US Perspective on the Iran - Israel / US War

[KingQamaR]

Iranian missiles being intercepted over Jordan

But USA said all missiles were intercepted.
Guess that is mystical smoke we are seeing from base

 

[Shags101]

OK, let's decipher this.

Strait of Hormuz — shipping routes

1. Iranian side: Iranian territorial waters
2. Omani side: Omani territorial waters
3. Central shipping route: The route runs through areas on both the Iranian and Omani sides.

Iranian claim regarding mines

1. Iranian side — mined: Yes
2. Omani side — mined: No
3. Central route — Iranian side: Mined / claimed to have been mined
4. Central route — Omani side: No

US claim regarding mines cleared

1. Iranian side — mined: Yes / not cleared
2. Omani side — cleared
3. Central route — Iranian side: cleared
4. Central route — Omani side: cleared

My interpretation:
I am of the opinion that Iran may have mined its own side of the Strait, as well as the portion of the central shipping route on the Iranian side.

If that interpretation is correct:

1. The Iranian side remains mined.
2. The Iranian portion of the central shipping route has been cleared.
3. The Omani side was never mined.
4. The Omani portion of the central shipping route was never mined.

This could explain the apparent contradiction between the Iranian and US statements.

Iran may be referring specifically to the mines on the Iranian side, while the US is referring to the Omani side and the central shipping route that it says has been cleared.

Wow we actually have come to an agreement yes and that is why ships are crossing because USN knows those routes are either not heavily mined or not mined at all

 

[Pakistani Dragon]

The longest gas line Ive ever seen

How come I don't have to queue at petrol stations here in the UK, yet people are queuing for petrol in an energy-exporting country like Iran?

And don't people have jobs to go to anymore in Iran? They're apparently happy to spend hours sitting in queues stretching for miles just to get petrol.

Wait—no jobs and no fuel either?

 

[Pakistani Dragon]

For Iranians its the existential war, so they will fight to the last man, for America it can end this whenever they want, regardless of what is posted here, America is losing its standing and soft/hard power in the region. Many of its allies are suspcious of its behavior and if fear/economic snactions wasn't a factor a lot of "Allies" would've just walked away or asked American troops to simply leave.

America just wants to leave, but the Gulf monarchies are clinging onto its legs.

They think that as soon as America leaves, there'll be a lot of noise about the rebirth of the Persian Empire.

So the US says, “Okay, okay, I'll destroy Iran for you on my way out. That way, you won't have to worry about the dead Persian Empire for the next few decades.”

 

[AZ_HighCountry]

How come I don't have to queue at petrol stations here in the UK, yet people are queuing for petrol in an energy-exporting country like Iran?

And don't people have jobs to go to anymore in Iran? They're apparently happy to spend hours sitting in queues stretching for miles just to get petrol.

Wait—no jobs and no fuel either?

I could be wrong but Iran may not have sufficient refining capacity to meet its gasoline needs. Capacity expansion while under sanctions is hurting as well as key components required for gasoline may be banned.

 

[Starlord]

America just wants to leave, but the Gulf monarchies are clinging onto its legs.

They think that as soon as America leaves, there'll be a lot of noise about the rebirth of the Persian Empire.

So the US says, “Okay, okay, I'll destroy Iran for you on my way out. That way, you won't have to worry about the dead Persian Empire for the next few decades.”

America is not going anywhere, for as long as Israel exists Americans will keep coming to ME to die in Israel's wars like a good Goyim.

 

[Davey Crockett]

 

[Shags101]

Army Secretary Daniel P. Driscoll, the service’s top civilian leader, who clashed repeatedly with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth over the ouster of key combat-tested Army leaders, handed in his resignation to President Trump on Monday, administration officials said.

Mr. Driscoll’s resignation was expected but it comes at a tumultuous time, as the military’s largest service faces its busiest period since the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. Army air defense soldiers are playing the leading role in defending U.S. troops in the Middle East from increasingly sophisticated Iranian missile attacks. The Army’s command in Europe is providing critical intelligence and other support to Ukraine as it fights to hold off a larger Russian force.

And Mr. Hegseth has in the meantime initiated a series of firings and feuds that has left the Army essentially rudderless as it struggles to deal with the threat posed by cheap, deadly drones and missiles that have pounded U.S. bases in the Middle East.

Mr. Driscoll met with Mr. Trump in person to hand in his resignation and discuss the current state of the Army, said one official, who like others in this story spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss personnel issues.

The Army has not had a chief of staff, the service’s top officer, since Mr. Hegseth fired Gen. Randy George without explanation in April, and there are no signs that he is close to filling the position, officials said. Mr. Hegseth has forced out at least three senior officers who had been viewed as potential successors to General George.

Now the Army will also be without a civilian leader, at least until Mr. Trump appoints a new Army secretary. The resignation of Mr. Driscoll, first reported by The Wall Street Journal, comes as the midterms are approaching, and it may be difficult to get someone new confirmed soon.

Mr. Hegseth has indicated that he would like to see Sean Parnell, the Pentagon’s chief spokesman, in the job.

Mr. Parnell served as an officer in Afghanistan, but his tenure as the Pentagon’s chief spokesman has been buffeted by controversy. Mr. Parnell recently fired three journalists at Stars and Stripes, a federally funded but independent news organization. The journalists sued the government last week, claiming that the Pentagon had fired them in retaliation for writing about the worsening conditions on a Navy aircraft carrier deployed to the Middle East.

Mr. Parnell also led an effort to restrict reporters’ access within the Pentagon. The moves prompted The New York Times to sue the Pentagon on the grounds that the policy violated the First Amendment.

Mr. Parnell withdrew from a Senate race in November 2021 after a judge ruled that his estranged wife should have primary custody of their three children in a case in which she accused him of spousal and child abuse. The order was later vacated and Mr. Parnell has shared custody with his wife for several years, a Pentagon official said.

Mr. Parnell, who spoke at the 2024 rally in Butler, Pa., where Mr. Trump was nearly assassinated, has a strong relationship with the president, officials said. But senior administration officials said Mr. Parnell likely would struggle to be confirmed by the closely divided Senate.

Mr. Driscoll, a 40-year-old Army former first lieutenant, was until recently seen as a potential candidate to replace Mr. Hegseth if he decided to step down or fell out of favor with Mr. Trump. He garnered more support on Capitol Hill than did Mr. Hegseth, who has a combative relationship with the Democrats and even some Republicans on the key House and Senate committees that oversee the Pentagon.

Mr. Driscoll, in contrast, was viewed by many in Congress as one of the few Trump administration Pentagon officials who can work with lawmakers in both parties, two congressional aides said. While Mr. Hegseth has tried to limit direct communications between military officials and lawmakers, Mr. Driscoll has responded to requests from Republicans and Democrats alike in the Armed Services Committees, the aides said.

During his nomination hearings, Senator Elizabeth Warren, Democrat of Massachusetts, pressed him to commit to allowing the Army to repair its own equipment, instead of sending it back to defense contractors. Months later, Mr. Driscoll did so, putting the policy, known as “right to repair,” in place and earning a rare plaudit for a Trump administration official from a Democratic lawmaker (and one who had voted against his nomination).

But Mr. Driscoll told Mr. Trump that he was frustrated with Mr. Hegseth’s ouster of so many proven Army leaders and his blocking the promotions of a number of colonels who had worked for people he did not like, two officials said.

Man kind of embarrassing the state of Americas military under peteys “leadership” Rumsfeld Junior

 

[Davey Crockett]

Waiting for someone to do a FOIA request....

Army Secretary Dan Driscoll submitted his resignation letter to President Donald Trump on August 31, 2026, but the full text or an official PDF of the letter has not been publicly released by the White House.

 

[clutch]

 

[clutch]

 

[Davey Crockett]

There are some political dynamics as well, with WSJ also noting that "Driscoll is a former law school classmate of Vice President JD Vance. A former Army officer, he forged a close relationship with George, the former Army chief of staff who was fired by Hegseth in April. The two pushed soldiers to adopt new technology and become more adaptable battlefield threats."

So all this further seems bound up with personalities, loyalties, as well as contrasting visions for the future of America's armed forces. It should be noted that Driscoll as a Vance-ally was probably - just like the Vice President - deeply skeptical of many of the Trump's administration's Iran-related decisions.

Army Secretary Dan Driscoll Submits Resignation Amid Tensions With Hegseth<!-- --> | ZeroHedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

www.zerohedge.com

 

[Anatolia]

There are only 64 more days until Donald Trump can stop worrying about elections and do whatever he wants with Iran.

Until then, we'll just have to endure 64 days of nonsensical comments from him, apparently as a tactic to buy time.

I’m 100% with you on that. This whole “pause” or “truce” isn’t some neutral cooling‑off period ..it overwhelmingly works in favour of the US. A structured window like this gives US time to plan, reposition, gather intel, tighten alliances, and prepare whatever comes next. And with the election cycle winding down, you can already feel the pressure building. Trump is the type who needs to walk away from this looking dominant. His political persona doesn’t allow “stalemate” or “mutual compromise.” He has to come out of the 64‑day window with something he can frame as a win.

And realistically, Iran isn’t going to come out of this lightly. Their strategic position is weak, their alliances are thin, and the global mood is not sympathetic after the Strait of Hormuz threats. The US gets time, space, and leverage .. Iran gets what a countdown.

 

[Shags101]

W

I’m 100% with you on that. This whole “pause” or “truce” isn’t some neutral cooling‑off period ..it overwhelmingly works in favour of the US. A structured window like this gives US time to plan, reposition, gather intel, tighten alliances, and prepare whatever comes next. And with the election cycle winding down, you can already feel the pressure building. Trump is the type who needs to walk away from this looking dominant. His political persona doesn’t allow “stalemate” or “mutual compromise.” He has to come out of the 64‑day window with something he can frame as a win.

And realistically, Iran isn’t going to come out of this lightly. Their strategic position is weak, their alliances are thin, and the global mood is not sympathetic after the Strait of Hormuz threats. The US gets time, space, and leverage .. Iran gets what a countdown.

It’s a two way street as we have seen Iran has been hitting plenty of targets with pinpoint accuracy and Iran can produce these their missiles far quicker than America can replace their interceptors so far 7 year back log just to replace their allies and every time they have a skirmish that backlog gets longer

 

[AZ_HighCountry]

It’s a two way street as we have seen Iran has been hitting plenty of targets with pinpoint accuracy and Iran can produce these their missiles far quicker than America can replace their interceptors so far 7 year back log just to replace their allies and every time they have a skirmish that backlog gets longer

The backlog is being addressed via expansion of manufacturing capacity. But, that too takes time.