Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Disagree with the shooting. Hard to have much sympathy for.....
She's not innocent stop falling for zionist media propaganda.Shameful to demonize an innocent person like this.
So, finally, asked my wife on a hot takes in this, and this is what she said (She is NOT an American, and is not pro either side of the spectrum, she is a PI (Personal Injury) lawyer
Her responses are based on 2 videos she saw on YouTube, both from Sky News
Video 1
Video 2
The context is Video 1, which shows a snippet of what happened before and during the shooting, and Video 2 shows a snippet of what happened after the shooting. We will look at the 2 videos according to facts (Irrefutable truth) and context (Interpretation)
Facts of the case
1.) There was an SUV that drove past the Honda before the ICE agent intervene
2.) The Agent is in front of the vehicle (Video 1)
3.) The Agent is at the Driver's Side of the Vehicle (Video 1)
4.) The car turns right after the driver is shot (Video 1/2)
5.) The windscreen is clear, not obstructed (Video 2)
With those facts, we can establish 3 things.
The agent on the left side of the vehicle shot and killed the driver
There is no one further right to the agent that fire at the vehicle
The agent shot at the vehicle after the car was in forward motion.
First of all, if we look at the department's use of force policy, All Law Enforcement have the duty to retreat, because the use of deadly force should be the last resort. If there is any way you can avoid the use of force, the law enforcement agent should take that avenue before employing deadly force
Now for the agent himself, he is not blocked, nor was he in any way caught by surprise, as that was the vehicle's second move; she backed up first, and the car is not traveling excessively fast, so reasonably, he can avoid the car by stepping to the side, on the other hand, there are no one further to the right (To the driver, left to him) so there are no one to protect as there are no one in the oncoming direction of the car.
Secondly, he should have been able to see the action of the driver, as the windscreen is not obstructed, nor tinted, which means it is reasonable to believe he knows or saw that Good had turned her steering wheel and anticipated a right turn, as we see the car is on full right lock before the car is driving forward.
Finally, from the first video, there was another car that drove around Good's SUV before the ICE agent stopped, which begs the question, with the totality of circumstance, why wouldn't the ICE agents just drive around her instead of getting out of the vehicle and confronting the woman?
With the timing, we can deduce that the officer is likely to be acting negligently because,
1.) He did not follow the Standard Operating Procedure for Use of Force; there are reasonable avenues to retreat, but he didn't
2.) Either he did not register what was going on (Which is a negligence by itself for not aware of the situation), or he wasn't looking at where he was shooting (which would also be a negligence act
3.) There is no need for the ICE officer to intervene in the first place,
And if there is a civil rights violation lawsuit filed, the US government is very likely to lose that suit.
And I have asked her another question on the criminal culpability, to which she answered, "Do you consider firing at a target without looking at it as reckless?"
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.