whom themselves are actively supporting or justifying what is happening in Palestine today. Not a single Muslim country has formally declared this an established genocide. I reject that comparison and the way it is selectively used.
But man,didn't Mao's China eliminate literally millions of people directly and indirectly? Yes,you could argue "it's their people",but that still doesn't make it better :P Same with the Bolsheviks who aided the Young Turks and Turkey up until the '30s or '40s.

That said, you are absolutely right about one thing: it is your country, and you have every right to buy whatever weapons you believe are necessary for your security. That is not my objection.
My point is about morality.
When a country knowingly stands with a state that is committing genocide, it sends a message to the world about its moral position. Security decisions do not exist in a vacuum — they reflect values as well as interests.
Look,I mean yes I agree with you. Every time the Western world was pro-Israeli we were like "Oh yeah? Well f you! We're with the Palestinians!" Now that they're skeptical about Israel we got closer to the Jews.

That's why I said our first choice should have been France. It makes sense to have France as our closest ally.We started we them in 2020-2021,they delivered Rafale to us in no time,we bought 4 FDI HN,they even gave us their production slots,back in 2008-2009 they offered us FREMM and in subsequent years offered us flexible ways to acquire them.We've been allies in most wars since 1821(except the Crimean War of course),we've had great relations politically since the 60s and 70s. It should have been France.

Countries and people stand with you in difficult times when you stand on moral principles, not only when interests align. You chose to prioritise security over morality. That is your right but it also defines the moral stance you project.
That is the core of my argument, and I believe that is where this discussion should end.
My Orthodox brother a foot soldier,🤪🤪
But then again,there's this thing: If you had to choose losing Pakistan or let's say the entire Kashmir,but morally stand up for Palestine,what would you choose?

There's also something some politicians and also greeks online bring as an argument. The Palestinians have been pro-Turkish the last ...I don't know maybe 10 years or so? Hamas was always Muslim Brotherhood and that means they are pro-Turkish. On the other hand Abbas

Screenshot 2025-08-07 at 16-35-18 Palestine's Abbas welcomes Turkey's reversion of Hagia Sophi...png

So here comes the argument by some people: Turkey has been arming like crazy and openly threatens us,already has us geopolitically surrounded,why do you care about pro-Turkish Palestinians(some of them call them islamists). When their own people won't bother! Their own Arab brethren!

So there's the irony,in Greek conversations I'm scolded and made fun of for being pro-Pal, they even call me leftist sometimes and here they call me zio-lover,jewish bootlicker,crypto-jew,israeli apologist etc etc


israeli-and-turkish-flags-during-the-israeli-presidents-visit-in-turkey.jpg
 
Last edited:
Do you know why he's bringing Pakistan in it? He knows when Pakistani jump into that. Egypt will not be able to speak there.
Problem here. I see that Greek is standing with the genocidal forces. That hurts me. I admire Greek as country. But this time they took a side with the wrong party. This man is a very clever. If Greek face this kind of talent from Turks that is very problematic for Greek

You guys stand with a regime that killed 10 plus thousand of its own citizens, which you guys downplayed and mocked here. Meanwhile Khamenei himself admitted that thousands were killed.

Stop the bs, you people don’t care about genocide of civilians or whatever. You only care if it fits your political view. So please, stop this farce. It’s not genuine. The recent massacre of Iranian civilians and the way Pakistanis react to it is nothing less than disgusting.
 
You guys stand with a regime that killed 10 plus thousand of its own citizens, which you guys downplayed and mocked here. Meanwhile Khamenei himself admitted that thousands were killed.

Stop the bs, you people don’t care about genocide of civilians or whatever. You only care if it fits your political view. So please, stop this farce. It’s not genuine. The recent massacre of Iranian civilians and the way Pakistanis react to it is nothing less than disgusting.
Who we stand with? Brother, do you need some mental help? I know very good Doctors
 
The overwhelming position on this forum was "it’s all zionist propaganda". Now that Iran itself has admitted the high death toll (real death toll is probably much higher than what they would admit) it has turned into "they were terrorists" or even that "civilians were killed by terrorists" (this seems to be what Iranian government now claims), which is an insult to human intelligence.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Last edited:
Iron used ther millitias abroad to kill ther own people lol...

stil people are defending them:ROFLMAO:....

Imagine what they would to the poeple who defend them...
 
Iron used ther millitias abroad to kill ther own people lol...

stil people are defending them:ROFLMAO:....

Imagine what they would to the poeple who defend them...
Get well soon. I can feel that you are graduated from Tel Aviv
 
This one is another masterpiece from this admiral
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Get well soon. I can feel that you are graduated from Tel Aviv

See, that’s what I was talking about. Be consistent. You can’t talk about genocide in Gaza in every context and then turn around and downplay or deny a government massacring its own citizens because of your ideological stance. What I understand from this is that your (I don’t mean you personally) outcry on Gaza has nothing to do with suffering of Gazans, that’s not really something you care about. You don’t even need to state a position on Iran, you can remain silent, but when you side with Iranian government on this issue, then it’s nothing short of hypocrisy.
 
Last edited:
Come on, man, let’s be honest about the reality here.

Iran hasn’t just been “criticised” or “pressured.” Its president died in a helicopter crash under highly suspicious circumstances, its top generals have been assassinated, and its nuclear scientists have been systematically killed over the years. These are not theories; these are documented events. This is what a covert war looks like.

On top of that, Iran has lived under crippling sanctions for nearly 50 years. It has been blocked from selling its oil freely, restricted from importing medicine and essential goods, and constantly targeted through intelligence operations, cyberattacks, sabotage, and proxy violence. Any country facing this level of sustained aggression would be on permanent security alert.

Iran is not fighting imaginary enemies. It is resisting foreign intelligence agencies, foreign-backed militias, and direct attacks by the US and Israel. We have already seen what happened to countries that didn’t resist Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan. And we both know who backed the groups that tore Iraq apart recently.

So no, you can’t talk about Iran as if it’s a normal state operating in peacetime conditions. Context matters. National security decisions don’t happen in a vacuum when your leadership, scientists, and military commanders are being killed one by one.

That doesn’t mean anyone has to blindly defend every internal policy of Iran. But pretending Iran is simply an aggressor while ignoring assassinations, sanctions, sabotage, and foreign interference is not moral clarity. It’s selective framing.

If you want to criticise Iran, do it honestly. Acknowledge the covert war, the assassinations, the siege, and the foreign interference. Otherwise, don’t lecture others about hypocrisy while erasing half the reality.
 
Those who killed Iranian presidents, scientists, and generals. They are so strong. They can kill anyone anywhere around the world. No country is safe from them, not even Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, or the Arabs. They are so strong. Recently, they killed those Libyan generals as well.
 
This is another masterpiece. This guy is something. Guys listen him and understand what descendant from Ottoman empires think... Definitely they have hundreds of year knowledge which was left by ottoman war machine
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
This is another masterpiece. This guy is something. Guys listen him and understand what descendant from Ottoman empires think... Definitely they have hundreds of year knowledge which was left by ottoman war machine
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

17ebf99e3b2f870d1a62bde6a6533dd1.jpg
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top